Sociodemographic decomposition of inequality in self-rated health: A cross-sectional study in Hubei, China

Xiaosheng Lei, Chaojie Liu
{"title":"Sociodemographic decomposition of inequality in self-rated health: A cross-sectional study in Hubei, China","authors":"Xiaosheng Lei, Chaojie Liu","doi":"10.56028/aehssr.8.1.177.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Health inequality is associated with profound social, health and economic costs. Despite extensive studies about inequality in health outcomes, our understanding of inequality in self-rated health is quite limited. This study aimed to determine the inequality in self-rated health and its associated factors in Hubei populations, China.  Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on the community residents purposively selected from six municipalities in Hubei province, China. Participants were asked to rate their health on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5. A total of 1336 valid questionnaires were collected. Inequality in self-rated health was assessed using concentration index and further decomposed to measure sociodemographic inequality in the health of residents.  Results: Two thirds (66%) of respondents rated their health as “excellent/very good/good”, while 34% rated it as fair or poor. The income-related concentration index was 0.0321 (95% CI, 0.0229 to 0.0413), indicating a concentration of poor self-rated health in the low-income groups. The CI of SRH in urban areas was 0.0239, which was lower than that in rural areas (0.0379). Age (17.5%) made the biggest contribution to the inequality in SRH, which was followed by employment (15.7%), income (8.5%), education (4.5%) and physical exercise (3.0%). Conclusions: There exist socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health in Hubei, China. Policy priorities should be given to rural area, the older people and those with low economic participation.","PeriodicalId":502379,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.8.1.177.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Health inequality is associated with profound social, health and economic costs. Despite extensive studies about inequality in health outcomes, our understanding of inequality in self-rated health is quite limited. This study aimed to determine the inequality in self-rated health and its associated factors in Hubei populations, China.  Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on the community residents purposively selected from six municipalities in Hubei province, China. Participants were asked to rate their health on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5. A total of 1336 valid questionnaires were collected. Inequality in self-rated health was assessed using concentration index and further decomposed to measure sociodemographic inequality in the health of residents.  Results: Two thirds (66%) of respondents rated their health as “excellent/very good/good”, while 34% rated it as fair or poor. The income-related concentration index was 0.0321 (95% CI, 0.0229 to 0.0413), indicating a concentration of poor self-rated health in the low-income groups. The CI of SRH in urban areas was 0.0239, which was lower than that in rural areas (0.0379). Age (17.5%) made the biggest contribution to the inequality in SRH, which was followed by employment (15.7%), income (8.5%), education (4.5%) and physical exercise (3.0%). Conclusions: There exist socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health in Hubei, China. Policy priorities should be given to rural area, the older people and those with low economic participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自评健康不平等的社会人口分解:中国湖北的横断面研究
目标:健康不平等会带来巨大的社会、健康和经济损失。尽管对健康结果的不平等进行了大量研究,但我们对自评健康不平等的了解却相当有限。本研究旨在确定中国湖北省人群自评健康的不平等及其相关因素。 研究方法我们从湖北省 6 个地级市的社区居民中进行了横断面问卷调查。受访者被要求用 1-5 分的李克特五点量表对自己的健康状况进行评分。共收集到 1336 份有效问卷。采用集中指数评估自评健康的不平等程度,并进一步分解以衡量居民健康的社会人口不平等程度。 结果显示三分之二(66%)的受访者将自己的健康状况评为 "优秀/很好/良好",34%的受访者将自己的健康状况评为 "一般或较差"。与收入相关的集中指数为 0.0321(95% CI,0.0229 至 0.0413),表明自评健康状况较差的人群集中在低收入群体中。城市地区 SRH 的集中指数为 0.0239,低于农村地区(0.0379)。年龄(17.5%)是造成性健康和生殖健康不平等的最大原因,其次是就业(15.7%)、收入(8.5%)、教育(4.5%)和体育锻炼(3.0%)。结论中国湖北省在自评健康方面存在社会经济不平等。政策重点应放在农村地区、老年人和经济参与度低的人群上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Argentine Warships in Russo-Japanese War The teleworking strategy for vocational counselors in the era of convergence media The Loving Space: Motherhood and the Natural Sublime in Contemporary Floral painting The change of Chinese elements in Hollywood films from a cross-cultural perspective Course Construction and Practice of Embedded Computing for New Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1