Acupuncture for Parkinson's disease-related constipation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE European Journal of Integrative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102332
Xin-Xin Feng , Lei Chen , Yong-Yi Xu , Kai Zhou , Kai-Yu Huang
{"title":"Acupuncture for Parkinson's disease-related constipation: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Xin-Xin Feng ,&nbsp;Lei Chen ,&nbsp;Yong-Yi Xu ,&nbsp;Kai Zhou ,&nbsp;Kai-Yu Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The hazard of Parkinson's disease-related constipation (PDC) cannot be ignored. Acupuncture has the potential to become a mainstream treatment option for PDC. This review aimed to investigate the effect of acupuncture on PDC, which might provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical application.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about acupuncture for PDC. The primary outcome was response rate. The secondary outcomes were rectal resting pressure, anal resting pressure, anal maximum contraction pressure, rectal sensation threshold, rectal maximum tolerable volume, the Constipation Scoring System (CSS) score, the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score, and adverse events (AEs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight trials involving 591 participants were included. The methodological quality was generally low. A significant difference was found in response rate when comparing acupuncture with medicine (95 %CI= 1.09 to 1.54, <em>P</em> = 0.003) or blank control (95 %CI= 1.04 to 1.74, <em>P</em> = 0.02), while no significant difference was observed when comparing acupuncture + medicine with medicine. Acupuncture + medicine did have a significant effect on rectal resting pressure, anal resting pressure, anal maximum contraction pressure, rectal sensation threshold and rectal maximum tolerable volume when compared with medicine, while no significant effect was found when acupuncture was compared with medicine. A significant difference was found in the CSS score when acupuncture was compared with blank and in the PAC-QOL score when acupuncture was compared with sham or blank, while no significant difference was found in the PAC-QOL score when acupuncture was compared with medicine. One study reported mild AEs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Acupuncture might be an effective treatment for PDC. Due to the limited quality of evidence, high-caliber and multi-center RCTs with large sample sizes should be carried out.</p><p>(PROSPERO ID is CRD42023422102)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The hazard of Parkinson's disease-related constipation (PDC) cannot be ignored. Acupuncture has the potential to become a mainstream treatment option for PDC. This review aimed to investigate the effect of acupuncture on PDC, which might provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical application.

Methods

Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about acupuncture for PDC. The primary outcome was response rate. The secondary outcomes were rectal resting pressure, anal resting pressure, anal maximum contraction pressure, rectal sensation threshold, rectal maximum tolerable volume, the Constipation Scoring System (CSS) score, the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score, and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Eight trials involving 591 participants were included. The methodological quality was generally low. A significant difference was found in response rate when comparing acupuncture with medicine (95 %CI= 1.09 to 1.54, P = 0.003) or blank control (95 %CI= 1.04 to 1.74, P = 0.02), while no significant difference was observed when comparing acupuncture + medicine with medicine. Acupuncture + medicine did have a significant effect on rectal resting pressure, anal resting pressure, anal maximum contraction pressure, rectal sensation threshold and rectal maximum tolerable volume when compared with medicine, while no significant effect was found when acupuncture was compared with medicine. A significant difference was found in the CSS score when acupuncture was compared with blank and in the PAC-QOL score when acupuncture was compared with sham or blank, while no significant difference was found in the PAC-QOL score when acupuncture was compared with medicine. One study reported mild AEs.

Conclusions

Acupuncture might be an effective treatment for PDC. Due to the limited quality of evidence, high-caliber and multi-center RCTs with large sample sizes should be carried out.

(PROSPERO ID is CRD42023422102)

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针灸治疗帕金森病相关性便秘:系统回顾和荟萃分析
简介:帕金森病相关性便秘(PDC)的危害不容忽视。针灸有望成为治疗帕金森病的主流方法。本综述旨在研究针灸对 PDC 的影响,从而为临床应用提供循证建议。方法检索了六个数据库中有关针灸治疗 PDC 的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果为应答率。次要结果为直肠静止压、肛门静止压、肛门最大收缩压、直肠感觉阈值、直肠最大耐受量、便秘评分系统(CSS)评分、便秘患者生活质量评估(PAC-QOL)评分以及不良事件(AEs)。方法学质量普遍较低。针灸与药物(95%CI= 1.09 至 1.54,P=0.003)或空白对照(95%CI= 1.04 至 1.74,P=0.02)相比,反应率有明显差异,而针灸+药物与药物相比则无明显差异。与药物相比,针灸+药物对直肠静息压、肛门静息压、肛门最大收缩压、直肠感觉阈值和直肠最大耐受量有显著影响,而针灸与药物相比则无显著影响。针灸与空白对照时,CSS 评分有明显差异;针灸与假药或空白对照时,PAC-QOL 评分有明显差异,而针灸与药物对照时,PAC-QOL 评分无明显差异。结论针灸可能是治疗 PDC 的有效方法。由于证据质量有限,应进行高水平、多中心、大样本量的 RCT 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of clinical control and symptom severity on attitudes towards holistic complementary alternative medicine in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study Evolving research methodologies are shaping the future of integrative medicine Hotspots and trends in global antiviral herbal basic research: A visualization analysis Effectiveness and safety of Qianjinweijing decoction in the treatment of bronchiectasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Reflexology specific guidance for using the template for the intervention description and replication (TIDieR): A delphi study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1