Amending the Traditional ‘ACI Commentary Jc Method’ and Other Sources

Hugo Esquivel, Guang Lin
{"title":"Amending the Traditional ‘ACI Commentary Jc Method’ and Other Sources","authors":"Hugo Esquivel, Guang Lin","doi":"10.28991/cej-2023-09-11-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to amend the traditional formulas for polar moment of inertia suggested in Section R8.4.4.2.3 of ACI 318-19 and other sources. The authors claim that these formulas have been incorrectly derived as far back as 1960s due to an incorrect implementation of Steiner’s theorem (parallel axis theorem) for sections spanning in three-dimensional space. To support the claim, a formal proof using elementary calculus is presented in order to obtain the correct formulas with mathematical rigor. Then, the implications of using the traditional formulas versus the correct ones are investigated with the solution of a design problem related to a combined footing. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-11-015 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":10233,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2023-09-11-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to amend the traditional formulas for polar moment of inertia suggested in Section R8.4.4.2.3 of ACI 318-19 and other sources. The authors claim that these formulas have been incorrectly derived as far back as 1960s due to an incorrect implementation of Steiner’s theorem (parallel axis theorem) for sections spanning in three-dimensional space. To support the claim, a formal proof using elementary calculus is presented in order to obtain the correct formulas with mathematical rigor. Then, the implications of using the traditional formulas versus the correct ones are investigated with the solution of a design problem related to a combined footing. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-11-015 Full Text: PDF
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修正传统的 "ACI 评注 Jc 方法 "及其他来源
本文旨在修正 ACI 318-19 第 R8.4.4.2.3 节和其他资料中提出的极惯性矩传统公式。作者声称,这些公式早在 20 世纪 60 年代就已错误地推导出来,原因是针对三维空间跨度的截面,斯坦纳定理(平行轴定理)的实施方法不正确。为了支持这一说法,作者使用初等微积分进行了正式证明,从而以严谨的数学方法获得了正确的公式。然后,通过解决一个与组合式基脚相关的设计问题,研究了使用传统公式与正确公式的差异。Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-11-015 全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eco-friendly 3D Printing Mortar with Low Cement Content: Investigation on Printability and Mechanical Properties Response Reduction Factor for Structures with Significant Irregularities on Different Soil Stratum Assessment of Ground Penetrating Radar for Pyrite Swelling Detection in Soils Strength and Deformability of Structural Steel for Use in Construction Effect of Non-Class Fly Ash on Strength Properties of Concrete
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1