Gender Difference in Explicit and Implicit Motor Imagery Ability in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

{"title":"Gender Difference in Explicit and Implicit Motor Imagery Ability in Multiple Sclerosis Patients","authors":"","doi":"10.32592/ircmj.2021.25.8.2012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gender differences, in favor of males, exist in motor skills and motor imagery (MI) ability in healthy people. The MI ability in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients was altered; however, the reduction rate in the two genders has not been compared. Knowing the gender difference in MI may be used in rehabilitation programs based on MI. Objectives: Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether gender difference in MI is evident in MS patients. Methods: Forty-nine relapse-remitting MS patients (23 men) and also 51 healthy subjects (21 men) participated in this case-control study. The MI ability can be measured by Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-20 (KVIQ-20), mental chronometry based on Box and Block test, and hand mental rotation task. Results: Healthy men performed most MI tasks better than healthy women. Unlike healthy participants, no gender differences were observed in the KVIQ-20 scale (P=0.904), mental chronometry duration (right hand, P=0.199; left hand, P=0.374) and reaction time of hand mental rotation (right-hand stimuli, P=0.057; left-hand stimuli, P=0.059). However, MS men responded to hand stimuli significantly more accurately than MS women (right-hand stimuli, P=0.007; left-hand stimuli, P=0.027). Conclusion: Our findings showed that MS men exhibit MI abilities similar to MS women. Perhaps motor deficit in MS males was influenced more by neurocognitive impairment. Perhaps in MS men as compared to MS women, MI practice as motor rehabilitation, could better improve their physical performance.","PeriodicalId":14628,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32592/ircmj.2021.25.8.2012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gender differences, in favor of males, exist in motor skills and motor imagery (MI) ability in healthy people. The MI ability in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients was altered; however, the reduction rate in the two genders has not been compared. Knowing the gender difference in MI may be used in rehabilitation programs based on MI. Objectives: Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether gender difference in MI is evident in MS patients. Methods: Forty-nine relapse-remitting MS patients (23 men) and also 51 healthy subjects (21 men) participated in this case-control study. The MI ability can be measured by Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-20 (KVIQ-20), mental chronometry based on Box and Block test, and hand mental rotation task. Results: Healthy men performed most MI tasks better than healthy women. Unlike healthy participants, no gender differences were observed in the KVIQ-20 scale (P=0.904), mental chronometry duration (right hand, P=0.199; left hand, P=0.374) and reaction time of hand mental rotation (right-hand stimuli, P=0.057; left-hand stimuli, P=0.059). However, MS men responded to hand stimuli significantly more accurately than MS women (right-hand stimuli, P=0.007; left-hand stimuli, P=0.027). Conclusion: Our findings showed that MS men exhibit MI abilities similar to MS women. Perhaps motor deficit in MS males was influenced more by neurocognitive impairment. Perhaps in MS men as compared to MS women, MI practice as motor rehabilitation, could better improve their physical performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症患者显性和隐性运动想象能力的性别差异
背景:健康人的运动技能和运动想象(MI)能力存在性别差异,男性更胜一筹。多发性硬化症(MS)患者的运动想象能力有所改变,但男女患者的降低率尚未进行比较。了解多发性硬化症患者在运动想象能力方面的性别差异可用于基于运动想象能力的康复计划。 研究目的因此,本研究旨在调查多发性硬化症患者在心肌缺血方面的性别差异是否明显。 研究方法49名复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者(23名男性)和51名健康受试者(21名男性)参与了这项病例对照研究。多发性硬化症患者的心肌缺血能力可通过运动学和视觉意象问卷-20(KVIQ-20)、基于盒和块测试的心智计时法以及手部心智旋转任务进行测量。 结果显示与健康女性相比,健康男性能更好地完成大多数心智整合任务。与健康参与者不同,在KVIQ-20量表(P=0.904)、心理计时持续时间(右手,P=0.199;左手,P=0.374)和手部心理旋转反应时间(右手刺激,P=0.057;左手刺激,P=0.059)方面未观察到性别差异。然而,男性多发性硬化症患者对手部刺激的反应明显比女性多发性硬化症患者更准确(右手刺激,P=0.007;左手刺激,P=0.027)。 结论:我们的研究结果表明,男性多发性硬化症患者的运动障碍能力与女性多发性硬化症患者相似。男性多发性硬化症患者的运动障碍可能更多地受到神经认知障碍的影响。与女性多发性硬化症患者相比,男性多发性硬化症患者的运动康复训练能更好地改善他们的身体表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal dealing with general Medicine and Surgery, Disaster Medicine and Health Policy. It is an official Journal of the Iranian Hospital Dubai and is published monthly. The Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal aims at publishing the high quality materials, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Medicine and Surgery
期刊最新文献
Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Alone in Ultrasound Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blockade for Femoral Fractures A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Ultrasound Detection of Thyroid Cancer in China Analysis of Differences in FIB, D-D, and Inflammatory Factor Levels between Patients Undergoing Pelvic Fracture Surgery through the Pararectus Abdominis Approach and Traditional Ilioinguinal Approach Management of Post-lumbar-operation Back Pain using Myofascial Trigger Point Injection: A Retrospective Study Perioperative Nursing Influence on Cerebrospinal Fluid Biochemical Markers in Cerebral Hemorrhage Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Intracranial Hematoma Removal Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1