An Assessment of the Effectiveness of an Intervention to Quit Tobacco Use in Patients Seek Treatment from the Institute of Oral Health, Maharagama, Sri Lanka

Hemantha Amarasinghe, Wfd Ananda, Skd Hariachandra, Radg Subashani, KS Wipularathna, Asf Nadira, Ruwan D. Jayasinghe
{"title":"An Assessment of the Effectiveness of an Intervention to Quit Tobacco Use in Patients Seek Treatment from the Institute of Oral Health, Maharagama, Sri Lanka","authors":"Hemantha Amarasinghe, Wfd Ananda, Skd Hariachandra, Radg Subashani, KS Wipularathna, Asf Nadira, Ruwan D. Jayasinghe","doi":"10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.3.529-532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tobacco is consumed in both smoked and smokeless forms. STEP Survey Sri Lanka 2015 showed that 29.4% males and 0.1% females were current smokers, Smokeless Tobacco (SLT) use was found in 26% of males and 5% of females. Dental setting could be considered as a suitable venue to provide brief health education message to persuade quit from tobacco. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of brief intervention among tobacco users attending the Institute of Oral Health, Maharagama, Sri Lanka. Methods: Dental Surgeons provide routine care for the patients at the OPD and assess the use of tobacco at the beginning and help patients to quit tobacco which takes only 3-5 minutes. Method of intervention of this study is to provide brief messages to quit tobacco based on oral health effects due to tobacco use: staining teeth, status of periodontal health, halitosis, smoker’s keratosis, whiteness (burning) of the mucosa and palate and chewer’s mucosa. Tobacco quit rate and attempts were assessed through the telephone conversation in 3 months, 6 months intervals. Results: One hundred and twenty eighty subjects were recruited for the study, 45 (35%) failed to contact after 6 months interval which yielded the total sample of 83. Among 73 betel chewers, 46 (63%) subjects were completely quit the habit after 6 months. Eight out of 10 subjects who chew betel quid more than 5 quid per day quit. Among 22 smokers, 7 (32%) completely quit smoking with brief intervention at dental setting. Conclusion: Brief intervention at dental setting immensely helps to quit habit of daily betel chewers. This is an ongoing study relatively larger sample is needed for confirmation of the findings.","PeriodicalId":502165,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcc.2023.8.3.529-532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tobacco is consumed in both smoked and smokeless forms. STEP Survey Sri Lanka 2015 showed that 29.4% males and 0.1% females were current smokers, Smokeless Tobacco (SLT) use was found in 26% of males and 5% of females. Dental setting could be considered as a suitable venue to provide brief health education message to persuade quit from tobacco. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of brief intervention among tobacco users attending the Institute of Oral Health, Maharagama, Sri Lanka. Methods: Dental Surgeons provide routine care for the patients at the OPD and assess the use of tobacco at the beginning and help patients to quit tobacco which takes only 3-5 minutes. Method of intervention of this study is to provide brief messages to quit tobacco based on oral health effects due to tobacco use: staining teeth, status of periodontal health, halitosis, smoker’s keratosis, whiteness (burning) of the mucosa and palate and chewer’s mucosa. Tobacco quit rate and attempts were assessed through the telephone conversation in 3 months, 6 months intervals. Results: One hundred and twenty eighty subjects were recruited for the study, 45 (35%) failed to contact after 6 months interval which yielded the total sample of 83. Among 73 betel chewers, 46 (63%) subjects were completely quit the habit after 6 months. Eight out of 10 subjects who chew betel quid more than 5 quid per day quit. Among 22 smokers, 7 (32%) completely quit smoking with brief intervention at dental setting. Conclusion: Brief intervention at dental setting immensely helps to quit habit of daily betel chewers. This is an ongoing study relatively larger sample is needed for confirmation of the findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡马哈拉加马口腔健康研究所戒烟干预措施的效果评估
背景:烟草以吸烟和无烟两种形式消费。2015年斯里兰卡STEP调查显示,29.4%的男性和0.1%的女性目前是吸烟者,26%的男性和5%的女性使用无烟烟草(SLT)。牙科环境可被视为提供简短健康教育信息以劝导戒烟的合适场所。本研究旨在评估在斯里兰卡马哈拉加马口腔健康研究所就诊的烟草使用者中进行简短干预的效果。研究方法牙科医生在口腔科门诊为患者提供常规护理,并在开始时评估烟草使用情况,帮助患者戒烟只需 3-5 分钟。本研究的干预方法是根据烟草使用对口腔健康的影响提供简短的戒烟信息:牙齿着色、牙周健康状况、口臭、吸烟者角化病、粘膜和腭部变白(灼伤)以及咀嚼者粘膜。通过 3 个月和 6 个月的电话交谈评估戒烟率和戒烟尝试。结果研究共招募了 128 名受试者,其中 45 人(35%)在 6 个月后未能联系上,因此样本总数为 83 人。在 73 名咀嚼槟榔的受试者中,46 人(63%)在 6 个月后完全戒掉了咀嚼槟榔的习惯。每天咀嚼槟榔超过5英镑的受试者中,10人中有8人戒烟。在 22 名吸烟者中,有 7 人(32%)在牙科机构的简短干预下完全戒烟。结论牙科机构的简短干预对戒除每天嚼槟榔者的习惯大有帮助。这是一项正在进行的研究,需要更多的样本来证实研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiotherapy Administration Checklist for Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: Development and Validation Paediatric Mesenchymal Hamartoma of Liver-A Diagnostic Dilemma External Beam Radiotherapy for Dysphagia Palliation in Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Prospective Study Management and Immediate Outcome of Common Pediatric Oncological Emergencies from a Single Centre Factors Affecting the Survival of Patients with Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital in Indonesia: A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1