A Comparative Study of MobileNet Architecture Optimizer for Crowd Prediction

Permana langgeng wicaksono ellwid Putra, Muhammad Naufal, Erwin Yudi Hidayat
{"title":"A Comparative Study of MobileNet Architecture Optimizer for Crowd Prediction","authors":"Permana langgeng wicaksono ellwid Putra, Muhammad Naufal, Erwin Yudi Hidayat","doi":"10.30591/jpit.v8i3.5703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence technology has grown quickly in recent years. Convolutional neural network (CNN) technology has also been developed as a result of these developments. However, because convolutional neural networks entail several calculations and the optimization of numerous matrices, their application necessitates the utilization of appropriate technology, such as GPUs or other accelerators. Applying transfer learning techniques is one way to get around this resource barrier. MobileNetV2 is an example of a lightweight convolutional neural network architecture that is appropriate for transfer learning. The objective of the research is to compare the performance of SGD and Adam using the MobileNetv2 convolutional neural network architecture. Model training uses a learning rate of 0.0001, batch size of 32, and binary cross-entropy as the loss function. The training process is carried out for 100 epochs with the application of early stop and patience for 10 epochs. Result of this research is both models using Adam's optimizer and SGD show good capability in crowd classification. However, the model with the SGD optimizer has a slightly superior performance even with less accuracy than model with Adam optimizer. Which is model with Adam has accuracy 96%, while the model with SGD has 95% accuracy. This is because in the graphical results model with the SGD optimizer shows better stability than the model with the Adam optimizer. The loss graph and accuracy graph of the SGD model are more consistent and tend to experience lower fluctuations than the Adam model.","PeriodicalId":503683,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30591/jpit.v8i3.5703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technology has grown quickly in recent years. Convolutional neural network (CNN) technology has also been developed as a result of these developments. However, because convolutional neural networks entail several calculations and the optimization of numerous matrices, their application necessitates the utilization of appropriate technology, such as GPUs or other accelerators. Applying transfer learning techniques is one way to get around this resource barrier. MobileNetV2 is an example of a lightweight convolutional neural network architecture that is appropriate for transfer learning. The objective of the research is to compare the performance of SGD and Adam using the MobileNetv2 convolutional neural network architecture. Model training uses a learning rate of 0.0001, batch size of 32, and binary cross-entropy as the loss function. The training process is carried out for 100 epochs with the application of early stop and patience for 10 epochs. Result of this research is both models using Adam's optimizer and SGD show good capability in crowd classification. However, the model with the SGD optimizer has a slightly superior performance even with less accuracy than model with Adam optimizer. Which is model with Adam has accuracy 96%, while the model with SGD has 95% accuracy. This is because in the graphical results model with the SGD optimizer shows better stability than the model with the Adam optimizer. The loss graph and accuracy graph of the SGD model are more consistent and tend to experience lower fluctuations than the Adam model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于人群预测的 MobileNet 架构优化器比较研究
近年来,人工智能技术发展迅速。卷积神经网络(CNN)技术也因这些发展而得到了发展。然而,由于卷积神经网络需要进行多次计算并对大量矩阵进行优化,因此其应用需要利用适当的技术,如 GPU 或其他加速器。应用迁移学习技术是绕过这一资源障碍的方法之一。MobileNetV2 就是适合迁移学习的轻量级卷积神经网络架构的一个例子。本研究的目的是比较使用 MobileNetv2 卷积神经网络架构的 SGD 和 Adam 的性能。模型训练使用的学习率为 0.0001,批量大小为 32,损失函数为二元交叉熵。训练过程进行了 100 个历元,并提前停止和耐心等待 10 个历元。研究结果表明,使用亚当优化器和 SGD 的模型在人群分类中都表现出了良好的能力。不过,与使用亚当优化器的模型相比,使用 SGD 优化器的模型即使准确率较低,性能也略胜一筹。其中,使用 Adam 优化器的模型准确率为 96%,而使用 SGD 优化器的模型准确率为 95%。这是因为在图形结果中,使用 SGD 优化器的模型比使用 Adam 优化器的模型显示出更好的稳定性。与 Adam 模型相比,SGD 模型的损失图和精确度图更加一致,波动也更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teknologi Deteksi Dini Banjir Daerah Aliran Sungai menggunakan Heltec Wifi LoRa 32 V2 Sistem Diagnosa Penyakit Liver Menggunakan Metode Artificial Neural Network: Studi Berdasarkan Dataset Indian Liver Patient Dataset Rancang Bangun Aplikasi Diet untuk Ibu Menyusui Pasca Persalinan dengan Algoritma Mifflin-St Jeor Penyesuaian Model Ketahanan Siber Umkm Di Indonesia Dengan Nist Cybersecurity Framework Pemanfaatan Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) dalam Peningkatan Produktivitas Peternakan melalui Monitoring Otomatis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1