DIFFERENCES OF STUDENTS’ CHEMISTRY LEARNING OUTCOMES BASED ON THE 5E LEARNING CYCLE MODEL

Defi Elfrida, Rini Selly
{"title":"DIFFERENCES OF STUDENTS’ CHEMISTRY LEARNING OUTCOMES BASED ON THE 5E LEARNING CYCLE MODEL","authors":"Defi Elfrida, Rini Selly","doi":"10.21107/jps.v10i2.19275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 5E learning cycle model is a learning model that gives opportunities for students to be able to maximize learning by guiding students to be involved in the learning process actively. One of the chemistry concepts that is difficult for students to understand is acid-base topic. This study aims to find out the differences in students' chemistry learning outcomes that apply the 5E learning cycle model by using handouts and PowerPoint-based learning media on acids and bases topic in the eleventh grade of a state senior high school of Medan. This research is included in a quasi-experimental research design with a pretest-posttest control group design. The sample in this study was eleventh grade with experimental class I taught using the 5E learning cycle model assisted by handout media and class experimental II taught using the 5E learning cycle model assisted by PowerPoint-based learning media. Sampling was completed using a random sampling technique. The instrument used in this study was an objective question in the form of multiple choice of 20 questions which had been tested for validity, difficulty level, discriminating, and reliability. The handout media used in this research has been validated by three expert validators and is suitable for use. The result of this research indicates that there are differences between the two classes with the average student learning outcome in experimental class I which was 85,33 compared with the average student learning outcome in experimental class II which is 80,67. Thus, it can be concluded that the 5E learning cycle model using handout media can be applied to the learning process, especially in acid-base topic.","PeriodicalId":31927,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pena Sains","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pena Sains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21107/jps.v10i2.19275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 5E learning cycle model is a learning model that gives opportunities for students to be able to maximize learning by guiding students to be involved in the learning process actively. One of the chemistry concepts that is difficult for students to understand is acid-base topic. This study aims to find out the differences in students' chemistry learning outcomes that apply the 5E learning cycle model by using handouts and PowerPoint-based learning media on acids and bases topic in the eleventh grade of a state senior high school of Medan. This research is included in a quasi-experimental research design with a pretest-posttest control group design. The sample in this study was eleventh grade with experimental class I taught using the 5E learning cycle model assisted by handout media and class experimental II taught using the 5E learning cycle model assisted by PowerPoint-based learning media. Sampling was completed using a random sampling technique. The instrument used in this study was an objective question in the form of multiple choice of 20 questions which had been tested for validity, difficulty level, discriminating, and reliability. The handout media used in this research has been validated by three expert validators and is suitable for use. The result of this research indicates that there are differences between the two classes with the average student learning outcome in experimental class I which was 85,33 compared with the average student learning outcome in experimental class II which is 80,67. Thus, it can be concluded that the 5E learning cycle model using handout media can be applied to the learning process, especially in acid-base topic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 5e 学习周期模式的学生化学学习成果的差异
5E 学习循环模式是一种通过引导学生主动参与学习过程,让学生有机会最大限度地学习的学习模式。酸鹼是學生難以理解的化學概念之一。本研究旨在通过在棉兰市一所州立高级中学十一年级的酸碱课题中使用讲义和基于 PowerPoint 的学习媒体,找出学生在应用 5E 学习循环模式下的化学学习成果的差异。本研究采用前测-后测对照组的准实验研究设计。本研究的样本是十一年级的实验班(I)和实验班(II),实验班(I)采用 5E 学习循环模式,由讲义媒体辅助教学,实验班(II)采用 5E 学习循环模式,由 PowerPoint 学习媒体辅助教学。抽样采用随机抽样技术。本研究使用的工具是客观题,形式为多选题,共有 20 道题,已对其有效性、难度、区分度和可靠性进行了测试。本研究中使用的讲义媒体已经过三位专家验证,适合使用。研究结果表明,两个班级之间存在差异,实验一班学生的平均学习成绩为 85.33,而实验二班学生的平均学习成绩为 80.67。因此,可以得出结论,使用讲义媒体的 5E 学习循环模式可以应用到学习过程中,尤其是酸碱课题的学习过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE ETHNOSCIENCE OF BREM IN WONOGIRI AND ITS INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE LEARNING: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY DETERMINATION OF VITAMIN C IN SPINACH (Amaranthus sp.) USING TITRATION METHOD IMPLEMENTATION OF STAD-BASED LEARNING MODEL IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES DIFFERENCES OF STUDENTS’ CHEMISTRY LEARNING OUTCOMES BASED ON THE 5E LEARNING CYCLE MODEL NEED ANALYSIS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MINI RESEARCH-BASED GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY LEARNING SETS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1