{"title":"k-Class instrumental variables quantile regression","authors":"David M. Kaplan, Xin Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00181-023-02543-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With mean instrumental variables regression, <i>k</i>-class estimators have the potential to reduce bias, which is larger with weak instruments. With instrumental variables quantile regression, weak instrument-robust estimation is even more important because there is less guidance for assessing instrument strength. Motivated by this, we introduce an analogous <i>k</i>-class of estimators for instrumental variables quantile regression. We show the first-order asymptotic distribution under strong instruments is equivalent for all conventional choices of <i>k</i>. We evaluate finite-sample median bias in simulations for a variety of <i>k</i>, including the <i>k</i> for the conventional <i>k</i>-class estimator corresponding to limited information maximum likelihood (LIML). Computation is fast for all <i>k</i>, and compared to the <span>\\(k=1\\)</span> benchmark estimator (analogous to 2SLS), using the LIML <i>k</i> reliably reduces median bias in a variety of data-generating processes, especially when the degree of overidentification is larger. We also revisit some empirical estimates of consumption Euler equations derived from quantile utility maximization. All code is provided online (https://kaplandm.github.io).\n</p>","PeriodicalId":11642,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Economics","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02543-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With mean instrumental variables regression, k-class estimators have the potential to reduce bias, which is larger with weak instruments. With instrumental variables quantile regression, weak instrument-robust estimation is even more important because there is less guidance for assessing instrument strength. Motivated by this, we introduce an analogous k-class of estimators for instrumental variables quantile regression. We show the first-order asymptotic distribution under strong instruments is equivalent for all conventional choices of k. We evaluate finite-sample median bias in simulations for a variety of k, including the k for the conventional k-class estimator corresponding to limited information maximum likelihood (LIML). Computation is fast for all k, and compared to the \(k=1\) benchmark estimator (analogous to 2SLS), using the LIML k reliably reduces median bias in a variety of data-generating processes, especially when the degree of overidentification is larger. We also revisit some empirical estimates of consumption Euler equations derived from quantile utility maximization. All code is provided online (https://kaplandm.github.io).
对于均值工具变量回归,k 级估计器有可能减少偏差,而在工具较弱的情况下,偏差会更大。对于工具变量量化回归,弱工具稳健估计更为重要,因为评估工具强度的指导较少。受此启发,我们为工具变量量化回归引入了类似的 k 类估计器。我们在模拟中评估了各种 k 的有限样本中位偏差,包括与有限信息最大似然法(LIML)相对应的传统 k 类估计器的 k。所有 k 的计算速度都很快,与基准估计器(类似于 2SLS)相比,使用 LIML k 可以可靠地减少各种数据生成过程中的中位偏差,尤其是当过度识别程度较大时。我们还重新审视了从量子效用最大化推导出的消费欧拉方程的一些经验估计值。所有代码均在线提供(https://kaplandm.github.io)。
期刊介绍:
Empirical Economics publishes high quality papers using econometric or statistical methods to fill the gap between economic theory and observed data. Papers explore such topics as estimation of established relationships between economic variables, testing of hypotheses derived from economic theory, treatment effect estimation, policy evaluation, simulation, forecasting, as well as econometric methods and measurement. Empirical Economics emphasizes the replicability of empirical results. Replication studies of important results in the literature - both positive and negative results - may be published as short papers in Empirical Economics. Authors of all accepted papers and replications are required to submit all data and codes prior to publication (for more details, see: Instructions for Authors).The journal follows a single blind review procedure. In order to ensure the high quality of the journal and an efficient editorial process, a substantial number of submissions that have very poor chances of receiving positive reviews are routinely rejected without sending the papers for review.Officially cited as: Empir Econ