The First and Lowest Operation of Pain: C.S. Lewis and His Image of ‘God’s Megaphone’ for Human Suffering

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal of Inklings Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.3366/ink.2023.0198
A. Smilde
{"title":"The First and Lowest Operation of Pain: C.S. Lewis and His Image of ‘God’s Megaphone’ for Human Suffering","authors":"A. Smilde","doi":"10.3366/ink.2023.0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"C.S. Lewis’s metaphor of ‘God’s megaphone’, an image he employed to illustrate an idea about human suffering, appears at a certain stage of his argument in the central chapter (ch. 6) of his first work of popular theology, The Problem of Pain (1940). Among the numerous images invoked throughout his writings, none perhaps is more widely known than this. From the earliest book-length study of Lewis (1949) onward, numerous quotations, allusions, and discussions that include the image of the megaphone can be found in the literature on Lewis and elsewhere; in 1957 the Dutch translation of Lewis’s book was published under the title Gods megafoon. While it would take a comprehensive reception history of The Problem of Pain for any definitive claims to be possible, the history of the ‘megaphone’ as cited in the literature suggests that this image has dominated perceptions of the book’s overall argument. The present essay will attempt to show that this dominance is a fact, and argues that this dominance finds no support in Lewis’s original argument.","PeriodicalId":37069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inklings Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inklings Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ink.2023.0198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

C.S. Lewis’s metaphor of ‘God’s megaphone’, an image he employed to illustrate an idea about human suffering, appears at a certain stage of his argument in the central chapter (ch. 6) of his first work of popular theology, The Problem of Pain (1940). Among the numerous images invoked throughout his writings, none perhaps is more widely known than this. From the earliest book-length study of Lewis (1949) onward, numerous quotations, allusions, and discussions that include the image of the megaphone can be found in the literature on Lewis and elsewhere; in 1957 the Dutch translation of Lewis’s book was published under the title Gods megafoon. While it would take a comprehensive reception history of The Problem of Pain for any definitive claims to be possible, the history of the ‘megaphone’ as cited in the literature suggests that this image has dominated perceptions of the book’s overall argument. The present essay will attempt to show that this dominance is a fact, and argues that this dominance finds no support in Lewis’s original argument.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痛苦的最初和最低运作:C.S. Lewis 及其对人类痛苦的 "上帝扩音器 "形象
路易斯(C.S. Lewis)在其第一部通俗神学著作《痛苦的问题》(1940 年)的中心章节(第 6 章)中,在论证的某一阶段使用了 "上帝的扩音器 "这一隐喻,他用这一形象来说明有关人类痛苦的观点。在他著作中引用的众多形象中,也许没有一个比这更广为人知。从最早的关于刘易斯的长篇研究(1949 年)开始,在关于刘易斯的文献和其他文献中可以找到大量包含扩音器形象的引文、典故和讨论;1957 年,刘易斯著作的荷兰语译本以 Gods megafoon 为题出版。虽然要对《痛苦的问题》的接受史进行全面的研究才能得出明确的结论,但文献中引用的 "传声筒 "的历史表明,这一形象主导了人们对该书整体论点的看法。本文将试图说明这种主导地位是事实,并论证这种主导地位在刘易斯的原始论点中找不到支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inklings Studies
Journal of Inklings Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Holly Ordway, Tolkien’s Faith: A Spiritual Biography James E. Siburt, Myth, Magic, and Power in Tolkien’s Middle-earth: Developing a Model for Understanding Power and Leadership Adam Edward Carnehl, The Artist as Divine Symbol: Chesterton’s Theological Aesthetic Janka Kascakova and David Levente Palatinus (eds), J.R.R. Tolkien in Central Europe: Contexts, Directions, and the Legacy ‘He seems to be at the back of all the stories’: The Subtlety of Narnian Providence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1