Antimicrobial Activity of Traditional Medicinal Plant Extracts against Bacterial and Fungal Strains Causing Dental Caries: An in Vitro Study

R. Sheikhi, Zahra Rafat, Davoud Roostaei, N. Sharifi, Hamid Neshandar Asli, Rasoul Naseri
{"title":"Antimicrobial Activity of Traditional Medicinal Plant Extracts against Bacterial and Fungal Strains Causing Dental Caries: An in Vitro Study","authors":"R. Sheikhi, Zahra Rafat, Davoud Roostaei, N. Sharifi, Hamid Neshandar Asli, Rasoul Naseri","doi":"10.61186/iem.9.3.239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds: The use of plant extracts or their compounds as antimicrobial agents for oral infections worldwide represents that herbal medicines could be used as an effective alternative method in oral health care. This study aimed to evaluate the antifungal and antibacterial effects of five traditional medicinal plant extracts on standard and clinical strains of bacteria and fungi causing dental caries. Materials & Methods: Aqueous and methanolic extracts of Zataria multiflora, Lawsonia alba, Zizyphus spina-christi, Myrtus communis, and Citrus aurantium were prepared using maceration method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum microbicidal concentration (MMC) of the prepared extracts were evaluated against bacterial (Streptococcus sanguinis and S. mutans) and fungal (Candida albicans, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis) isolates using broth microdilution method. Findings: Aqueous extracts of the studied plants showed no antimicrobial effects on the studied microorganisms, except M. communis and C. aurantium. The results indicated the antimicrobial potency of the methanolic extract of M. communis (MIC range =2 to 64 µg/mL) against all the studied microorganisms, followed by Z. multiflora (MIC range = 512-2048 µg/ mL), L. alba (MIC range = 1024-2048 µg/mL), C. aurantium (MIC range = 1024-4096 µg/mL), and Z. spina-christi (MIC range=2048-˃4096 μg/mL). Also, the lowest MMCs against the studied strains were related to the methanolic extract of M. communis (MMC range = 16-512 µg/mL). Conclusion: The results showed remarkable antimicrobial effects of M. communis extract, which could be a suitable alternative to chemical mouthwashes to prevent and control oral infections.","PeriodicalId":34545,"journal":{"name":"Infection Epidemiology and Microbiology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Epidemiology and Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61186/iem.9.3.239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: The use of plant extracts or their compounds as antimicrobial agents for oral infections worldwide represents that herbal medicines could be used as an effective alternative method in oral health care. This study aimed to evaluate the antifungal and antibacterial effects of five traditional medicinal plant extracts on standard and clinical strains of bacteria and fungi causing dental caries. Materials & Methods: Aqueous and methanolic extracts of Zataria multiflora, Lawsonia alba, Zizyphus spina-christi, Myrtus communis, and Citrus aurantium were prepared using maceration method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum microbicidal concentration (MMC) of the prepared extracts were evaluated against bacterial (Streptococcus sanguinis and S. mutans) and fungal (Candida albicans, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis) isolates using broth microdilution method. Findings: Aqueous extracts of the studied plants showed no antimicrobial effects on the studied microorganisms, except M. communis and C. aurantium. The results indicated the antimicrobial potency of the methanolic extract of M. communis (MIC range =2 to 64 µg/mL) against all the studied microorganisms, followed by Z. multiflora (MIC range = 512-2048 µg/ mL), L. alba (MIC range = 1024-2048 µg/mL), C. aurantium (MIC range = 1024-4096 µg/mL), and Z. spina-christi (MIC range=2048-˃4096 μg/mL). Also, the lowest MMCs against the studied strains were related to the methanolic extract of M. communis (MMC range = 16-512 µg/mL). Conclusion: The results showed remarkable antimicrobial effects of M. communis extract, which could be a suitable alternative to chemical mouthwashes to prevent and control oral infections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统药用植物提取物对引起龋齿的细菌和真菌菌株的抗菌活性:体外研究
背景:全世界都在使用植物提取物或其化合物作为口腔感染的抗菌剂,这表明草药可作为口腔保健的一种有效替代方法。本研究旨在评估五种传统药用植物提取物对标准菌株和临床菌株中引起龋齿的细菌和真菌的抗真菌和抗细菌作用。材料与方法:采用浸渍法制备了多花荠属、白萝藦科植物白萝藦、刺五加、桃金娘和枳壳的水提取物和甲醇提取物。使用肉汤微稀释法评估了所制备提取物对细菌(血链球菌和变异链球菌)和真菌(白色念珠菌、克鲁塞念珠菌和热带念珠菌)分离物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MMC)。研究结果所研究植物的水提取物对所研究的微生物没有抗菌作用,但茜草和枳壳除外。结果表明,M. communis(MIC 范围 =2 至 64 µg/mL)的甲醇提取物对所有研究微生物都具有抗菌效力,其次是 Z. multiflora(MIC 范围 = 512-2048 µg/ mL)、L. alba(MIC 范围 = 1024-2048 µg/mL)、C. aurantium(MIC 范围 = 1024-4096 µg/mL)和 Z. spina-christi(MIC 范围=2048-˃4096 μg/mL)。此外,对所研究菌株的最低 MMC 值与 M. communis 的甲醇提取物有关(MMC 值范围 = 16-512 μg/mL)。结论结果表明,马钱子萃取物具有明显的抗菌效果,可作为化学漱口水的合适替代品,预防和控制口腔感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracing the Origin and Early Progression of COVID-19 in Europe: An Epidemiological Descriptive Study Exploring Antibiotic Susceptibility in Otomycosis: Uncovering Mixed Infections of Fungal and Bacterial Origin in Indonesia Antimicrobial Activity of Traditional Medicinal Plant Extracts against Bacterial and Fungal Strains Causing Dental Caries: An in Vitro Study Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum B-Lactamase (ESBL) and Quinolone Resistance (qnr) Genes among Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor-1-Producing Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Babylon, Iraq Association between Torque Teno Virus Frequency and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Potential Trigger for Autoimmune Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1