{"title":"Stochastic instability: a dynamic quantile approach","authors":"Jean-Paul Chavas","doi":"10.1007/s00181-024-02651-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the nature of instability in stochastic dynamical systems. Relying on a quantile approach, we propose to measure dynamic instability by the average rate of divergence (<span>\\(AR{D}^{\\text{s}}\\)</span>) of the state along a finite forward stochastic path. Under stochastic shocks, <span>\\(AR{D}^{\\text{s}}\\)</span> is a random variable with a given distribution function that depends on the nature of the underlying dynamic process as well as the nature of the shocks. We show how our approach can be made empirically tractable using a quantile autoregression (QAR) model. In an empirical application to futures price, the QAR estimates provide statistical evidence that futures price instability varies with market conditions: instability increases with the maturity of the futures contract as well as with higher quantiles (representing positive shocks located in the upper tail of the price distribution). We find that neglecting stochastic shocks (e.g., under a deterministic dynamic analysis) tends to overstate the presence of instability. The results stress the importance of evaluating the dynamic impacts of shocks across the whole distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":11642,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Economics","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02651-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines the nature of instability in stochastic dynamical systems. Relying on a quantile approach, we propose to measure dynamic instability by the average rate of divergence (\(AR{D}^{\text{s}}\)) of the state along a finite forward stochastic path. Under stochastic shocks, \(AR{D}^{\text{s}}\) is a random variable with a given distribution function that depends on the nature of the underlying dynamic process as well as the nature of the shocks. We show how our approach can be made empirically tractable using a quantile autoregression (QAR) model. In an empirical application to futures price, the QAR estimates provide statistical evidence that futures price instability varies with market conditions: instability increases with the maturity of the futures contract as well as with higher quantiles (representing positive shocks located in the upper tail of the price distribution). We find that neglecting stochastic shocks (e.g., under a deterministic dynamic analysis) tends to overstate the presence of instability. The results stress the importance of evaluating the dynamic impacts of shocks across the whole distribution.
期刊介绍:
Empirical Economics publishes high quality papers using econometric or statistical methods to fill the gap between economic theory and observed data. Papers explore such topics as estimation of established relationships between economic variables, testing of hypotheses derived from economic theory, treatment effect estimation, policy evaluation, simulation, forecasting, as well as econometric methods and measurement. Empirical Economics emphasizes the replicability of empirical results. Replication studies of important results in the literature - both positive and negative results - may be published as short papers in Empirical Economics. Authors of all accepted papers and replications are required to submit all data and codes prior to publication (for more details, see: Instructions for Authors).The journal follows a single blind review procedure. In order to ensure the high quality of the journal and an efficient editorial process, a substantial number of submissions that have very poor chances of receiving positive reviews are routinely rejected without sending the papers for review.Officially cited as: Empir Econ