Religion and Philosophy Affected Stigma against Mental Illness and Impact on the Mental Health Care in India and China

Anita Jacob, K. Sneed, Yashwant Pathak
{"title":"Religion and Philosophy Affected Stigma against Mental Illness and Impact on the Mental Health Care in India and China","authors":"Anita Jacob, K. Sneed, Yashwant Pathak","doi":"10.33425/2639-9474.1247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mental illness has been a prevalent issue around the world however; an existing stigma against mental illness is preventing the development of proper mental health care and resources. This phenomenon is seen in the countries of India and China. Considering a stigma is developed within the society based on some beliefs upheld by the general population, it was in the best interest to investigate religions and philosophies that people in both China and India follow and uphold. This paper aims to answer the research question of “In what ways has religion and philosophy, specifically Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism, affected stigma against mental illness and thus the available mental health care in India and China?”. Through research done on the four religions/philosophies, certain connections could be made. In India, Hinduism views mental illness as a result of a lack of faith and adherence to rituals. In Islam, mental illness is also believed to be due to a lack of faith. Such negative views of mental health could be contributing to the large treatment gap in India. In China, Confucianism seems to be the reason why a mental illness stigma exists. Confucianism emphasizes adherence to societal views, even if that means suppressing emotion. This causes people to look down upon mental illness and justifies people staying away from those with mental illnesses rather than helping them. On the other hand, Buddhism, the majority religion/philosophy in China, seeks to reduce mental health stigma. Buddhist beliefs could be the cause of the increase in demand for mental health care. The connections made are beneficial to understanding the root of mental health stigma and can be used in the future to combat the stigma and start increasing awareness and available mental health care.","PeriodicalId":158343,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Primary Care","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9474.1247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mental illness has been a prevalent issue around the world however; an existing stigma against mental illness is preventing the development of proper mental health care and resources. This phenomenon is seen in the countries of India and China. Considering a stigma is developed within the society based on some beliefs upheld by the general population, it was in the best interest to investigate religions and philosophies that people in both China and India follow and uphold. This paper aims to answer the research question of “In what ways has religion and philosophy, specifically Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism, affected stigma against mental illness and thus the available mental health care in India and China?”. Through research done on the four religions/philosophies, certain connections could be made. In India, Hinduism views mental illness as a result of a lack of faith and adherence to rituals. In Islam, mental illness is also believed to be due to a lack of faith. Such negative views of mental health could be contributing to the large treatment gap in India. In China, Confucianism seems to be the reason why a mental illness stigma exists. Confucianism emphasizes adherence to societal views, even if that means suppressing emotion. This causes people to look down upon mental illness and justifies people staying away from those with mental illnesses rather than helping them. On the other hand, Buddhism, the majority religion/philosophy in China, seeks to reduce mental health stigma. Buddhist beliefs could be the cause of the increase in demand for mental health care. The connections made are beneficial to understanding the root of mental health stigma and can be used in the future to combat the stigma and start increasing awareness and available mental health care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教和哲学对印度和中国精神疾病污名化的影响以及对精神卫生保健的影响
精神疾病一直是全世界普遍存在的问题,然而,对精神疾病的成见阻碍了适当的精神卫生保健和资源的发展。这种现象在印度和中国都有所体现。考虑到社会中的成见是基于普通民众所坚持的一些信仰而形成的,因此调查中印两国人民所遵循和坚持的宗教和哲学是最符合他们的利益的。本文旨在回答 "宗教和哲学,特别是伊斯兰教、印度教、佛教和儒教,在哪些方面影响了印度和中国对精神疾病的成见,从而影响了精神健康医疗服务?"这一研究问题。通过对这四种宗教/哲学的研究,我们可以发现其中的某些联系。在印度,印度教认为精神病是缺乏信仰和不遵守仪式的结果。伊斯兰教也认为精神疾病是由于缺乏信仰造成的。这种对心理健康的负面看法可能是造成印度治疗缺口巨大的原因。在中国,儒家思想似乎是精神疾病耻辱化存在的原因。儒家思想强调遵守社会观念,即使这意味着压抑情感。这导致人们看不起精神病患者,并为人们远离精神病患者而不是帮助他们提供了理由。另一方面,佛教作为中国的主要宗教/哲学,致力于减少精神疾病的耻辱感。佛教信仰可能是心理健康护理需求增加的原因。这些联系有助于了解心理健康污名化的根源,并可在未来用于消除污名化,开始提高人们对心理健康的认识,并提供更多的心理保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Functional Outcome after Lateral Surgical Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty Enhancing Knowledge of Registered Nurses Working in the Primary Care Setting CAUTI Elimination: A Systematic Elimination of CAUTI in Long-Term Care Facility Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients’ Needs Assessment in Primary Care Setting: The Quiddity of Attitude in Quality Improvement Oversight on Revision of US CDC Opioid Guidelines: A Process Pre- Destined to Fail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1