Plástico versus vidrio: una visión del ciclo de vida de los dos materiales controvertidos

Sebastián Naranjo Silva
{"title":"Plástico versus vidrio: una visión del ciclo de vida de los dos materiales controvertidos","authors":"Sebastián Naranjo Silva","doi":"10.15332/iteckne.v20i2.3007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the last few years, the practices of reuse and repair products to extend their useful life and reduce waste generation gained interaction. As well as strongly promoting recycling, maximizing the materials industrialization to convert waste into new resources. Therefore, two controversial materials are currently discussed (Glass and Plastic). In 2020, 385 million tons of Plastic were produced globally, compared to 143 million tons of Glass. In 2020, the per capita consumption of Glass was 32 kg yearly, compared to Plastic at 105 kg yearly. However, the manuscript aims to discuss the use of Plastic versus Glass to learn about each material, its benefits, and disadvantages to make a perspective criticism. The methodology is investigative collecting from investigation articles statistics from 2017 to 2022. The results show that the choice between Glass or Plastic depends on very particular factors, such as the specific application in which it is required and the manufacturer's or end user's preferences. Moreover, it is important to highlight that, compared to Plastics, Glass has fewer negative impacts on climate change since it has a lower carbon footprint. However, a comprehensive approach is required to minimize the Glass effects on climate change due to its high energy consumption, including efficient production practices. It is recommended that each country define market statistics for the recovery, recycling, and industrialization of Glass, Plastic, and other items such as cardboard, paper, and aluminum cans to promote waste recovery and prevent surrounding pollution globally.","PeriodicalId":14530,"journal":{"name":"ITECKNE","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ITECKNE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15332/iteckne.v20i2.3007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the last few years, the practices of reuse and repair products to extend their useful life and reduce waste generation gained interaction. As well as strongly promoting recycling, maximizing the materials industrialization to convert waste into new resources. Therefore, two controversial materials are currently discussed (Glass and Plastic). In 2020, 385 million tons of Plastic were produced globally, compared to 143 million tons of Glass. In 2020, the per capita consumption of Glass was 32 kg yearly, compared to Plastic at 105 kg yearly. However, the manuscript aims to discuss the use of Plastic versus Glass to learn about each material, its benefits, and disadvantages to make a perspective criticism. The methodology is investigative collecting from investigation articles statistics from 2017 to 2022. The results show that the choice between Glass or Plastic depends on very particular factors, such as the specific application in which it is required and the manufacturer's or end user's preferences. Moreover, it is important to highlight that, compared to Plastics, Glass has fewer negative impacts on climate change since it has a lower carbon footprint. However, a comprehensive approach is required to minimize the Glass effects on climate change due to its high energy consumption, including efficient production practices. It is recommended that each country define market statistics for the recovery, recycling, and industrialization of Glass, Plastic, and other items such as cardboard, paper, and aluminum cans to promote waste recovery and prevent surrounding pollution globally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塑料与玻璃:两种有争议材料的生命周期分析
近几年来,通过再利用和维修来延长产品使用寿命、减少废物产生的做法得到了广泛的推广。同时,还大力提倡回收利用,最大限度地实现材料工业化,将废物转化为新资源。因此,目前讨论的是两种有争议的材料(玻璃和塑料)。2020 年,全球塑料产量为 3.85 亿吨,而玻璃产量为 1.43 亿吨。2020 年,玻璃的人均年消费量为 32 千克,而塑料的人均年消费量为 105 千克。然而,本手稿旨在讨论塑料与玻璃的使用情况,以了解每种材料、其优点和缺点,从而提出有远见的批评意见。研究方法是从 2017 年至 2022 年的调查文章统计数据中进行调查收集。结果表明,选择玻璃还是塑料取决于非常特殊的因素,如具体的应用要求以及制造商或最终用户的偏好。 此外,必须强调的是,与塑料相比,玻璃对气候变化的负面影响较小,因为它的碳足迹较低。然而,由于玻璃的能耗较高,因此需要采取综合方法,包括高效的生产实践,最大限度地减少玻璃对气候变化的影响。建议各国确定玻璃、塑料以及纸板、纸张和铝罐等其他物品的回收、循环利用和工业化的市场统计数据,以促进废物回收,在全球范围内防止周边污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimación de estado en la central termogas Machala utilizando machine learning Plástico versus vidrio: una visión del ciclo de vida de los dos materiales controvertidos Ceniza de cáscara de coco como susituto del cemento: efecto de la temperatura de calcinación Expansión de sistemas de transmisión eléctrica usando tablas de probabilidad de pérdida de capacidad en el modelo generación-transmisión Desempeño mecánico del concreto convencional reemplazando agregado grueso con polietileno de tereftalato
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1