Eco-friendly 3D Printing Mortar with Low Cement Content: Investigation on Printability and Mechanical Properties

P. Sukontasukkul, Sila Komkham, Sittisak Jamnam, Hexin Zhang, Kazunori Fujikake, A. Puttiwongrak, C. Hansapinyo
{"title":"Eco-friendly 3D Printing Mortar with Low Cement Content: Investigation on Printability and Mechanical Properties","authors":"P. Sukontasukkul, Sila Komkham, Sittisak Jamnam, Hexin Zhang, Kazunori Fujikake, A. Puttiwongrak, C. Hansapinyo","doi":"10.28991/cej-2024-010-03-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional approach to achieving optimal printability and buildability in 3D printing mortar relies heavily on cement, which is both costly and environmentally detrimental due to substantial carbon emissions from its production. This study aims to mitigate these issues by investigating the viability of slag as a partial substitute for cement, with the goal of developing an eco-friendly alternative. The newly formulated mortar, featuring a 30% reduction in cement content (from 830 to 581 kg/m3) and the inclusion of 0.10% micro-fibers, exhibits properties comparable to conventional 3D printing mortar. The research is structured into two parts: Part 1 focuses on determining the optimal fiber content, while Part 2 delves into the investigation of fiber-reinforced mortar with reduced cement content for 3D printing. Criteria were established to ensure mortar flow at 115%, initial printable time below 60 minutes, and 7-day compressive strength exceeding 28 MPa. Part 1 results indicate that a fiber content of 0.1% by volume meets the specified requirements. In Part 2, it was observed that increasing the slag replacement percentage extended the initial printable time and time gap. However, even at a 30% replacement rate, the initial printable time remained within the acceptable range, partially attributed to the presence of fibers in the mix. Additionally, higher slag content led to increased flow and reduced filament height in the mixes. Notably, all formulations surpassed the 7-day compressive strength threshold. These findings underscore the potential of slag as a sustainable alternative to cement in 3D printing fiber-reinforced mortar, offering promising prospects for environmentally friendly construction practices. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-03-010 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":10233,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2024-010-03-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional approach to achieving optimal printability and buildability in 3D printing mortar relies heavily on cement, which is both costly and environmentally detrimental due to substantial carbon emissions from its production. This study aims to mitigate these issues by investigating the viability of slag as a partial substitute for cement, with the goal of developing an eco-friendly alternative. The newly formulated mortar, featuring a 30% reduction in cement content (from 830 to 581 kg/m3) and the inclusion of 0.10% micro-fibers, exhibits properties comparable to conventional 3D printing mortar. The research is structured into two parts: Part 1 focuses on determining the optimal fiber content, while Part 2 delves into the investigation of fiber-reinforced mortar with reduced cement content for 3D printing. Criteria were established to ensure mortar flow at 115%, initial printable time below 60 minutes, and 7-day compressive strength exceeding 28 MPa. Part 1 results indicate that a fiber content of 0.1% by volume meets the specified requirements. In Part 2, it was observed that increasing the slag replacement percentage extended the initial printable time and time gap. However, even at a 30% replacement rate, the initial printable time remained within the acceptable range, partially attributed to the presence of fibers in the mix. Additionally, higher slag content led to increased flow and reduced filament height in the mixes. Notably, all formulations surpassed the 7-day compressive strength threshold. These findings underscore the potential of slag as a sustainable alternative to cement in 3D printing fiber-reinforced mortar, offering promising prospects for environmentally friendly construction practices. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-03-010 Full Text: PDF
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低水泥含量的环保型 3D 打印砂浆:打印性能和机械特性研究
在三维打印砂浆中实现最佳可打印性和可构建性的传统方法主要依赖水泥,而水泥生产过程中会产生大量碳排放,不仅成本高昂,而且不利于环境。本研究旨在通过研究矿渣作为水泥部分替代品的可行性来缓解这些问题,从而开发出一种生态友好型替代品。新配制的砂浆水泥含量降低了 30%(从 830 kg/m3 降至 581 kg/m3),并加入了 0.10% 的微纤维,其性能与传统 3D 打印砂浆相当。研究分为两个部分:第 1 部分侧重于确定最佳纤维含量,而第 2 部分则深入研究了用于 3D 打印的、水泥含量较低的纤维增强砂浆。确定的标准是确保砂浆流动性达到 115%,初始打印时间低于 60 分钟,7 天抗压强度超过 28 兆帕。第 1 部分的结果表明,纤维含量为 0.1%(按体积计算)符合规定要求。在第 2 部分中,观察到矿渣替代率的增加延长了初始可印刷时间和时间间隙。不过,即使替代率为 30%,初始可印刷时间仍在可接受的范围内,部分原因是混合料中存在纤维。此外,炉渣含量越高,混合物中的流动性就越强,长丝高度就越低。值得注意的是,所有配方都超过了 7 天抗压强度阈值。这些发现强调了矿渣作为水泥的可持续替代品在 3D 打印纤维增强砂浆中的潜力,为环保型建筑实践提供了广阔的前景。Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-03-010 全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eco-friendly 3D Printing Mortar with Low Cement Content: Investigation on Printability and Mechanical Properties Response Reduction Factor for Structures with Significant Irregularities on Different Soil Stratum Assessment of Ground Penetrating Radar for Pyrite Swelling Detection in Soils Strength and Deformability of Structural Steel for Use in Construction Effect of Non-Class Fly Ash on Strength Properties of Concrete
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1