A Study on the Impact of Deglobalization on the Economic Growth of Asia-Pacific Countries: Nonlinear Relationship Analysis using Spatial Panel Regression Model

So-Youn Kim, S. Ryu
{"title":"A Study on the Impact of Deglobalization on the Economic Growth of Asia-Pacific Countries: Nonlinear Relationship Analysis using Spatial Panel Regression Model","authors":"So-Youn Kim, S. Ryu","doi":"10.16980/jitc.19.5.202310.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - The WTO and World Bank have pointed out the phenomenon of deglobalization. Despite this, Asian countries are pursuing closer cooperation with other countries in the region and around the world. Accordingly, this study analyzes the impact of deglobalization on the economic growth of Asia-Pacific countries through non-linear relationships. We use 33 Asia-Pacific nation’s panel data from 1990, when globalization rapidly increased, to 2020, when deglobalization saw progress. Design/Methodology/Approach - We analyze the spatial panel regression model using the AMG (Augmented Mean-Group) estimation method, which controls for cross-sectional dependence between countries in panel data and country-specific slope coefficient heterogeneity in the panel model. Findings - As a result of the estimation, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between deglobalization and Asia-Pacific economic growth. As deglobalization occurs up to 50.11%, economic growth increases, but as deglobalization continues past 50.11%, economic growth decreases. Research Implications - Countries with less deglobalization must increase economic growth through policies that protect their own industries, and countries whose level of deglobalization exceeds the threshold must open international relations and pursue economic growth through mutual cooperation and economic integration. In the long term, deglobalization threatens Asia's integrated development and sustainable growth, so globalization, free trade, and multilateralism must be maintained.","PeriodicalId":166989,"journal":{"name":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.19.5.202310.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose - The WTO and World Bank have pointed out the phenomenon of deglobalization. Despite this, Asian countries are pursuing closer cooperation with other countries in the region and around the world. Accordingly, this study analyzes the impact of deglobalization on the economic growth of Asia-Pacific countries through non-linear relationships. We use 33 Asia-Pacific nation’s panel data from 1990, when globalization rapidly increased, to 2020, when deglobalization saw progress. Design/Methodology/Approach - We analyze the spatial panel regression model using the AMG (Augmented Mean-Group) estimation method, which controls for cross-sectional dependence between countries in panel data and country-specific slope coefficient heterogeneity in the panel model. Findings - As a result of the estimation, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between deglobalization and Asia-Pacific economic growth. As deglobalization occurs up to 50.11%, economic growth increases, but as deglobalization continues past 50.11%, economic growth decreases. Research Implications - Countries with less deglobalization must increase economic growth through policies that protect their own industries, and countries whose level of deglobalization exceeds the threshold must open international relations and pursue economic growth through mutual cooperation and economic integration. In the long term, deglobalization threatens Asia's integrated development and sustainable growth, so globalization, free trade, and multilateralism must be maintained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去全球化对亚太国家经济增长影响的研究:利用空间面板回归模型进行非线性关系分析
目的--世贸组织和世界银行已经指出了非全球化现象。尽管如此,亚洲国家仍在寻求与本地区乃至世界其他国家开展更紧密的合作。因此,本研究通过非线性关系分析了去全球化对亚太地区国家经济增长的影响。我们使用 33 个亚太国家的面板数据,时间跨度从全球化迅速发展的 1990 年到去全球化取得进展的 2020 年。 设计/方法/途径 - 我们使用 AMG(增强均值组)估计方法分析了空间面板回归模型,该方法控制了面板数据中国家间的横截面依赖性和面板模型中特定国家斜率系数的异质性。 研究结果 - 估计结果表明,去全球化与亚太地区经济增长之间存在倒 U 型关系。当全球化程度达到 50.11%时,经济增长上升,但当全球化程度超过 50.11%时,经济增长下降。 研究启示 - 去全球化程度较低的国家必须通过保护本国产业的政策来提高经济增长,而去全球化程度超过临界值的国家必须开放国际关系,通过相互合作和经济一体化来追求经济增长。从长远来看,非全球化威胁着亚洲的一体化发展和可持续增长,因此必须坚持全球化、自由贸易和多边主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Logistics Efficiency and FTAs on International Trade: The Experience of G-20 Countries A Study on the Intention of Product Loyalists to Act as Independent Entrepreneurs in China’s Network Marketing Industry: Focused on the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior A Comprehensive Analysis of Customers’ Impulsive Buying Behavior in Live Commerce The Effect of Consumer Lifestyle on the Acceptance Intention of Fully Autonomous Vehicles: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Safety The Impact of Introducing Experiential Factors on Willingness to Pay a Premium at Fairs: An Application of the Contingent Valuation Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1