Advancing home-like environments for memory care residents within nursing homes

M. Strickfaden, Orsolya Welch
{"title":"Advancing home-like environments for memory care residents within nursing homes","authors":"M. Strickfaden, Orsolya Welch","doi":"10.1097/NR9.0000000000000044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: This article reports on 5 specialized memory care environments within nursing homes in Canada through the theory of affordances with the aim of understanding the layered implications of affordances on memory care residents by curating objects within and configuring or designing spatial environments. Methods: A spatial/object-centric approach was taken by using a detailed analysis framework based on a robust interpretation of the theory of affordances and well-known elements, principles, and physical/construction properties of interior and spatial design. A web content analysis method, using hundreds of photographs, drawings, and textual information belonging to 5 nursing homes posted on websites and on social media, was used. Results: The results include a detailed analysis framework informed by affordance theory and 3 themes that reveal details about the designed environments. The 3 themes are: (1) how contextual factors of affordances of place and care played out, (2) how physical, cultural, and semantic affordances aided or detracted from memory care, and (3) how home-like environments with public, semiprivate, and private spaces involved multiple affordances and constraints that provided multisensory clues towards supporting and/or limiting memory care residents’ possible actions. Conclusions: We conclude that although affordances can open a range of possible actions, they are not ideal for configuring or designing home-like environments, and it is necessary for memory care residents to be presented with constraints that limit alternatives and misaffordances. This article provides evidence about how affordances and constraints are (and could be) intentionally embedded in home-like memory care environments in nursing homes.","PeriodicalId":73407,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","volume":"11 1","pages":"235 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NR9.0000000000000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This article reports on 5 specialized memory care environments within nursing homes in Canada through the theory of affordances with the aim of understanding the layered implications of affordances on memory care residents by curating objects within and configuring or designing spatial environments. Methods: A spatial/object-centric approach was taken by using a detailed analysis framework based on a robust interpretation of the theory of affordances and well-known elements, principles, and physical/construction properties of interior and spatial design. A web content analysis method, using hundreds of photographs, drawings, and textual information belonging to 5 nursing homes posted on websites and on social media, was used. Results: The results include a detailed analysis framework informed by affordance theory and 3 themes that reveal details about the designed environments. The 3 themes are: (1) how contextual factors of affordances of place and care played out, (2) how physical, cultural, and semantic affordances aided or detracted from memory care, and (3) how home-like environments with public, semiprivate, and private spaces involved multiple affordances and constraints that provided multisensory clues towards supporting and/or limiting memory care residents’ possible actions. Conclusions: We conclude that although affordances can open a range of possible actions, they are not ideal for configuring or designing home-like environments, and it is necessary for memory care residents to be presented with constraints that limit alternatives and misaffordances. This article provides evidence about how affordances and constraints are (and could be) intentionally embedded in home-like memory care environments in nursing homes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为疗养院内的记忆性护理住院患者营造类似家庭的环境
摘要 目的:本文通过负担能力理论,对加拿大疗养院内的 5 个专门记忆护理环境进行了报道,旨在通过在空间环境中策划物品、配置或设计空间环境,了解负担能力对记忆护理住院者的多层次影响。方法:我们采用了以空间/物体为中心的方法,使用了一个详细的分析框架,该框架基于对可承受性理论以及室内和空间设计中众所周知的元素、原则和物理/建筑特性的有力解释。使用网络内容分析法,对 5 家养老院在网站和社交媒体上发布的数百张照片、图纸和文字信息进行分析。研究结果结果包括一个详细的分析框架,该框架参考了承受力理论和 3 个揭示设计环境细节的主题。这 3 个主题是(1)场所和护理的可承受性的环境因素是如何发挥作用的;(2)物理、文化和语义上的可承受性是如何帮助或减弱记忆护理的;(3)具有公共、半私人和私人空间的家庭式环境是如何涉及多种可承受性和限制的,这些可承受性和限制为支持和/或限制记忆护理住院者可能采取的行动提供了多感官线索。结论:我们得出的结论是,虽然负担能力可以开启一系列可能的行动,但它们并不是配置或设计家庭式环境的理想选择,有必要为记忆性护理住院者提供限制备选方案和错误负担能力的约束条件。这篇文章提供了证据,说明在养老院的家庭式记忆护理环境中,如何有意识地嵌入负担能力和约束条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interdisciplinary collaboration for chronic illness prevention and management through digital health interventions. Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and neurodevelopmental outcomes among black and white preterm infants up to two years of age. Nurse-led self-management support to improve symptom management and self-reported outcomes in people with irritable bowel syndrome. Research of assisted housing design for the bedridden elderly and their family caregivers Digital twin prevalence in the medical caring fields: a bibliomatrics study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1