Fertility, Slavery, and Biblical Interpretation: John Chrysostom on the Story of Sarah and Hagar

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Biblical Theology Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1177/01461079231210847
C. L. de Wet
{"title":"Fertility, Slavery, and Biblical Interpretation: John Chrysostom on the Story of Sarah and Hagar","authors":"C. L. de Wet","doi":"10.1177/01461079231210847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fertility is a complex and contentious topic in biblical theology, touching upon social, cultural, and gender identity issues in the ancient world. It intersects with factors like gender, age, disability, and socio-economic status, notably in the context of slavery. Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar’s story, particularly Genesis 16, highlights the link between slavery and fertility. This study examines John Chrysostom’s interpretation of their narrative (ca. 349–407 CE) to explore these intersections. Chrysostom views fertility and infertility as social, moral, and theological concepts linked to divine intervention. He portrays Abraham as the ideal husband, Sarah as the ideal wife, and Hagar as a deviant slave woman. Theologically, he transforms slavery from a social status to an ontological state and criticizes Jewish identity. Chrysostom’s interpretation supports late antique slaveholding values, making infertility discourse a complex tool with intersectional dynamics in his biblical reception framework.","PeriodicalId":41921,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461079231210847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fertility is a complex and contentious topic in biblical theology, touching upon social, cultural, and gender identity issues in the ancient world. It intersects with factors like gender, age, disability, and socio-economic status, notably in the context of slavery. Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar’s story, particularly Genesis 16, highlights the link between slavery and fertility. This study examines John Chrysostom’s interpretation of their narrative (ca. 349–407 CE) to explore these intersections. Chrysostom views fertility and infertility as social, moral, and theological concepts linked to divine intervention. He portrays Abraham as the ideal husband, Sarah as the ideal wife, and Hagar as a deviant slave woman. Theologically, he transforms slavery from a social status to an ontological state and criticizes Jewish identity. Chrysostom’s interpretation supports late antique slaveholding values, making infertility discourse a complex tool with intersectional dynamics in his biblical reception framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生育、奴役与圣经解释:约翰-金口关于撒拉和夏甲的故事
生育在圣经神学中是一个复杂而有争议的话题,涉及古代世界的社会、文化和性别认同问题。它与性别、年龄、残疾和社会经济地位等因素交织在一起,尤其是在奴隶制的背景下。亚伯拉罕、撒拉和夏甲的故事,尤其是《创世纪》第 16 章,突出了奴隶制与生育之间的联系。本研究通过考察约翰-金口(John Chrysostom,约公元 349-407 年)对其故事的诠释来探讨这些交集。金口将生育和不育视为与神的干预相关的社会、道德和神学概念。他将亚伯拉罕描绘成理想的丈夫,将撒拉描绘成理想的妻子,将夏甲描绘成离经叛道的女奴。在神学上,他将奴隶制从一种社会地位转变为一种本体状态,并批判了犹太人的身份。金口的阐释支持了晚期古代奴隶制的价值观,使不孕症论述成为其圣经接受框架中具有交叉动态的复杂工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Biblical Theology Bulletin is a distinctive, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal containing articles and reviews written by experts in biblical and theological studies. The editors select articles that provide insights derived from critical biblical scholarship, culture-awareness, and thoughtful reflection on meanings of import for scholars of Bible and religion, religious educators, clergy, and those engaged with social studies in religion, inter-religious studies, and the praxis of biblical religion today. The journal began publication in 1971. It has been distinguished for its early and continuing publication of articles using the social sciences in addition to other critical methods for interpreting the Bible for contemporary readers, teachers, and preachers across cultural and denominational lines.
期刊最新文献
The Ideal Meal: Masculinity and Disability among Host and Guests in Luke Fertility, Slavery, and Biblical Interpretation: John Chrysostom on the Story of Sarah and Hagar Disability as a Symbol of Terror: Rereading the David Narrative in Light of Armed Conflicts in Africa Reading Ancient Temples through the Lens of Disability Studies and Mobility Design Presenting the Issue: Reading Biblical Texts in Conversation with Disability Studies and Health Humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1