The Legal Protection of the Digital Platform Workers in Indonesia: Lesson Learnd From Germany and the United Kingdom

Nur Afifah Aminuddin, Erna Dyah Kusumawati
{"title":"The Legal Protection of the Digital Platform Workers in Indonesia: Lesson Learnd From Germany and the United Kingdom","authors":"Nur Afifah Aminuddin, Erna Dyah Kusumawati","doi":"10.19184/ijls.v4i2.41915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes labor law arrangements in Indonesia, Germany and United Kingdom, mainly how several countries protect digital platform workers. Furthermore, this research evaluates the implementation of such a law to advance labor law in Indonesia in protecting digital platforms workers. This research used normative legal analysis, employing a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach with Germany and the United Kingdom. The results indicate that the dynamics of new employment status or partnership working relationships and workers’ flexibility in the gig economy phenomenon are not only found in Indonesia. Several countries, for example, Germany and United Kingdom, have found strategies to tackle this phenomenon. The government can address the above employment problems in two approaches: via court decisions and amending or revising relevant legislation. Classifying the status of employment relationships in this new phenomenon is crucial for implementation in Indonesia. In the future, such classification can be used as a reference in developing Indonesian Labor Law. The government should consider the necessary substantive protections for workers, from flexible working arrangements to creating new standards more responsive to the structure of growing organizations and the emergence of algorithmic management.","PeriodicalId":246079,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Law and Society","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/ijls.v4i2.41915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes labor law arrangements in Indonesia, Germany and United Kingdom, mainly how several countries protect digital platform workers. Furthermore, this research evaluates the implementation of such a law to advance labor law in Indonesia in protecting digital platforms workers. This research used normative legal analysis, employing a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach with Germany and the United Kingdom. The results indicate that the dynamics of new employment status or partnership working relationships and workers’ flexibility in the gig economy phenomenon are not only found in Indonesia. Several countries, for example, Germany and United Kingdom, have found strategies to tackle this phenomenon. The government can address the above employment problems in two approaches: via court decisions and amending or revising relevant legislation. Classifying the status of employment relationships in this new phenomenon is crucial for implementation in Indonesia. In the future, such classification can be used as a reference in developing Indonesian Labor Law. The government should consider the necessary substantive protections for workers, from flexible working arrangements to creating new standards more responsive to the structure of growing organizations and the emergence of algorithmic management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚对数字平台工作者的法律保护:德国和英国的经验教训
本研究分析了印度尼西亚、德国和英国的劳动法安排,主要分析了几个国家是如何保护数字平台工人的。此外,本研究还评估了此类法律的实施情况,以推动印尼劳动法在保护数字平台工作者方面的发展。本研究采用了规范性法律分析,运用了法定、概念和与德国和英国比较的方法。研究结果表明,在 "演出经济 "现象中,新就业身份或伙伴工作关系的动态变化以及工人的灵活性并非只存在于印度尼西亚。一些国家,如德国和英国,已经找到了应对这一现象的策略。政府可通过两种途径解决上述就业问题:一是法院判决,二是修订或修改相关法律。在这一新现象中,对雇佣关系的地位进行分类对印尼的实施工作至关重要。今后,在制定印尼《劳动法》时可将此类分类作为参考。政府应考虑为工人提供必要的实质性保护,从灵活的工作安排到制定新的标准,以更好地应对不断发展的组织结构和算法管理的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Embracing the Gig Economy The Legal Protection of the Digital Platform Workers in Indonesia: Lesson Learnd From Germany and the United Kingdom The Phenomenon of Child Marriage in the Pandemic Based on Legal, Social and Health Studies A Critical Evaluation of Environmental Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Bangladesh: Addressing Challenges and Insights When the Court Decisions Encourage Deforestation in Indonesia: A Case of Tahura Mangrove Forest Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1