Acquisition of English nominal suffix -er by advanced EFL learners: a view from usage-based perspective

Q2 Arts and Humanities ExELL Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.2478/exell-2023-0005
Višnja Pavičić Takač, Gabrijela Buljan
{"title":"Acquisition of English nominal suffix -er by advanced EFL learners: a view from usage-based perspective","authors":"Višnja Pavičić Takač, Gabrijela Buljan","doi":"10.2478/exell-2023-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present study investigated advanced Croatian EFL learners’ knowledge of five meanings of the English nominal (deverbal) suffix -er. It probed their ability to comprehend and produce corpus-rare and presumably unentrenched -er nouns in their prototypical agent and instrument meanings and their non-prototypical patient, locative, and causative meanings. It was hypothesized that participants would deal effortlessly with agent and instrument meanings of the low-frequency nouns since the corpus-attested high type frequency of -er agents and instruments, among others, suggests the existence of productive corresponding schemas. We hypothesized that participants would struggle with patient, locative and causative meanings of the low-frequency nouns since the corpus-attested low type frequency of the three functions arguably does not support their association with -er. A recognition and a production test were administered to two separate groups of English majors at a Croatian public university (n = 131). Results confirm general usage-based predictions about better performance with low-frequency agent and instrument -er nouns. However, a detailed examination reveals unexpected results, which confirm that frequency, however important, is not the only factor to include in a future model of EFL learners’ derivational proficiency.","PeriodicalId":37072,"journal":{"name":"ExELL","volume":"56 1","pages":"1 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ExELL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/exell-2023-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The present study investigated advanced Croatian EFL learners’ knowledge of five meanings of the English nominal (deverbal) suffix -er. It probed their ability to comprehend and produce corpus-rare and presumably unentrenched -er nouns in their prototypical agent and instrument meanings and their non-prototypical patient, locative, and causative meanings. It was hypothesized that participants would deal effortlessly with agent and instrument meanings of the low-frequency nouns since the corpus-attested high type frequency of -er agents and instruments, among others, suggests the existence of productive corresponding schemas. We hypothesized that participants would struggle with patient, locative and causative meanings of the low-frequency nouns since the corpus-attested low type frequency of the three functions arguably does not support their association with -er. A recognition and a production test were administered to two separate groups of English majors at a Croatian public university (n = 131). Results confirm general usage-based predictions about better performance with low-frequency agent and instrument -er nouns. However, a detailed examination reveals unexpected results, which confirm that frequency, however important, is not the only factor to include in a future model of EFL learners’ derivational proficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级英语语言学习者对英语名词后缀-er的习得:基于用法的视角
摘要 本研究调查了克罗地亚高级英语语言学习者对英语名词后缀-er的五种含义的了解。研究探究了他们理解和生成语料库中罕见的、可能未被固定的-er名词的能力,包括其原型的代理和工具意义,以及非原型的患者、定位和因果意义。我们假设被试可以毫不费力地处理低频名词的代理人和工具意义,因为语料库中证实的-er 代理人和工具等的高类型频率表明存在相应的生产性图式。我们假设被试在处理低频名词的病人义、定位义和因果义时会很吃力,因为在语料库中,这三种功能的类型出现频率很低,可以说并不支持它们与-er 的关联。我们分别对克罗地亚一所公立大学的两组英语专业学生(n = 131)进行了认读和造句测试。结果证实了基于一般用法的预测,即低频的代理人和工具 -er 名词的成绩更好。然而,详细的研究揭示了意想不到的结果,证实了频率无论多么重要,都不是未来 EFL 学习者派生能力模型中应包含的唯一因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ExELL
ExELL Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clause complexing in research-article abstracts: Comparing human- and AI-generated texts Resilience in virtual education: Designing and validating a scale in higher education The power of metaphor in thesis writing process Homogeneity and heterogeneity in lexical stress placement among Ugandan speakers of English as an L2: a view from usage-based perspective Acquisition of English nominal suffix -er by advanced EFL learners: a view from usage-based perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1