Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics of Invasive Papillary Carcinoma with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and their survival outcome

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Polish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0053.7691
V. Zangouri, Negin Nourinejad, Souzan Soufizadeh Balaneji, Ali Ghaeini Hesarooeih, Seyed Amin Mousavi, Aliey Ranjbar, Morteza Amestejani, M. Ghoddusi Johari, M. Shariat, Maral Mokhtari
{"title":"Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics of Invasive Papillary Carcinoma with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and their survival outcome","authors":"V. Zangouri, Negin Nourinejad, Souzan Soufizadeh Balaneji, Ali Ghaeini Hesarooeih, Seyed Amin Mousavi, Aliey Ranjbar, Morteza Amestejani, M. Ghoddusi Johari, M. Shariat, Maral Mokhtari","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.7691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Invasive Papillary Carcinoma (IPC) of the breast is a rare breast cancer subtype. This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of IPC of the breast, its differences from Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC), and their survival outcomes.Materials and Methods: The medical records of 6599 patients were retrospectively reviewed at the Breast Disease Research Center from December 1993 to December 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: IPC and IDC. The tumor size, lymph node metastasis, pathologic stage, nuclear and histological grade, hormonal receptor status, and survival were reviewed and compared between the IPC and IDC groups.Results: Of the 6599 patients, 27 had IPC, and 6572 had IDC. The mean age of patients with IPC and IDC was 58.5 and 49 years, respectively (P=0.02). Patients with IPC were more likely to have a positive node status and had a significantly higher incidence of lymphovascular invasion (14.9% for IPCs and 53.3% for IDCs, P<0.001). ER status was positive in 66.6% of IPCs and 78.1% of IDCs (P=0.23). Additionally, 62.5% of patients with IPC and 94.9% of those with IDC received adjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.001). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were better in IPC patients for stage I (5-year DFS: 69% vs. 81%, P=0.008; 5-year OS: 75% vs. 85%, P=0.001).Conclusion: IPC is a rare tumor type that presents unique clinicopathological characteristics and is associated with a higher rate of breast-conserving surgery and a favorable prognosis than IDC","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.7691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Invasive Papillary Carcinoma (IPC) of the breast is a rare breast cancer subtype. This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of IPC of the breast, its differences from Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC), and their survival outcomes.Materials and Methods: The medical records of 6599 patients were retrospectively reviewed at the Breast Disease Research Center from December 1993 to December 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: IPC and IDC. The tumor size, lymph node metastasis, pathologic stage, nuclear and histological grade, hormonal receptor status, and survival were reviewed and compared between the IPC and IDC groups.Results: Of the 6599 patients, 27 had IPC, and 6572 had IDC. The mean age of patients with IPC and IDC was 58.5 and 49 years, respectively (P=0.02). Patients with IPC were more likely to have a positive node status and had a significantly higher incidence of lymphovascular invasion (14.9% for IPCs and 53.3% for IDCs, P<0.001). ER status was positive in 66.6% of IPCs and 78.1% of IDCs (P=0.23). Additionally, 62.5% of patients with IPC and 94.9% of those with IDC received adjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.001). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were better in IPC patients for stage I (5-year DFS: 69% vs. 81%, P=0.008; 5-year OS: 75% vs. 85%, P=0.001).Conclusion: IPC is a rare tumor type that presents unique clinicopathological characteristics and is associated with a higher rate of breast-conserving surgery and a favorable prognosis than IDC
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浸润性乳头状癌与浸润性导管癌的临床病理特征及其生存结果比较
背景:乳腺浸润性乳头状癌(IPC)是一种罕见的乳腺癌亚型。本研究旨在评估乳腺浸润性乳头状癌(IPC)的临床病理特征、与浸润性导管癌(IDC)的差异以及它们的生存结果:乳腺疾病研究中心回顾性审查了 1993 年 12 月至 2021 年 12 月期间 6599 名患者的病历。患者分为两组:IPC组和IDC组。对肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移情况、病理分期、核分级和组织学分级、激素受体状态以及IPC组和IDC组的生存情况进行回顾性分析和比较:结果:在 6599 名患者中,27 人患有 IPC,6572 人患有 IDC。IPC和IDC患者的平均年龄分别为58.5岁和49岁(P=0.02)。IPC患者的结节状态更有可能呈阳性,淋巴管侵犯的发生率也明显更高(IPC为14.9%,IDC为53.3%,P<0.001)。66.6%的IPC和78.1%的IDC的ER状态为阳性(P=0.23)。此外,62.5%的IPC患者和94.9%的IDC患者接受了辅助化疗(P<0.001)。IPC患者的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)均优于I期患者(5年DFS:69% vs. 81%,P=0.008;5年OS:75% vs. 85%,P=0.001):IPC是一种罕见的肿瘤类型,具有独特的临床病理特征,与IDC相比,IPC患者的保乳手术率更高,预后更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Non-metallic foreign bodies - diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Surgical removal of Aquafilling localized to different sites Experience in the use of endovenous methods and cell technologies in the treatment of trophic defects in patients with chronic venous insufficiency C6 Application of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in treatment of gastrointestinal lesions- single center experience. Sequential, ultrasound-guided, minimally invasive pit-picking procedure with Nd:YAGlaser epilation treatment for pilonidal disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1