Individual Psychology as Second-Person Psychology: Heinz L. and Rowena R. Ansbacher Memorial Lecture

Marina Bluvshtein
{"title":"Individual Psychology as Second-Person Psychology: Heinz L. and Rowena R. Ansbacher Memorial Lecture","authors":"Marina Bluvshtein","doi":"10.1353/jip.2023.a909956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Exploring the membership archives of the North American Society of Adlerian Psychology (NASAP, initially ASAP) from 1952 until the early 2000s revealed many hidden treasures. The applications from the 1950s to the 1980s, most completed by hand, share applicants’ reasons for joining, their education and training background in Individual Psychology, their fields of interest, and their professional activities. Early files also contain letters of reference, each ending with a confirmation that an “applicant’s orientation can be classified as Adlerian” or a similar endorsement. This article presents the demographic profiles of the 6,357 NASAP applicants between 1952 and 2009, focusing on professional identity, theoretical orientation, and commitment to Adlerian values, as expressed in these application materials. The second-person interactions that were prominent and popular in the Adlerian movement in the United States through the 1990s—teaching, correspondence, mentorship, open forums, and other you-focused activities—likely contributed to high NASAP membership numbers between 1952 and the early 1990s.","PeriodicalId":508530,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Individual Psychology","volume":"2012 1","pages":"196 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Individual Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2023.a909956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Exploring the membership archives of the North American Society of Adlerian Psychology (NASAP, initially ASAP) from 1952 until the early 2000s revealed many hidden treasures. The applications from the 1950s to the 1980s, most completed by hand, share applicants’ reasons for joining, their education and training background in Individual Psychology, their fields of interest, and their professional activities. Early files also contain letters of reference, each ending with a confirmation that an “applicant’s orientation can be classified as Adlerian” or a similar endorsement. This article presents the demographic profiles of the 6,357 NASAP applicants between 1952 and 2009, focusing on professional identity, theoretical orientation, and commitment to Adlerian values, as expressed in these application materials. The second-person interactions that were prominent and popular in the Adlerian movement in the United States through the 1990s—teaching, correspondence, mentorship, open forums, and other you-focused activities—likely contributed to high NASAP membership numbers between 1952 and the early 1990s.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为第二人称心理学的个体心理学:Heinz L. and Rowena R. Ansbacher 纪念讲座
摘要:通过对北美阿德勒心理学会(NASAP,最初称 ASAP)从 1952 年到 21 世纪初的会员档案的探索,我们发现了许多隐藏的宝藏。从 20 世纪 50 年代到 80 年代的入会申请书大多是手工填写的,其中包含申请者的入会理由、个人心理学教育和培训背景、兴趣领域以及专业活动。早期的档案还包含推荐信,每封推荐信的结尾都确认 "申请人的取向可归类为阿德勒式 "或类似的认可。本文介绍了 1952 年至 2009 年间 6357 名 NASAP 申请者的人口统计学特征,重点关注这些申请材料中所表达的专业身份、理论取向以及对阿德勒价值观的承诺。阿德勒运动在美国一直到 20 世纪 90 年代都非常突出和流行的第二人称互动--教学、通信、导师制、公开论坛和其他以你为中心的活动--很可能是 1952 年至 20 世纪 90 年代初 NASAP 会员人数居高不下的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Adlerian Model: Core Theoretical Components Early Recollections and the Use of Artificial Intelligence Can EMDR Complement Adlerian Play Therapy? The Lifestyle of Vladimir Putin Professional Publications: Changes and Implications for NASAP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1