Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of pancreatectomy with arterial resection in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kang Xue, Xing Huang, Pengcheng Zhao, Yi Zhang, Bole Tian
{"title":"Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of pancreatectomy with arterial resection in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Kang Xue, Xing Huang, Pengcheng Zhao, Yi Zhang, Bole Tian","doi":"10.1097/js9.0000000000000742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pancreatic cancer frequently involves the surrounding major arteries, preventing surgeons from making a radical excision. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) can lessen the size of local tumors and eliminate potential micrommetastases. However, systematic and evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of arterial resection (AR) after NAT in pancreatic cancer are scarce. Method: A computerized search of the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Clinicaltrials was performed to identify studies reporting the outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with AR and NAT for pancreatic cancer. Studies that reported perioperative and/or long-term results after pancreatectomy with AR and NAT were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the evidence was assessed with Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Form of bias tool. Data were pooled and analyzed by Stata 14.0 software. Result: Nine studies with an overall sample size of 215 met our eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. All studies were retrospective studies, and the methodological quality was moderate. The pooled morbidity and mortality rates were 51% (95% CI: 41–61%; I²= 0.0%) and 2% (95% CI: 0–0.08; I²=33.3%), respectively. Meta-analysis showed that the overall R0 resection rate was 79% (CI: 70–86%, I²=15.5%). Comparative data on R0 rates of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with and without NAT showed a significant difference in favor of the former group with moderate statistical heterogeneity (Relative risk=1.21; 95% CI: 0.776–1.915; I²=48.0%). The median 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients who had AR were 92.3% (range: 72.7–100%), 64.8% (range: 25–78.8%), 51.6% (range: 16.7–63.6%), and 14% (range: 0–41.1%), respectively. Data on median progression-free survival ranged from 5.25 to 36.3 months, and the median overall survival ranged from 17 to 44.9 months. Conclusions: Pancreatectomy with major AR following NAT has the potential to enhance the survival rate of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer involving the arteries by achieving R0 resection, despite a significant risk of postoperative complications. However, to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of this procedure, prospective controlled studies are necessary to address limitations arising from small sample sizes and potential biases inherent in retrospective studies.","PeriodicalId":297147,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)","volume":"50 1","pages":"4309 - 4321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000000742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer frequently involves the surrounding major arteries, preventing surgeons from making a radical excision. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) can lessen the size of local tumors and eliminate potential micrommetastases. However, systematic and evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of arterial resection (AR) after NAT in pancreatic cancer are scarce. Method: A computerized search of the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Clinicaltrials was performed to identify studies reporting the outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with AR and NAT for pancreatic cancer. Studies that reported perioperative and/or long-term results after pancreatectomy with AR and NAT were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the evidence was assessed with Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Form of bias tool. Data were pooled and analyzed by Stata 14.0 software. Result: Nine studies with an overall sample size of 215 met our eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. All studies were retrospective studies, and the methodological quality was moderate. The pooled morbidity and mortality rates were 51% (95% CI: 41–61%; I²= 0.0%) and 2% (95% CI: 0–0.08; I²=33.3%), respectively. Meta-analysis showed that the overall R0 resection rate was 79% (CI: 70–86%, I²=15.5%). Comparative data on R0 rates of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with and without NAT showed a significant difference in favor of the former group with moderate statistical heterogeneity (Relative risk=1.21; 95% CI: 0.776–1.915; I²=48.0%). The median 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients who had AR were 92.3% (range: 72.7–100%), 64.8% (range: 25–78.8%), 51.6% (range: 16.7–63.6%), and 14% (range: 0–41.1%), respectively. Data on median progression-free survival ranged from 5.25 to 36.3 months, and the median overall survival ranged from 17 to 44.9 months. Conclusions: Pancreatectomy with major AR following NAT has the potential to enhance the survival rate of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer involving the arteries by achieving R0 resection, despite a significant risk of postoperative complications. However, to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of this procedure, prospective controlled studies are necessary to address limitations arising from small sample sizes and potential biases inherent in retrospective studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新辅助治疗后对边缘可切除或局部晚期胰腺癌行胰腺切除术加动脉切除术的围手术期和长期生存结果:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:胰腺癌经常累及周围的大动脉,使外科医生无法进行根治性切除。新辅助治疗(NAT)可以缩小局部肿瘤的大小,消除潜在的微转移灶。然而,关于胰腺癌新辅助治疗后动脉切除术(AR)的治疗方法,目前还缺乏系统的循证建议。方法:对 Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library 数据库和 Clinicaltrials 进行计算机检索,以确定报告胰腺癌患者接受 AR 和 NAT 的胰腺切除术后疗效的研究。符合纳入条件的研究报告了使用 AR 和 NAT 进行胰腺切除术后的围手术期和/或长期结果。证据质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华偏倚质量评估表工具进行评估。使用 Stata 14.0 软件对数据进行汇总和分析。结果共有 9 项研究(样本量为 215 个)符合我们的资格标准,并被纳入荟萃分析。所有研究均为回顾性研究,方法学质量中等。汇总的发病率和死亡率分别为 51% (95% CI: 41-61%; I²= 0.0%) 和 2% (95% CI: 0-0.08; I²= 33.3%)。元分析显示,R0切除率总体为79%(CI:70-86%,I²=15.5%)。有NAT和无NAT胰腺切除术患者的R0率比较数据显示,前者的R0率明显高于后者,但存在中度统计学异质性(相对风险=1.21;95% CI:0.776-1.915;I²=48.0%)。AR患者的中位1年、2年、3年和5年生存率分别为92.3%(范围:72.7-100%)、64.8%(范围:25-78.8%)、51.6%(范围:16.7-63.6%)和14%(范围:0-41.1%)。中位无进展生存期数据从 5.25 个月到 36.3 个月不等,中位总生存期从 17 个月到 44.9 个月不等。结论尽管术后并发症的风险很大,但NAT术后的胰腺切除加主要AR术有可能通过实现R0切除提高动脉受累的不可切除胰腺癌患者的生存率。然而,为了验证该手术的可行性和有效性,有必要进行前瞻性对照研究,以解决因样本量小和回顾性研究固有的潜在偏差而产生的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of pancreatectomy with arterial resection in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Association of systemic inflammatory markers and tertiary lymphoid structure with pathological complete response in gastric cancer patients receiving preoperative treatment: a retrospective cohort study The percentage of unnecessary mastectomy due to false size prediction using preoperative ultrasonography and MRI in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study Different therapeutic regimens in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer A novel skin grafting modality: prefabricated large sheet of postage-stamp autografts and allografts to repair extensive burn wounds; a prospective matched-control study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1