The Italian Neo-Idealists and Federigo Enriques

Q1 Arts and Humanities Substantia Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.36253/substantia-2177
Luca Nicotra
{"title":"The Italian Neo-Idealists and Federigo Enriques","authors":"Luca Nicotra","doi":"10.36253/substantia-2177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The controversy that between 1908 and 1912 saw Benedetto Croce and Giovanni Gentile opposed on one side and Federigo Enriques on the other did not actually have a conclusive episode, but its end was perceived, for its results on culture, on society and teaching in Italy, as a \"defeat\" of Enriques. A more careful examination of the events and of the historical context in which it took place seems, however, to clearly demonstrate that we can speak not of a personal defeat of the great mathematician from Livorno, but rather of a defeat of the commendable attempts at cultural and social modernization of Italy in an international perspective, of which Enriques was not the only actor but certainly the most exposed. Such intentions were crushed by the myopic provincial conservatism of Italian neo-idealism, favored by the fascist regime, concerned only with affirming in the world an alleged autarkic national cultural superiority, based on the traditional literary-humanistic culture, ignoring the progress of the new technical-scientific thought, due to its nature instead placed in an international context.","PeriodicalId":32750,"journal":{"name":"Substantia","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substantia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/substantia-2177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The controversy that between 1908 and 1912 saw Benedetto Croce and Giovanni Gentile opposed on one side and Federigo Enriques on the other did not actually have a conclusive episode, but its end was perceived, for its results on culture, on society and teaching in Italy, as a "defeat" of Enriques. A more careful examination of the events and of the historical context in which it took place seems, however, to clearly demonstrate that we can speak not of a personal defeat of the great mathematician from Livorno, but rather of a defeat of the commendable attempts at cultural and social modernization of Italy in an international perspective, of which Enriques was not the only actor but certainly the most exposed. Such intentions were crushed by the myopic provincial conservatism of Italian neo-idealism, favored by the fascist regime, concerned only with affirming in the world an alleged autarkic national cultural superiority, based on the traditional literary-humanistic culture, ignoring the progress of the new technical-scientific thought, due to its nature instead placed in an international context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利新理想主义者和费德里戈-恩里克斯
1908 至 1912 年间,以贝内代托-克罗齐(Benedetto Croce)和乔瓦尼-詹蒂莱(Giovanni Gentile)为一方,以费德里戈-恩里克斯(Federigo Enriques)为另一方的争论实际上并无定论,但由于其对意大利文化、社会和教学的影响,争论的结束被视为恩里克斯的 "失败"。然而,对事件及其发生的历史背景进行更仔细的研究似乎可以清楚地表明,我们可以说的不是这位来自利沃诺的伟大数学家个人的失败,而是在国际视野下意大利文化和社会现代化的值得称道的尝试的失败,恩里克并不是唯一的参与者,但肯定是最引人注目的。在法西斯政权的支持下,这种意图被意大利新理想主义的近视保守主义所粉碎,新理想主义只关心在传统的文学人文文化的基础上,在世界上肯定所谓的自成体系的民族文化优越性,而忽视了新的技术科学思想的进步,由于其性质,这种思想被置于国际背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Substantia
Substantia Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence vs. Natural Stupidity Professors Trost and Sheldon’s Promotion of Catalytic Technologies, Atom Economy, and the E-Factor Metrics in Synthetic Organic Chemistry and the Fine Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industries, to Speed the Early Evolution of “Green Chemistry” The Mixed Blessings of Pragmatism. Jean-Baptiste Dumas and the (Al)chemical Quest for Metallic Transmutation Martin Heinrich Klaproth (1743-1817), a Great, Somewhat Forgotten, Chemist The Italian Neo-Idealists and Federigo Enriques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1