Nuclear mass predictions with the naive Bayesian model averaging method

IF 1.7 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, NUCLEAR Nuclear Physics A Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122820
X.Y. Zhang (张晓燕) , W.F. Li (李伟峰) , J.Y. Fang (方基宇) , Z.M. Niu (牛中明)
{"title":"Nuclear mass predictions with the naive Bayesian model averaging method","authors":"X.Y. Zhang (张晓燕) ,&nbsp;W.F. Li (李伟峰) ,&nbsp;J.Y. Fang (方基宇) ,&nbsp;Z.M. Niu (牛中明)","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A naive Bayesian model averaging (NBMA) method is developed to predict nuclear masses. In the NBMA method, the weights of different models may be different for each nucleus, which are sensitive to the model accuracies to describe the nuclear masses of the isotopes and isotones with the same proton and neutron numbers of that nucleus. Therefore, there are remarkable local structures for the weights of different models on the nuclear chart, which well eliminates the local deviations between the model predictions and the experimental masses and thus achieves better accuracy of mass predictions than the traditional arithmetic mean method (AMM) and weighted average method (WAM). Based on the latest atomic mass evaluation of AME2020, the root-mean-square (rms) mass deviation of the NBMA method is 0.293 MeV, while the rms deviations of AMM and WAM are 0.634 and 0.361 MeV, respectively. This accuracy of the NBMA method is even 28% better than the best accuracy of the mass models used in the NBMA method. The extrapolation ability of the NBMA method is also verified with the experimental nuclear masses which are not used in the training of the NBMA method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19246,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Physics A","volume":"1043 ","pages":"Article 122820"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Physics A","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947424000022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A naive Bayesian model averaging (NBMA) method is developed to predict nuclear masses. In the NBMA method, the weights of different models may be different for each nucleus, which are sensitive to the model accuracies to describe the nuclear masses of the isotopes and isotones with the same proton and neutron numbers of that nucleus. Therefore, there are remarkable local structures for the weights of different models on the nuclear chart, which well eliminates the local deviations between the model predictions and the experimental masses and thus achieves better accuracy of mass predictions than the traditional arithmetic mean method (AMM) and weighted average method (WAM). Based on the latest atomic mass evaluation of AME2020, the root-mean-square (rms) mass deviation of the NBMA method is 0.293 MeV, while the rms deviations of AMM and WAM are 0.634 and 0.361 MeV, respectively. This accuracy of the NBMA method is even 28% better than the best accuracy of the mass models used in the NBMA method. The extrapolation ability of the NBMA method is also verified with the experimental nuclear masses which are not used in the training of the NBMA method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用天真的贝叶斯模型平均法预测核质量
本文提出了一种预测核质量的天真贝叶斯模型平均法(NBMA)。在天真贝叶斯模型平均法中,每个原子核的不同模型的权重可能是不同的,这对模型描述该原子核具有相同质子数和中子数的同位素和同素异形体的核质量的准确性非常敏感。因此,不同模型在核图上的权重存在显著的局部结构,很好地消除了模型预测与实验质量之间的局部偏差,从而比传统的算术平均法(AMM)和加权平均法(WAM)获得了更好的质量预测精度。根据 AME2020 最新的原子质量评估,NBMA 方法的均方根质量偏差为 0.293 MeV,而 AMM 和 WAM 的均方根偏差分别为 0.634 和 0.361 MeV。NBMA 方法的这一精度甚至比 NBMA 方法所用质量模型的最佳精度还要高出 28%。NBMA 方法的外推能力还通过实验核质量得到了验证,实验核质量并没有用于 NBMA 方法的训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Physics A
Nuclear Physics A 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
113
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Nuclear Physics A focuses on the domain of nuclear and hadronic physics and includes the following subsections: Nuclear Structure and Dynamics; Intermediate and High Energy Heavy Ion Physics; Hadronic Physics; Electromagnetic and Weak Interactions; Nuclear Astrophysics. The emphasis is on original research papers. A number of carefully selected and reviewed conference proceedings are published as an integral part of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Probing multi-particle bunching from intermittency analysis in relativistic heavy-ion collisions Investigation of the proton radius of the Borromean halo nucleus 19B Re-visiting the role of short-range correlations on neutron-star properties Elucidating shell/subshell closure and the critical impact of isospin-asymmetry on barium isotopes using relativistic mean-field approach A new measurement of 174Hf alpha decay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1