The Scope of Public Accountability of the Army and Judiciary in Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Amir Mahmood, Prof. Dr Shazia N. Qureshi
{"title":"The Scope of Public Accountability of the Army and Judiciary in Islamic Republic of Pakistan","authors":"Amir Mahmood, Prof. Dr Shazia N. Qureshi","doi":"10.53762/alqamar.06.03.e03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public accountability in any democratic state appears to be the hallmark of the rule of law and supremacy of the Constitution.[i] This process should equally encompass not only the individuals but also the State institutions because it would ensure the presence of the rule of law in the system wherein both shall be treated alike.[ii] The public accountability of the State institutions is necessary because the resources entrusted and the powers vested to these institutions for utilizing such resources being the sacred trust, must not remain unaccountable in the public interest.[iii] The misuse of public resources will not only blur the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of the United Nations but will also jeopardize the valuable human rights of the citizens. The processes of accountability prevailing in the two most potent contending State institutions in Pakistan, i.e., the army and the judiciary, were examined to assess whether the forms of public accountability present in such cases are sufficient. This paper explored the significant forms of accountability present in the hierarchy of these two institutions. The army was found vertically and financially accountable, making it a disciplined institution. The case study of the judiciary demonstrates that the applicable forms of accountability fail. The judiciary protects citizens' rights and is directly linked with society. The law-and-order situation in the country is at stake due to the lack of real accountability in this institution. This position has frustrated society and infused a sense of fear, disappointment and insecurity that eventually threatened the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of the United Nations.   [i] Holcombe, R. G.,“Checks and Balances: Enforcing Constitutional Constraints”. Economies 6 no. 4(2018): 57. [ii] The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. (1973). Article 25. [iii] The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. (1973). Articles 170 & 171.","PeriodicalId":165966,"journal":{"name":"Al-Qamar","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Qamar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53762/alqamar.06.03.e03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public accountability in any democratic state appears to be the hallmark of the rule of law and supremacy of the Constitution.[i] This process should equally encompass not only the individuals but also the State institutions because it would ensure the presence of the rule of law in the system wherein both shall be treated alike.[ii] The public accountability of the State institutions is necessary because the resources entrusted and the powers vested to these institutions for utilizing such resources being the sacred trust, must not remain unaccountable in the public interest.[iii] The misuse of public resources will not only blur the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of the United Nations but will also jeopardize the valuable human rights of the citizens. The processes of accountability prevailing in the two most potent contending State institutions in Pakistan, i.e., the army and the judiciary, were examined to assess whether the forms of public accountability present in such cases are sufficient. This paper explored the significant forms of accountability present in the hierarchy of these two institutions. The army was found vertically and financially accountable, making it a disciplined institution. The case study of the judiciary demonstrates that the applicable forms of accountability fail. The judiciary protects citizens' rights and is directly linked with society. The law-and-order situation in the country is at stake due to the lack of real accountability in this institution. This position has frustrated society and infused a sense of fear, disappointment and insecurity that eventually threatened the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of the United Nations.   [i] Holcombe, R. G.,“Checks and Balances: Enforcing Constitutional Constraints”. Economies 6 no. 4(2018): 57. [ii] The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. (1973). Article 25. [iii] The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. (1973). Articles 170 & 171.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦伊斯兰共和国军队和司法机构的公共问责范围
在任何民主国家,公众问责似乎都是法治和宪法至高无上的标志。[i] 这一过程不仅应同样包括个人,也应包括国家机构,因为这将确保法治制度的存在,而在这一制度中, 个人和机构应受到同等对待。[ii]国家机构的公共问责制是必要的,因为委托给这些机构的资源和赋予这些机构使用这些资源的权力是神圣的信任,为了公众的利益,绝不能不负责任。[iii]滥用公共资源不仅会模糊联合国 2030 年可持续发展议程,而且会损害公民宝贵的人权。本文研究了巴基斯坦军队和司法机构这两个最有争议的国家机构中普遍存在的问责程序,以评估在这种情况下存在的公共问责形式是否充分。本文探讨了这两个机构的等级制度中存在的重要问责形式。研究发现,军队在纵向和财政上都负有责任,使其成为一个纪律严明的机构。对司法机构的案例研究表明,适用的问责形式是失败的。司法机构保护公民权利,与社会直接相关。由于该机构缺乏真正的问责制,国家的治安状况岌岌可危。这种状况使社会感到沮丧,并产生了恐惧、失望和不安全感,最终威胁到联合国 2030 年可持续发展议程。 [i] Holcombe, R. G., "Checks and Balances:Enforcing Constitutional Constraints".Economies 6 no. 4(2018):57.[ii] The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan.(1973).Article 25.[iii] The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan.(1973).第 170 和 171 条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Significance of Nahj-ul-Balaghah in the Development of Muslim Theosophy: An Analytical Exposition سید سلیمان ندوی بحیثیت سیرت نگار: ایک تحقیقی جائزہ Electoral Performance of Religiopolitical Alliance (IJI) in Election 1988: An Assessment تبلیغی جماعت کے ذرائع تبلیغ کا تحقیقی جائزہ فنون لطیفہ اور فکرِ اقبال : ایک مطالعہ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1