Kvaal’s dental age estimation method applied to Brazilian adults—a cross-sectional test of validity

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL Egyptian journal of forensic sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-06 DOI:10.1186/s41935-023-00381-y
Suzana Mantovani, Adriano Petta, Marianna Arakelyan, Mariana Soares, Ademir Franco
{"title":"Kvaal’s dental age estimation method applied to Brazilian adults—a cross-sectional test of validity","authors":"Suzana Mantovani, Adriano Petta, Marianna Arakelyan, Mariana Soares, Ademir Franco","doi":"10.1186/s41935-023-00381-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dental age estimation of adults is a challenging procedure in forensic odontology. Radiographic techniques have enabled non-invasive age estimation of adults since the 90’s. Kvaal’s method based on the deposition of secondary dentin has demonstrated broad applicability in several populations. Population-specific studies with this method, however, are scarce in South America. This study tested the validity of Kvaal’s method in a sample of radiographs of Brazilian adults. The sample consisted of 192 periapical radiographs of 106 females (55.2%) and 86 males (44.8%) with ages between 20 and 80 years old. The permanent maxillary right (n = 84, 43.8%) and left (n = 108, 56.2%) central incisors were assessed based on Kvaal’s method. Lin’s coefficient of concordance between estimated (EA) and chronological (CA) ages was 0.800 (IC95% = 0.753; 0.847) (p < 0.001). The mean difference between EA and CA was − 2.84 years (p < 0.001). For females and males, separately, the mean differences between EA and CA were − 3.82 years (CI95% = − 5.38; − 2.25) (p < 0.001) and − 1.86 years (CI95% = − 3.56; − 0.17) (p = 0.031), respectively. Underestimations were predominant and increased with time. After 28 years of the original publication, Kvaal’s method remains reliable for non-invasive dental age estimation of adults, especially for the analysis of the permanent maxillary central incisors of Brazilian individuals.","PeriodicalId":11507,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian journal of forensic sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-023-00381-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental age estimation of adults is a challenging procedure in forensic odontology. Radiographic techniques have enabled non-invasive age estimation of adults since the 90’s. Kvaal’s method based on the deposition of secondary dentin has demonstrated broad applicability in several populations. Population-specific studies with this method, however, are scarce in South America. This study tested the validity of Kvaal’s method in a sample of radiographs of Brazilian adults. The sample consisted of 192 periapical radiographs of 106 females (55.2%) and 86 males (44.8%) with ages between 20 and 80 years old. The permanent maxillary right (n = 84, 43.8%) and left (n = 108, 56.2%) central incisors were assessed based on Kvaal’s method. Lin’s coefficient of concordance between estimated (EA) and chronological (CA) ages was 0.800 (IC95% = 0.753; 0.847) (p < 0.001). The mean difference between EA and CA was − 2.84 years (p < 0.001). For females and males, separately, the mean differences between EA and CA were − 3.82 years (CI95% = − 5.38; − 2.25) (p < 0.001) and − 1.86 years (CI95% = − 3.56; − 0.17) (p = 0.031), respectively. Underestimations were predominant and increased with time. After 28 years of the original publication, Kvaal’s method remains reliable for non-invasive dental age estimation of adults, especially for the analysis of the permanent maxillary central incisors of Brazilian individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适用于巴西成年人的 Kvaal 牙齿年龄估算法--有效性横断面测试
成年人的牙齿年龄估计是法医牙科学中一项具有挑战性的程序。自上世纪 90 年代以来,X 射线照相技术已经能够对成年人进行非侵入性的年龄估计。Kvaal 基于次生牙本质沉积的方法已在多个人群中得到广泛应用。然而,在南美洲,使用这种方法进行的针对特定人群的研究却很少。本研究在巴西成年人的 X 光片样本中测试了 Kvaal 方法的有效性。样本包括 192 张根尖周 X 光片,其中 106 名女性(55.2%)和 86 名男性(44.8%)的年龄在 20 至 80 岁之间。根据 Kvaal 方法评估了上颌右侧(84 人,占 43.8%)和左侧(108 人,占 56.2%)永久中切牙。估计年龄(EA)与年代年龄(CA)之间的林氏一致系数为 0.800(IC95% = 0.753; 0.847)(P < 0.001)。EA 与 CA 之间的平均年龄差为 - 2.84 岁(p < 0.001)。就女性和男性而言,EA 和 CA 之间的平均差异分别为 - 3.82 年 (CI95% = - 5.38; - 2.25) (p < 0.001) 和 - 1.86 年 (CI95% = - 3.56; - 0.17) (p = 0.031)。低估是主要现象,并随着时间的推移而增加。在最初发表 28 年后的今天,Kvaal 的方法对于成人非侵入性牙齿年龄估计仍然是可靠的,尤其是在分析巴西人的上颌恒中切牙时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, the official publication of The International Association of Law and Forensic Sciences (IALFS), is an open access journal that publishes articles in the forensic sciences, pathology and clinical forensic medicine and its related specialities. The journal carries classic reviews, case studies, original research, hypotheses and learning points, offering critical analysis and scientific appraisal.
期刊最新文献
Impact of ante-mortem fluoxetine administration on estimation of post-mortem interval and insect activity in rabbit carcasses Sex estimation based on glabella morphology in contemporary Brazilian human skulls Does the distribution of Wormian bone frequencies across different world regions reflect genetic affinity between populations? Particulate matter in necropsy activities: experience from a health operators’ exposure monitoring campaign Knowledge and attitude of university nursing students towards forensic nursing and their influencing factors: a mixed-methods study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1