The Boundaries of Existence: Mendelssohn's Proof in Light of Wolff and Boscovich

IF 0.7 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1353/hph.2024.a916712
Matteo Favaretti Camposampiero
{"title":"The Boundaries of Existence: Mendelssohn's Proof in Light of Wolff and Boscovich","authors":"Matteo Favaretti Camposampiero","doi":"10.1353/hph.2024.a916712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>abstract:</p><p>By revisiting the <i>Phädon</i>'s proof of the indestructibility of the soul, this paper casts light on the sources that lie in the background of Mendelssohn's dialogue. After discussing Wolff's use of the Law of Continuity against the possibility of natural annihilation as a precedent for Mendelssohn's argument, I show that the latter is also heavily indebted to Boscovich's argument against the possibility of contiguity in the continuum. I contend that Mendelssohn's appropriation of Boscovich's argument is influenced by Wolff's treatment of the hypothesis of the soul's transformation. I conclude with some remarks on Kant's refutation of the <i>Phädon</i>'s proof in light of his possible acquaintance with Boscovich's natural philosophy.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":46448,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2024.a916712","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:

By revisiting the Phädon's proof of the indestructibility of the soul, this paper casts light on the sources that lie in the background of Mendelssohn's dialogue. After discussing Wolff's use of the Law of Continuity against the possibility of natural annihilation as a precedent for Mendelssohn's argument, I show that the latter is also heavily indebted to Boscovich's argument against the possibility of contiguity in the continuum. I contend that Mendelssohn's appropriation of Boscovich's argument is influenced by Wolff's treatment of the hypothesis of the soul's transformation. I conclude with some remarks on Kant's refutation of the Phädon's proof in light of his possible acquaintance with Boscovich's natural philosophy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
存在的边界:从沃尔夫和博斯科维奇看门德尔松的证明
摘要:本文通过重温法顿对灵魂不灭的证明,揭示了门德尔松对话的背景来源。在讨论了沃尔夫利用 "连续性法则 "反对自然毁灭的可能性作为门德尔松论证的先例之后,我指出后者在很大程度上也借鉴了博斯科维奇反对连续性中毗连可能性的论证。我认为,门德尔松对博斯科维奇论证的引用受到了沃尔夫对灵魂转化假说的影响。最后,我将从康德可能了解博斯科维奇的自然哲学的角度,对康德驳斥费顿证明的观点发表一些看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Since January 2002, the Journal of the History of Philosophy has been published by The Johns Hopkins University Press. For subscriptions, change of address, and back issues, please contact Subscription Services. In addition to photocopying allowed by the "fair use" doctrine, JHP authorizes personal or educational multiple-copying by instructors for use within a course. This policy does not cover photocopying for commercial use either by individuals or publishers. All such uses must be authorized by JHP.
期刊最新文献
Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos: The Philosophical Arguments by Simon Truwant (review) “The Season of Exaggerated Hopes”: Richard T. Greener in the Reconstruction University Constance Naden’s Metaphysics: Hylo-Idealism’s Ideal Known World and Unknown Matter Philosophy and the Language of the People: The Claims of Common Speech from Petrarch to Locke by Lodi Nauta (review) Materialism from Hobbes to Locke by Stewart Duncan (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1