Diagnostic reference levels in spinal CT: Jordanian assessments and global benchmarks.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/XST-230276
Mohammad Rawashdeh, Abdel-Baset Bani Yaseen, Mark McEntee, Andrew England, Praveen Kumar, Charbel Saade
{"title":"Diagnostic reference levels in spinal CT: Jordanian assessments and global benchmarks.","authors":"Mohammad Rawashdeh, Abdel-Baset Bani Yaseen, Mark McEntee, Andrew England, Praveen Kumar, Charbel Saade","doi":"10.3233/XST-230276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To reduce radiation dose and subsequent risks, several legislative documents in different countries describe the need for Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Spinal radiography is a common and high-dose examination. Therefore, the aim of this work was to establish the DRL for Computed Tomography (CT) examinations of the spine in healthcare institutions across Jordan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrieved from the picture archiving and communications system (PACS), which included the CT Dose Index (CTDI (vol) ) and Dose Length Product (DLP). The median radiation dose values of the dosimetric indices were calculated for each site. DRL values were defined as the 75th percentile distribution of the median CTDI (vol)  and DLP values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was collected from 659 CT examinations (316 cervical spine and 343 lumbar-sacral spine). Of the participants, 68% were males, and the patients' mean weight was 69.7 kg (minimum = 60; maximum = 80, SD = 8.9). The 75th percentile for the DLP of cervical and LS-spine CT scans in Jordan were 565.2 and 967.7 mGy.cm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research demonstrates a wide range of variability in CTDI (vol)  and DLP values for spinal CT examinations; these variations were associated with the acquisition protocol and highlight the need to optimize radiation dose in spinal CT examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"725-734"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-230276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To reduce radiation dose and subsequent risks, several legislative documents in different countries describe the need for Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Spinal radiography is a common and high-dose examination. Therefore, the aim of this work was to establish the DRL for Computed Tomography (CT) examinations of the spine in healthcare institutions across Jordan.

Methods: Data was retrieved from the picture archiving and communications system (PACS), which included the CT Dose Index (CTDI (vol) ) and Dose Length Product (DLP). The median radiation dose values of the dosimetric indices were calculated for each site. DRL values were defined as the 75th percentile distribution of the median CTDI (vol)  and DLP values.

Results: Data was collected from 659 CT examinations (316 cervical spine and 343 lumbar-sacral spine). Of the participants, 68% were males, and the patients' mean weight was 69.7 kg (minimum = 60; maximum = 80, SD = 8.9). The 75th percentile for the DLP of cervical and LS-spine CT scans in Jordan were 565.2 and 967.7 mGy.cm, respectively.

Conclusions: This research demonstrates a wide range of variability in CTDI (vol)  and DLP values for spinal CT examinations; these variations were associated with the acquisition protocol and highlight the need to optimize radiation dose in spinal CT examinations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊柱 CT 诊断参考水平:约旦评估和全球基准。
背景:为了减少辐射剂量和随之而来的风险,不同国家的一些立法文件都说明了诊断参考水平(DRLs)的必要性。脊柱放射摄影是一种常见的高剂量检查。因此,这项工作旨在确定约旦各地医疗机构脊柱计算机断层扫描(CT)检查的诊断参考水平:方法:从图片存档和通信系统(PACS)中获取数据,其中包括 CT 剂量指数(CTDI(vol))和剂量长度乘积(DLP)。计算了每个部位剂量指数的辐射剂量中值。DRL 值被定义为 CTDI(体积)和 DLP 中值的第 75 百分位数分布:从 659 次 CT 检查(316 次颈椎检查和 343 次腰骶椎检查)中收集了数据。其中,68%为男性,患者的平均体重为69.7千克(最小值=60;最大值=80,SD=8.9)。约旦颈椎和腰椎 CT 扫描 DLP 的第 75 百分位数分别为 565.2 和 967.7 mGy.cm:这项研究表明,脊柱 CT 检查的 CTDI(体积)和 DLP 值的变化范围很大;这些变化与采集方案有关,并强调了优化脊柱 CT 检查辐射剂量的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
23.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Research areas within the scope of the journal include: Interaction of x-rays with matter: x-ray phenomena, biological effects of radiation, radiation safety and optical constants X-ray sources: x-rays from synchrotrons, x-ray lasers, plasmas, and other sources, conventional or unconventional Optical elements: grazing incidence optics, multilayer mirrors, zone plates, gratings, other diffraction optics Optical instruments: interferometers, spectrometers, microscopes, telescopes, microprobes
期刊最新文献
Industrial digital radiographic image denoising based on improved KBNet. Research on the effectiveness of multi-view slice correction strategy based on deep learning in high pitch helical CT reconstruction. A fully linearized ADMM algorithm for optimization based image reconstruction. A reconstruction method for ptychography based on residual dense network. Can AI generate diagnostic reports for radiologist approval on CXR images? A multi-reader and multi-case observer performance study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1