Contemporaneity in Seventeenth-Century Chinese Painting, Theory, and Criticism

IF 1.1 0 ASIAN STUDIES Ming Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/0147037X.2023.2276599
Katharine Burnett
{"title":"Contemporaneity in Seventeenth-Century Chinese Painting, Theory, and Criticism","authors":"Katharine Burnett","doi":"10.1080/0147037X.2023.2276599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chinese painting has often been considered timeless and unchanging, an art reliant on the copying of the ancients, and thereby forever reiterative. Closer inspection of the art, theory, and criticism, especially of the seventeenth century, however, challenges these notions. When time and again we see artists referring to the works of earlier acclaimed painters but yet transforming them — or even subverting them — we must ask what values are being promoted. In this essay, it is argued that a shift occurred in painting criticism and practice from the sixteenth century to the seventeenth, that seventeenth-century critical values emphasized the contemporary, new, and different, and that this resulted in an expanded canon of painting.","PeriodicalId":41737,"journal":{"name":"Ming Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"3 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ming Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0147037X.2023.2276599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chinese painting has often been considered timeless and unchanging, an art reliant on the copying of the ancients, and thereby forever reiterative. Closer inspection of the art, theory, and criticism, especially of the seventeenth century, however, challenges these notions. When time and again we see artists referring to the works of earlier acclaimed painters but yet transforming them — or even subverting them — we must ask what values are being promoted. In this essay, it is argued that a shift occurred in painting criticism and practice from the sixteenth century to the seventeenth, that seventeenth-century critical values emphasized the contemporary, new, and different, and that this resulted in an expanded canon of painting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十七世纪中国绘画、理论和批评中的当代性
中国绘画常常被认为是永恒不变的,是一门依赖于临摹古人的艺术,因而永远是重复的。然而,仔细观察艺术、理论和评论,尤其是十七世纪的艺术、理论和评论,就会对这些观念提出质疑。当我们一次又一次地看到艺术家们借鉴早期著名画家的作品,却又对其进行改造,甚至是颠覆时,我们必须要问,他们所倡导的是什么价值观。本文认为,从十六世纪到十七世纪,绘画批评和实践发生了转变,十七世纪的批评价值观强调当代性、新颖性和差异性,这导致了绘画经典的扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ming Studies
Ming Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Self-cultivation according to Li Zhi and its Paradoxes The Price of Collapse: The Little Ice Age and the Fall of Ming China Support-Seeking and Active Coping Mitigate the Association Between Posttrauma Symptom Severity and Attachment Insecurity in a Community Sample of Trauma Survivors. Ming News He Liangjun 何良俊 (1506–1573), On Painting : An Annotated Translation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1