An Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of M30 Concrete Using Seashell Powder and Eggshell Powder as a Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Comparison with Conventional Concrete

Q4 Materials Science NanoWorld Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-050
Pasupuleti Jaswanth, Ganesan Ramachandran
{"title":"An Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of M30 Concrete Using Seashell Powder and Eggshell Powder as a Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Comparison with Conventional Concrete","authors":"Pasupuleti Jaswanth, Ganesan Ramachandran","doi":"10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the research is to compare seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete and conventional concrete on the compressive strength. In this study, a total of 18 samples were divided into two groups and prepared for data collection. One is made with ordinary concrete, and the other with seashells and eggshells-based powder M30 concrete. To perform the independent sample t-test, SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software, version 21, was used. The seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete sample has a mean compressive strength of 38.00 N/mm 2 , whereas the conventional concrete test sample has a mean characteristics compressive strength of 33.73 N/mm 2 . Independent samples t-test is performed to analyze the results. When a significant difference is found between the two groups in an independent sample t-test and the G-power is 80% and p = 0.053 (p > 0.05), the independent sample t-test is run for both groups is not statistically significant. The standard deviation is 2.90452, 5.81220, and the standard error is 0.68460, 1.36995, with the mean value being 33.7294, 36.8378. From the experimental study results, it could be found that the seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete has more compressive strength than traditional concrete.","PeriodicalId":36802,"journal":{"name":"NanoWorld Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NanoWorld Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the research is to compare seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete and conventional concrete on the compressive strength. In this study, a total of 18 samples were divided into two groups and prepared for data collection. One is made with ordinary concrete, and the other with seashells and eggshells-based powder M30 concrete. To perform the independent sample t-test, SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software, version 21, was used. The seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete sample has a mean compressive strength of 38.00 N/mm 2 , whereas the conventional concrete test sample has a mean characteristics compressive strength of 33.73 N/mm 2 . Independent samples t-test is performed to analyze the results. When a significant difference is found between the two groups in an independent sample t-test and the G-power is 80% and p = 0.053 (p > 0.05), the independent sample t-test is run for both groups is not statistically significant. The standard deviation is 2.90452, 5.81220, and the standard error is 0.68460, 1.36995, with the mean value being 33.7294, 36.8378. From the experimental study results, it could be found that the seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete has more compressive strength than traditional concrete.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用贝壳粉和蛋壳粉部分替代细骨料的 M30 混凝土抗压强度与传统混凝土对比实验研究
研究的目的是比较基于贝壳和蛋壳粉的 M30 混凝土和传统混凝土的抗压强度。在这项研究中,共有 18 个样本被分为两组,并准备收集数据。一组使用普通混凝土,另一组使用贝壳和蛋壳粉 M30 混凝土。使用 21 版 SPSS(社会科学统计软件包)软件进行独立样本 t 检验。贝壳和蛋壳粉 M30 混凝土样本的平均抗压强度为 38.00 牛顿/毫米 2,而传统混凝土测试样本的平均抗压强度为 33.73 牛顿/毫米 2。对结果进行了独立样本 t 检验。当在独立样本 t 检验中发现两组之间存在显着差异,且 G 功率为 80%,p = 0.053(p > 0.05)时,对两组进行独立样本 t 检验在统计上并不显着。标准差为 2.90452、5.81220,标准误差为 0.68460、1.36995,平均值为 33.7294、36.8378。从实验研究结果可以看出,贝壳和蛋壳粉 M30 混凝土的抗压强度高于传统混凝土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NanoWorld Journal
NanoWorld Journal Materials Science-Polymers and Plastics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Marine Actinomycetes Siderophores: Types, High Throughput Characterization Techniques, Applications, and Their Association with Nanotechnology: A Comprehensive Review Efficacy of Metallic Nanoparticles and Nanocarriers as an Advanced Tool for Imaging and Diagnosis: Insight into Theranostic Applications Enrichment of Tensile Properties for AA7178/Nano ZrO2/Fly Ash Metal-matrix Composite via Novel Encapsulate Stir Casting Technique by Drilling Process Comparative Performance Analysis of Novel Single-slope Conventional Solar Still and Solar Still with Fe2O3 Water Nanofluids Through Experimental Investigation Investigation on Tribological Properties of AA5059 Reinforced Nano Kaolinite Metal Matrix Composite Using Novel Encapsulate Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1