Psychometric Assessment of Infant Colic Scale in Iranian Population

Reihaneh Montazeri, Shirin Hasanpour, M. Mirghafourvand, Mohammad Asghari jafarabadi, Manizheh Mostafa Gharehbaghi, Soheila Bani
{"title":"Psychometric Assessment of Infant Colic Scale in Iranian Population","authors":"Reihaneh Montazeri, Shirin Hasanpour, M. Mirghafourvand, Mohammad Asghari jafarabadi, Manizheh Mostafa Gharehbaghi, Soheila Bani","doi":"10.34172/jcs.2023.31959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Infant colic, causing excessive crying, poses anxiety for parents and a challenge for pediatricians and nurses. The Infant Colic Scale (ICS) serves to assess the severity and causal factors of colic. Despite its significance, the psychometric properties of ICS have not been evaluated in the Iranian population. This study seeks to address this gap by assessing the psychometric properties of ICS in Iran. Methods: A sample of 220 mothers with 2–16-week-old term infants diagnosed with infantile colic was selected through convenience sampling. Following forward and back-translation, the face validity, content validity, and construct validity of ICS were systematically evaluated. Reliability was examined through both internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test-retest stability methods. Results: Content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) values for ICS were 0.94 and 0.81, respectively. The good fit indices confirmed the validity of the five-factor structure. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were 0.71 and 0.94, respectively. Conclusion: The Persian version of ICS is a valid and reliable tool, suitable for assessing infantile colic in the Iranian population. Future studies and clinical practice can utilize this tool to identify major causes of this disorder in the Iranian context.","PeriodicalId":15317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2023.31959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Infant colic, causing excessive crying, poses anxiety for parents and a challenge for pediatricians and nurses. The Infant Colic Scale (ICS) serves to assess the severity and causal factors of colic. Despite its significance, the psychometric properties of ICS have not been evaluated in the Iranian population. This study seeks to address this gap by assessing the psychometric properties of ICS in Iran. Methods: A sample of 220 mothers with 2–16-week-old term infants diagnosed with infantile colic was selected through convenience sampling. Following forward and back-translation, the face validity, content validity, and construct validity of ICS were systematically evaluated. Reliability was examined through both internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test-retest stability methods. Results: Content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) values for ICS were 0.94 and 0.81, respectively. The good fit indices confirmed the validity of the five-factor structure. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were 0.71 and 0.94, respectively. Conclusion: The Persian version of ICS is a valid and reliable tool, suitable for assessing infantile colic in the Iranian population. Future studies and clinical practice can utilize this tool to identify major causes of this disorder in the Iranian context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗婴儿腹绞痛量表的心理测量学评估
引言婴儿肠绞痛会导致过度哭闹,给家长带来焦虑,也给儿科医生和护士带来挑战。婴儿肠绞痛量表(ICS)用于评估肠绞痛的严重程度和致病因素。尽管 ICS 非常重要,但其心理测量特性尚未在伊朗人群中进行过评估。本研究旨在通过评估 ICS 在伊朗的心理测量特性来填补这一空白。研究方法通过便利性抽样,选取了 220 名 2-16 周大足月儿被诊断为婴儿肠绞痛的母亲作为样本。经过正译和反译后,对 ICS 的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度进行了系统评估。通过内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)和测试-再测试稳定性方法对信度进行了检验。结果如下内容效度指数(CVI)和内容效度比(CVR)分别为 0.94 和 0.81。良好的拟合指数证实了五因素结构的有效性。克朗巴赫α系数和类内相关系数(ICC)分别为 0.71 和 0.94。结论波斯语版的 ICS 是一种有效、可靠的工具,适用于评估伊朗人群中的婴儿肠绞痛。未来的研究和临床实践可利用该工具来确定伊朗婴幼儿肠绞痛的主要病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Seeking Psychological Help Associated to Self-Stigma and Perceived Social Stigma Effectiveness of Swallowing and Oral Care Interventions on Oral Intake and Salivary Flow of Patients Following Endotracheal Extubation at a Tertiary Care Center: A Randomized Controlled Trial Abnormal Burnout of Nurses in Crisis; Double Pressure of Low Support and Competence Psychometric Assessment of Infant Colic Scale in Iranian Population Novel Memories of Motherhood: Childbirth Lived Experiences of Mothers with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1