Aristotle on How Animals Move: The De incessu animalium. Text, Translation, and Interpretative Essays ed. by Andrea Falcon and Stasinos Stavrianeas (review)

IF 0.7 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1353/hph.2024.a916716
Pavel Gregorić
{"title":"Aristotle on How Animals Move: The De incessu animalium. Text, Translation, and Interpretative Essays ed. by Andrea Falcon and Stasinos Stavrianeas (review)","authors":"Pavel Gregorić","doi":"10.1353/hph.2024.a916716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Aristotle on How Animals Move: The</em> De incessu animalium. <em>Text, Translation, and Interpretative Essays</em> ed. by Andrea Falcon and Stasinos Stavrianeas <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Pavel Gregorić </li> </ul> Andrea Falcon and Stasinos Stavrianeas, editors. <em>Aristotle on How Animals Move: The De incessu animalium. Text, Translation, and Interpretative Essays</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. xv + 315. Hardback, $120.00. <p>Aristotle was deeply fascinated by animals on account of their self-motion—that is, animals move themselves from one place to another in response to their needs and desires rather than in mechanical or chemical reaction to things in their environment, as inanimate things and plants do. This ability requires sensory awareness of one's environment and sophisticated control of one's body. Moreover, Aristotle was intrigued by the sheer variety of ways animals move themselves and of the parts they employ to do so. Indeed, this variety was something Aristotle systematically observed and held in need of scientific explanation, which is precisely what he delivers in the short treatise, <em>On Progression of Animals</em> (<em>De incessu animalium</em>, henceforth <em>IA</em>).</p> <p>To explain the variety of animal locomotion and their locomotory parts, Aristotle relied on three very general principles: first, nature does nothing in vain; second, there are six functionally determined spatial directions; and third, pushing and pulling are the most basic mechanical actions of locomotion. He also developed a relevant taxonomy (two-footed/four-footed/many-footed/footless) and devised a highly abstract notion of the bodily architecture of animals (single origin of motion in the middle of the body; a certain number of peripheral \"points of motion\"; bending as the fundamental operation of limbs). Aristotle's enterprise is likely to strike us as alien because it is entirely disconnected from Linnaean taxonomy and evolutionary theory, as well as from the essentials of biomechanics. However, we cannot fail to be impressed by his achievement in terms of generality, systematicity, and explanatory power—all this in the absence of anyone's shoulders to stand on.</p> <p>Although <em>IA</em> provides an excellent glimpse into Aristotle's scientific methodology, from antiquity to the present day it has been one of his least studied works. This volume—the first book-length study of <em>IA</em> in any modern language—takes a first step toward correcting this unfortunate situation. It is, quite simply, the only companion to <em>IA</em> that we have, and it is likely to remain the best one for many years to come. This volume contains a critical edition of the Greek text, an accompanying English translation, and a commentary in the form of nine sections that discuss one or several chapters of Aristotle's text in their sequence. There is also some introductory material, a bibliography, a general index, and an index of the passages referred to.</p> <p>The Greek text, prepared by Pantelis Golitsis, marks a significant improvement on Jaeger's 1913 text. Golitsis inspected the five most important manuscripts and helpfully distinguished three different hands in the oldest manuscript Z (Oxford, Corpus Christi, ms. 108). He also took into account three new witnesses, although, sadly, he left out the Latin tradition. He produced a Greek text that departs from Jaeger at some forty places and sensibly diverges from the traditional division of chapters 17 and 18. He equipped the text with a rich and positive critical apparatus. The translation—the joint work of the authors of the commentary, polished by Andrea Falcon—is for the most part accurate, reads smoothly, and is terminologically consistent, surpassing the two most widely used English translations: Farquharson's in the Revised Oxford Translation of Aristotle's works, and Forster's in the Loeb series. At least one inaccuracy should be noted, however: at 704b14, the Greek has τοῦτον, whereas the translation reads τὸν αὐτόν, following Leonicus's <em>eodem modo</em> (45). Falcon makes much of the reading \"things occur in <em>the same</em> manner in all works of nature\" in his chapter on <em>IA</em> 1–3 (109–12, emphasis added), without noting that it departs from the printed Greek text.</p> <p>The introductory material has three parts. The first is Andrea Falcon's helpful general introduction to Aristotle's text. Falcon presents the agenda of <em>IA</em>, with eleven questions Aristotle sets out to answer and the main elements...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46448,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2024.a916716","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Aristotle on How Animals Move: The De incessu animalium. Text, Translation, and Interpretative Essays ed. by Andrea Falcon and Stasinos Stavrianeas
  • Pavel Gregorić
Andrea Falcon and Stasinos Stavrianeas, editors. Aristotle on How Animals Move: The De incessu animalium. Text, Translation, and Interpretative Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. xv + 315. Hardback, $120.00.

Aristotle was deeply fascinated by animals on account of their self-motion—that is, animals move themselves from one place to another in response to their needs and desires rather than in mechanical or chemical reaction to things in their environment, as inanimate things and plants do. This ability requires sensory awareness of one's environment and sophisticated control of one's body. Moreover, Aristotle was intrigued by the sheer variety of ways animals move themselves and of the parts they employ to do so. Indeed, this variety was something Aristotle systematically observed and held in need of scientific explanation, which is precisely what he delivers in the short treatise, On Progression of Animals (De incessu animalium, henceforth IA).

To explain the variety of animal locomotion and their locomotory parts, Aristotle relied on three very general principles: first, nature does nothing in vain; second, there are six functionally determined spatial directions; and third, pushing and pulling are the most basic mechanical actions of locomotion. He also developed a relevant taxonomy (two-footed/four-footed/many-footed/footless) and devised a highly abstract notion of the bodily architecture of animals (single origin of motion in the middle of the body; a certain number of peripheral "points of motion"; bending as the fundamental operation of limbs). Aristotle's enterprise is likely to strike us as alien because it is entirely disconnected from Linnaean taxonomy and evolutionary theory, as well as from the essentials of biomechanics. However, we cannot fail to be impressed by his achievement in terms of generality, systematicity, and explanatory power—all this in the absence of anyone's shoulders to stand on.

Although IA provides an excellent glimpse into Aristotle's scientific methodology, from antiquity to the present day it has been one of his least studied works. This volume—the first book-length study of IA in any modern language—takes a first step toward correcting this unfortunate situation. It is, quite simply, the only companion to IA that we have, and it is likely to remain the best one for many years to come. This volume contains a critical edition of the Greek text, an accompanying English translation, and a commentary in the form of nine sections that discuss one or several chapters of Aristotle's text in their sequence. There is also some introductory material, a bibliography, a general index, and an index of the passages referred to.

The Greek text, prepared by Pantelis Golitsis, marks a significant improvement on Jaeger's 1913 text. Golitsis inspected the five most important manuscripts and helpfully distinguished three different hands in the oldest manuscript Z (Oxford, Corpus Christi, ms. 108). He also took into account three new witnesses, although, sadly, he left out the Latin tradition. He produced a Greek text that departs from Jaeger at some forty places and sensibly diverges from the traditional division of chapters 17 and 18. He equipped the text with a rich and positive critical apparatus. The translation—the joint work of the authors of the commentary, polished by Andrea Falcon—is for the most part accurate, reads smoothly, and is terminologically consistent, surpassing the two most widely used English translations: Farquharson's in the Revised Oxford Translation of Aristotle's works, and Forster's in the Loeb series. At least one inaccuracy should be noted, however: at 704b14, the Greek has τοῦτον, whereas the translation reads τὸν αὐτόν, following Leonicus's eodem modo (45). Falcon makes much of the reading "things occur in the same manner in all works of nature" in his chapter on IA 1–3 (109–12, emphasis added), without noting that it departs from the printed Greek text.

The introductory material has three parts. The first is Andrea Falcon's helpful general introduction to Aristotle's text. Falcon presents the agenda of IA, with eleven questions Aristotle sets out to answer and the main elements...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚里士多德论动物的运动方式:De incessu animalium。Andrea Falcon 和 Stasinos Stavrianeas 编著的《文本、翻译和释义论文》(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 亚里士多德论动物的运动方式:De incessu animalium。Andrea Falcon 和 Stasinos Stavrianeas 编辑的文本、翻译和释义论文 Pavel Gregorić Andrea Falcon 和 Stasinos Stavrianeas 编辑。亚里士多德论动物的运动方式:De incessu animalium。文本、翻译和释义论文。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2021 年。第 xv + 315 页。精装,120.00 美元。亚里士多德对动物深深着迷,因为它们具有自我运动的能力--也就是说,动物根据自己的需要和欲望将自己从一个地方移动到另一个地方,而不是像无生命的东西和植物那样,对环境中的事物做出机械或化学反应。这种能力需要对环境的感官意识和对身体的精密控制。此外,亚里士多德还对动物的各种运动方式和运动部件感到好奇。事实上,亚里士多德系统地观察到了这种多样性,并认为需要对其进行科学的解释,而这正是他在短篇论文《论动物的进化》(De incessu animalium,以下简称 IA)中所阐述的内容。为了解释动物运动的多样性及其运动部位,亚里士多德依据了三条非常普遍的原则:第一,自然界没有白做的事;第二,有六个功能决定的空间方向;第三,推和拉是运动最基本的机械动作。他还制定了相关的分类法(双足/四足/多足/无足),并设计了一个高度抽象的动物身体结构概念(身体中部的单一运动起源;一定数量的外围 "运动点";弯曲是四肢的基本操作)。亚里士多德的事业很可能让我们感到陌生,因为它与林奈分类学和进化理论以及生物力学的基本原理完全脱节。然而,我们不能不为他在普遍性、系统性和解释力方面的成就所折服--所有这一切都发生在没有任何人可以依靠的情况下。虽然《内科学》提供了亚里士多德科学方法论的绝佳一瞥,但从古至今,它一直是亚里士多德研究最少的作品之一。本卷是第一部用现代语言撰写的《IA》长篇研究著作,为纠正这一不幸局面迈出了第一步。简而言之,它是我们所拥有的唯一一本《国际关系学》专著,而且在未来许多年里,它都可能是最好的专著。这本书包含希腊文的批判版、附带的英文译本以及九个部分的评注,这九个部分按顺序讨论了亚里士多德文本中的一章或几章。此外还有一些介绍性材料、参考书目、总索引和参考段落索引。希腊文文本由 Pantelis Golitsis 编写,与 1913 年 Jaeger 的文本相比有了很大改进。Golitsis 检查了五份最重要的手稿,并对最古老的手稿 Z(牛津,Corpus Christi,ms. 108)中的三个不同的手进行了区分。他还考虑了三个新的见证人,但遗憾的是,他忽略了拉丁文传统。他撰写的希腊文文本在大约 40 处背离了耶格尔的观点,并合理地偏离了第 17 章和第 18 章的传统划分。他为该文本配备了丰富而积极的批判工具。该译本是评注作者的共同作品,由安德烈亚-法尔孔(Andrea Falcon)润色,大部分内容准确,阅读流畅,术语一致,超过了两个最广泛使用的英文译本:牛津亚里士多德著作修订版》中法夸森的译本和《勒布丛书》中福斯特的译本。不过,至少有一处不准确之处值得注意:在 704b14 处,希腊文为 τοῦτον ,而译文为 τὸν αὐτόν,沿用了 Leonicus 的 eodem modo (45)。法尔孔在 IA 1-3 章(109-12,着重号为作者所加)中对 "事物以同样的方式出现在所有自然作品中 "这一读法大加赞赏,却没有注意到这一读法偏离了印刷版的希腊文文本。介绍性材料分为三个部分。第一部分是 Andrea Falcon 对亚里士多德文本的一般性介绍,很有帮助。Falcon 介绍了 IA 的议程,提出了亚里士多德要回答的 11 个问题以及该书的主要内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Since January 2002, the Journal of the History of Philosophy has been published by The Johns Hopkins University Press. For subscriptions, change of address, and back issues, please contact Subscription Services. In addition to photocopying allowed by the "fair use" doctrine, JHP authorizes personal or educational multiple-copying by instructors for use within a course. This policy does not cover photocopying for commercial use either by individuals or publishers. All such uses must be authorized by JHP.
期刊最新文献
Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos: The Philosophical Arguments by Simon Truwant (review) “The Season of Exaggerated Hopes”: Richard T. Greener in the Reconstruction University Constance Naden’s Metaphysics: Hylo-Idealism’s Ideal Known World and Unknown Matter Philosophy and the Language of the People: The Claims of Common Speech from Petrarch to Locke by Lodi Nauta (review) Materialism from Hobbes to Locke by Stewart Duncan (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1