Social classes and political Islam: a comparative ecological approach of post-Arab Spring elections in Northern Africa (2011- 2014)

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1080/13530194.2022.2079116
Gilles Van hamme, Alia Gana
{"title":"Social classes and political Islam: a comparative ecological approach of post-Arab Spring elections in Northern Africa (2011- 2014)","authors":"Gilles Van hamme, Alia Gana","doi":"10.1080/13530194.2022.2079116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Starting from the debate on the sociology of political Islam, opposing interpretations centred on identity and on specific class alliances, the paper proposes a comparative analysis of the socio-geographies of mainstream Islamist parties in the post-Arab spring period in Morocco, Tunisia, and Egypt. The paper shows that socio-geographies of political Islam are very pronounced, making unlikely an interpretation of Islamist parties as having a purely non class-based identity. These results challenge the conception of political Islam as a hegemonic ideology among Arab populations, as such an ideology would be built on their cultural heritage, repressed both by colonialism and by post-colonial elites. This conception denies the complexity of modern Arab societies, the importance of minorities, the diversity of social trajectories and the capacity of other movements to penetrate into some deprived rural or urban areas. This analysis neither validates conclusions that political Islam is an alliance between the deprived urban classes and the traditional bourgeoisie politically excluded from the ruling post-colonial classes. Rather, one finding is that the social grounds of Islamists are very dependent on the national contexts.","PeriodicalId":46267,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies","volume":"305 3 1","pages":"1234 - 1254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2022.2079116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Starting from the debate on the sociology of political Islam, opposing interpretations centred on identity and on specific class alliances, the paper proposes a comparative analysis of the socio-geographies of mainstream Islamist parties in the post-Arab spring period in Morocco, Tunisia, and Egypt. The paper shows that socio-geographies of political Islam are very pronounced, making unlikely an interpretation of Islamist parties as having a purely non class-based identity. These results challenge the conception of political Islam as a hegemonic ideology among Arab populations, as such an ideology would be built on their cultural heritage, repressed both by colonialism and by post-colonial elites. This conception denies the complexity of modern Arab societies, the importance of minorities, the diversity of social trajectories and the capacity of other movements to penetrate into some deprived rural or urban areas. This analysis neither validates conclusions that political Islam is an alliance between the deprived urban classes and the traditional bourgeoisie politically excluded from the ruling post-colonial classes. Rather, one finding is that the social grounds of Islamists are very dependent on the national contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会阶层和政治伊斯兰:北非阿拉伯之春后选举(2011-2014 年)的比较生态学方法
ABSTRACT 本文从政治伊斯兰社会学的争论出发,反对以身份认同和特定阶级联盟为中心的解释,对阿拉伯之春后摩洛哥、突尼斯和埃及主流伊斯兰政党的社会地理进行了比较分析。论文表明,政治伊斯兰的社会地理特征非常明显,因此不可能将伊斯兰政党解释为具有纯粹的非阶级身份。这些研究结果对将政治伊斯兰教视为阿拉伯人口中的霸权意识形态的观点提出了质疑,因为这种意识形态将建立在他们的文化遗产之上,而这些文化遗产既受到殖民主义的压制,也受到后殖民精英的压制。这种观念否认了现代阿拉伯社会的复杂性、少数民族的重要性、社会轨迹的多样性以及其他运动渗透到一些贫困农村或城市地区的能力。这一分析既没有证实政治伊斯兰教是城市贫困阶层与在政治上被排除在后殖民统治阶层之外的传统资产阶级之间的联盟这一结论。相反,一个发现是,伊斯兰主义者的社会基础在很大程度上取决于国家背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies is a refereed academic journal published for the British Society for Middle Eastern Studies (popularly known as BRISMES). Founded in 1974 as the BRISMES Bulletin, the British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies assumed its present title in 1991 reflecting its growth into a fully-fledged scholarly journal. The editors aim to maintain a balance in the journal"s coverage between the modern social sciences and the more traditional disciplines associated with Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies. They welcome scholarly contributions on all aspects of the Middle East from the end of classical antiquity and the rise of Islam.
期刊最新文献
Al-Lajjun: a Social and geographic account of a Palestinian Village during the British Mandate Period Challenges in the conceptualization and implementation of normalization: insights from Egyptian–Israeli Relations The role of the Israeli-Syrian mixed armistice commission in the fate of the Arabs of Krad al-Baqqara and Krad al-Ghaname 1948-1956 Confronting minorization: colonial missionaries and Ottoman millets in the eyes of a Nineteenth Century Baghdadi Rabbi The compromise of Islamism and democracy in the light of the Tunisian revolution and views of Rachid al-Gannouchi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1