Exploring Judicial Interpretation: Comparative Law Methodology and the Hybridisation Paradigm

Q2 Social Sciences Global Jurist Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1515/gj-2023-0119
Caterina Bergomi
{"title":"Exploring Judicial Interpretation: Comparative Law Methodology and the Hybridisation Paradigm","authors":"Caterina Bergomi","doi":"10.1515/gj-2023-0119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) interprets directives and regulations, forming what will be called a hybrid space where national legal systems and supranational elements converge, particularly when asserting the autonomy of a notion. Comparative law has supported legal norm harmonisation but has also revealed the diversity within legal systems, including the EU’s, through the study of legal formants. The goal of this contribution is to show how a comparative approach, incorporating the concept of hybridity from other disciplines, can aid in analysing autonomous interpretation and the influence of hybridisation on legal concepts and terminology.","PeriodicalId":34941,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurist","volume":"23 1","pages":"243 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Jurist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2023-0119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) interprets directives and regulations, forming what will be called a hybrid space where national legal systems and supranational elements converge, particularly when asserting the autonomy of a notion. Comparative law has supported legal norm harmonisation but has also revealed the diversity within legal systems, including the EU’s, through the study of legal formants. The goal of this contribution is to show how a comparative approach, incorporating the concept of hybridity from other disciplines, can aid in analysing autonomous interpretation and the influence of hybridisation on legal concepts and terminology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索司法解释:比较法方法论与混合范式
摘要 欧洲联盟法院(CJEU)对指令和法规进行解释,形成了一个被称为混合空间的地方,国家法律体系和超国家因素在此交汇,尤其是在主张概念自治时。比较法支持法律规范的统一,但也通过对法律形式的研究揭示了包括欧盟在内的法律体系内部的多样性。这篇论文的目的在于说明比较法如何结合其他学科的混合概念,帮助分析自主解释以及混合对法律概念和术语的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Jurist
Global Jurist Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Global Jurist offers a forum for scholarly cyber-debate on issues of comparative law, law and economics, international law, law and society, and legal anthropology. Edited by an international board of leading comparative law scholars from all the continents, Global Jurist is mindful of globalization and respectful of cultural differences. We will develop a truly international community of legal scholars where linguistic and cultural barriers are overcome and legal issues are finally discussed outside of the narrow limits imposed by positivism, parochialism, ethnocentrism, imperialism and chauvinism in the law. Submission is welcome from all over the world and particularly encouraged from the Global South.
期刊最新文献
‘The Food Must Reach the Hungry’: Lessons from Judicial Enforcement of Right to Food in India On the History of Water as a Human Right and Its Recognition in the Cuban Constitution Capitalising on Uncertainty: Exploring the Failure of International Law to Address the Risk Generated by the Proliferation of Space Debris Two Tales of the Energy Commons Through the Lens of Complexity Achieving a Common Future for all Through Sustainability-Conscious Legal Education and Research Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1