Prometheus on Perelandra: The Inversion of the Satanic Hero in C.S. Lewis’s Perelandra

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal of Inklings Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.3366/ink.2023.0197
N. Fayard
{"title":"Prometheus on Perelandra: The Inversion of the Satanic Hero in C.S. Lewis’s Perelandra","authors":"N. Fayard","doi":"10.3366/ink.2023.0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approaching the character of Satan in A Preface to Paradise Lost, C.S. Lewis asserted that the Romantics’ admiration for Milton’s angelic rebel as a heroic figure was misplaced. It is a passing reference, but the comment revealed Lewis’s discomfort with the concept of the romantic hero. Two years later, he would continue his investigation of this archetype with his publication of Perelandra. While the way Lewis reworked facets of Miltonic’s Paradise Lost in his extra-terrestrial Garden of Eden have been well studied, the obvious sources for Lewis’s work loom so large in its scholarship that the similar reimagining of Romantic concepts and character types in which he engaged has received little attention. Yet the presence of Romantic echoes among all of the medieval allusions is quite telling. Lewis seems to make particular use of Shelly’s Prometheus Unbound, his favourite poem, in much the same way he does Paradise Lost, adapting that which he loved while ‘correcting’ that which he felt went wrong. This explores this recasting of Romantic concepts and observe Lewis’s efforts to bring the Byronic hero in line with the Christian cosmology of the Ransom trilogy, trying to paint a picture of authentically realized humanity.","PeriodicalId":37069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inklings Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inklings Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ink.2023.0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approaching the character of Satan in A Preface to Paradise Lost, C.S. Lewis asserted that the Romantics’ admiration for Milton’s angelic rebel as a heroic figure was misplaced. It is a passing reference, but the comment revealed Lewis’s discomfort with the concept of the romantic hero. Two years later, he would continue his investigation of this archetype with his publication of Perelandra. While the way Lewis reworked facets of Miltonic’s Paradise Lost in his extra-terrestrial Garden of Eden have been well studied, the obvious sources for Lewis’s work loom so large in its scholarship that the similar reimagining of Romantic concepts and character types in which he engaged has received little attention. Yet the presence of Romantic echoes among all of the medieval allusions is quite telling. Lewis seems to make particular use of Shelly’s Prometheus Unbound, his favourite poem, in much the same way he does Paradise Lost, adapting that which he loved while ‘correcting’ that which he felt went wrong. This explores this recasting of Romantic concepts and observe Lewis’s efforts to bring the Byronic hero in line with the Christian cosmology of the Ransom trilogy, trying to paint a picture of authentically realized humanity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佩兰德拉上的普罗米修斯:C.S.刘易斯《佩兰德拉》中撒旦英雄的反转
在谈到《失乐园序言》中的撒旦时,C.S. 刘易斯断言,浪漫主义者把弥尔顿笔下的天使叛逆者当作英雄形象来崇拜是错误的。虽然只是一笔带过,但这一评论揭示了刘易斯对浪漫主义英雄概念的不满。两年后,他出版了《佩里兰拉》,继续对这一原型进行研究。尽管刘易斯在他的外星伊甸园中对米尔顿尼克的《失乐园》进行再创作的方式已经得到了很好的研究,但刘易斯作品的明显来源在其学术研究中却显得如此重要,以至于他对浪漫主义概念和人物类型进行的类似再创作很少受到关注。然而,在所有的中世纪典故中,浪漫主义的呼应却很能说明问题。刘易斯似乎特别使用了他最喜欢的雪莱的《无束缚的普罗米修斯》(Prometheus Unbound),使用的方式与他使用《失乐园》的方式大致相同,在改编他喜欢的作品的同时,"纠正 "了他认为出错的地方。这本书探讨了这种对浪漫主义概念的重塑,并观察了刘易斯为使拜伦式英雄与《兰塞姆》三部曲中的基督教宇宙观保持一致所做的努力,他试图描绘一幅真实实现的人性图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inklings Studies
Journal of Inklings Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Holly Ordway, Tolkien’s Faith: A Spiritual Biography James E. Siburt, Myth, Magic, and Power in Tolkien’s Middle-earth: Developing a Model for Understanding Power and Leadership Adam Edward Carnehl, The Artist as Divine Symbol: Chesterton’s Theological Aesthetic Janka Kascakova and David Levente Palatinus (eds), J.R.R. Tolkien in Central Europe: Contexts, Directions, and the Legacy ‘He seems to be at the back of all the stories’: The Subtlety of Narnian Providence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1