Comparing the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery: A systematic review

Amit Patil, A. Patel, B. Pande
{"title":"Comparing the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery: A systematic review","authors":"Amit Patil, A. Patel, B. Pande","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_130_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the surgical treatment, local anesthetic wound infiltration (WI) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are both utilized to relieve pain after abdominal surgery. To identify the most effective analgesic method, we conducted this systematic review. We extensively examined the literature for studies contrasting TAP block with WI after abdominal surgery. We performed the systematic review using online datasets such as Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Scopus. There was a set of exclusion and inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials that studied comparison between TAP and local anesthetic WI. At 2 postoperative hours, there was a significant difference in the pain intensity during rest between WI and TAP block. TAP block significantly reduced pain scores compared to WI throughout rest and movements at 12 and 24 h. Patients who had a TAP block had considerably lower postoperative morphine use and postoperative nausea and vomiting occurrence. In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, there are moderate-to-high-level indications that the TAP block offers superior analgesia versus WI.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_130_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the surgical treatment, local anesthetic wound infiltration (WI) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are both utilized to relieve pain after abdominal surgery. To identify the most effective analgesic method, we conducted this systematic review. We extensively examined the literature for studies contrasting TAP block with WI after abdominal surgery. We performed the systematic review using online datasets such as Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Scopus. There was a set of exclusion and inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials that studied comparison between TAP and local anesthetic WI. At 2 postoperative hours, there was a significant difference in the pain intensity during rest between WI and TAP block. TAP block significantly reduced pain scores compared to WI throughout rest and movements at 12 and 24 h. Patients who had a TAP block had considerably lower postoperative morphine use and postoperative nausea and vomiting occurrence. In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, there are moderate-to-high-level indications that the TAP block offers superior analgesia versus WI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较腹横肌平面阻滞与伤口浸润对腹部手术术后疼痛治疗的镇痛效果:系统性综述
在手术治疗过程中,局部麻醉伤口浸润(WI)和腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞都可用于缓解腹部手术后的疼痛。为了确定最有效的镇痛方法,我们进行了此次系统性回顾。我们广泛查阅了腹部手术后 TAP 阻滞与 WI 的对比研究文献。我们利用在线数据集(如 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、PubMed 和 Scopus)进行了系统性回顾。我们制定了一套排除和纳入标准,包括研究 TAP 与局麻药 WI 比较的随机对照试验。术后 2 小时,WI 和 TAP 阻滞在休息时的疼痛强度有显著差异。在术后 12 小时和 24 小时,TAP 阻滞与 WI 相比,能明显降低患者在休息和运动时的疼痛评分。在腹部手术患者中,有中度至高度迹象表明 TAP 阻滞的镇痛效果优于 WI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Selective Critically ill patients with tracheostomy are eligible for direct from intensive care unit sent home: Case series Comment on: Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and monocyte lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study Low procalcitonin clearance correlates with mortality treated with culture-matched antibiotics in intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational study Phenylephrine, ondansetron, or combination of both for prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section: A prospective, double-blind randomized control trial Artificial intelligence in anesthesia and critical care (part 1): Current perspective in critical care setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1