Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of M30 Grade Concrete Using Waste Glass Powder in Comparison with Conventional Concrete

Q4 Materials Science NanoWorld Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-051
Vengala Shriram, Ganesan Ramachandran
{"title":"Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of M30 Grade Concrete Using Waste Glass Powder in Comparison with Conventional Concrete","authors":"Vengala Shriram, Ganesan Ramachandran","doi":"10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to compare glass powder based M30 concrete to conventional concrete in terms of compressive strength. 18 samples were divided into two groups and prepped for data collection. The first is made using glass powder in place of fine aggregate, and the second is regular concrete. The preparation and examination of the samples involved using a variety of tools and materials. The pretest power is determined with 80% confidence intervals (CI) are 95% respectively. The 20% of glass powder was partially replaced in fine aggregate. Utilizing the universal testing machine, compression strength tests were conducted. The independent sample t-test was carried out using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software, version 21. The mean compressive strength of concrete with innovative glass powder was 35.4978 N/mm 2 , whereas the typical mean compressive strength of conventional concrete is 34.2744 N/mm 2 . A t-test for independent samples is used to analyze the findings. The significance was p = 0.000 (p < 0.05). This demonstrates that the two approaches have a statistically significant difference. The standard deviation is 1.6697, 2.1529, and the standard error is 0.3935, 0.5074, with the mean value being 34.2744 N/mm 2 , 35.4978N/ mm 2 . From this experimental study, the innovative glass powder based M30 grade concrete is found to have a higher compressive strength than regular concrete, it is determined.","PeriodicalId":36802,"journal":{"name":"NanoWorld Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NanoWorld Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare glass powder based M30 concrete to conventional concrete in terms of compressive strength. 18 samples were divided into two groups and prepped for data collection. The first is made using glass powder in place of fine aggregate, and the second is regular concrete. The preparation and examination of the samples involved using a variety of tools and materials. The pretest power is determined with 80% confidence intervals (CI) are 95% respectively. The 20% of glass powder was partially replaced in fine aggregate. Utilizing the universal testing machine, compression strength tests were conducted. The independent sample t-test was carried out using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software, version 21. The mean compressive strength of concrete with innovative glass powder was 35.4978 N/mm 2 , whereas the typical mean compressive strength of conventional concrete is 34.2744 N/mm 2 . A t-test for independent samples is used to analyze the findings. The significance was p = 0.000 (p < 0.05). This demonstrates that the two approaches have a statistically significant difference. The standard deviation is 1.6697, 2.1529, and the standard error is 0.3935, 0.5074, with the mean value being 34.2744 N/mm 2 , 35.4978N/ mm 2 . From this experimental study, the innovative glass powder based M30 grade concrete is found to have a higher compressive strength than regular concrete, it is determined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用废玻璃粉的 M30 级混凝土抗压强度与传统混凝土对比的实验研究
本研究的目的是比较玻璃粉 M30 混凝土和传统混凝土的抗压强度。18 个样本被分为两组,并在数据收集前进行了预处理。第一组使用玻璃粉代替细骨料,第二组是普通混凝土。样品的制备和检验需要使用各种工具和材料。预试验功率分别以 80% 和 95% 的置信区间(CI)确定。在细骨料中部分替代了 20% 的玻璃粉。利用万能试验机进行了压缩强度试验。使用 21 版 SPSS(社会科学统计软件包)软件进行了独立样本 t 检验。掺入创新玻璃粉的混凝土的平均抗压强度为 35.4978 牛顿/毫米 2,而传统混凝土的典型平均抗压强度为 34.2744 牛顿/毫米 2。分析结果采用独立样本 t 检验。显著性为 p = 0.000(p < 0.05)。这表明两种方法在统计上有显著差异。标准偏差分别为 1.6697、2.1529,标准误差分别为 0.3935、0.5074,平均值分别为 34.2744 N/mm 2、35.4978N/mm 2。通过这项实验研究发现,基于创新玻璃粉的 M30 级混凝土的抗压强度高于普通混凝土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NanoWorld Journal
NanoWorld Journal Materials Science-Polymers and Plastics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Marine Actinomycetes Siderophores: Types, High Throughput Characterization Techniques, Applications, and Their Association with Nanotechnology: A Comprehensive Review Efficacy of Metallic Nanoparticles and Nanocarriers as an Advanced Tool for Imaging and Diagnosis: Insight into Theranostic Applications Enrichment of Tensile Properties for AA7178/Nano ZrO2/Fly Ash Metal-matrix Composite via Novel Encapsulate Stir Casting Technique by Drilling Process Comparative Performance Analysis of Novel Single-slope Conventional Solar Still and Solar Still with Fe2O3 Water Nanofluids Through Experimental Investigation Investigation on Tribological Properties of AA5059 Reinforced Nano Kaolinite Metal Matrix Composite Using Novel Encapsulate Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1