{"title":"Curriculum Management in Higher Education: An Analysis Using the Four Frames Model","authors":"Jennifer Riad","doi":"10.7459/ct/38.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores curriculum management in higher education using Bolman and Deal’s Four Frames Model. The study focuses on a private Southern California university’s curriculum management process, examining it through the structural, human resources, political, and symbolic frames. The structural frame emphasizes role clarity and formal processes, while the human resources frame highlights relationships and individual well-being. The political frame addresses conflicts and power dynamics, emphasizing checks and balances. Finally, the symbolic frame emphasizes the meaning and purpose of curriculum changes, particularly in enhancing student learning. The analysis reveals a well-structured curriculum management process that fosters relationships, manages conflicts constructively, and remains connected to the overarching purpose of improving student learning. The findings suggest that a balanced approach that considers these frames can lead to effective curriculum management in higher education institutions.","PeriodicalId":35186,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum and Teaching","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/38.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research explores curriculum management in higher education using Bolman and Deal’s Four Frames Model. The study focuses on a private Southern California university’s curriculum management process, examining it through the structural, human resources, political, and symbolic frames. The structural frame emphasizes role clarity and formal processes, while the human resources frame highlights relationships and individual well-being. The political frame addresses conflicts and power dynamics, emphasizing checks and balances. Finally, the symbolic frame emphasizes the meaning and purpose of curriculum changes, particularly in enhancing student learning. The analysis reveals a well-structured curriculum management process that fosters relationships, manages conflicts constructively, and remains connected to the overarching purpose of improving student learning. The findings suggest that a balanced approach that considers these frames can lead to effective curriculum management in higher education institutions.
期刊介绍:
Curriculum and Teaching, first published in 1985, is an established, refereed international journal publishing original research from throughout the world which deals with major up-to-date issues and trends in curriculum theory and practice. The journal uses a balanced and comparative perspective to consider curriculum design and development, evaluation, curriculum models, comparative studies in curriculum, innovation and policy, planning, and educational administration. The journal’s object is to advance the study and development of curriculum and teaching, with a view to improving teaching and pedagogy. Curriculum and Teaching provides an impartial forum for scholars throughout the world, working in the area of curriculum studies. Curriculum and Teaching is double blind peer reviewed. The journal has no publication fees.