Robotic Radical Nephrectomy with Vena Cava Thrombus Extraction (RRN-VCTE) for Renal Cell Carcinoma

IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i1.288
D. Coco, S. Leanza
{"title":"Robotic Radical Nephrectomy with Vena Cava Thrombus Extraction (RRN-VCTE) for Renal Cell Carcinoma","authors":"D. Coco, S. Leanza","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i1.288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with vena cava tumor thrombus is a challenging condition, which requires complex surgical management. Robotic radical nephrectomy with vena cava thrombus extraction (RRN-VCTE) has emerged as a promising and minimally invasive technique. This meta-analysis aims to review the surgical technique and outcomes of RRN-VCTE in patients with RCC and vena cava tumor thrombus. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Studies published in English till October 2021 were included. Keywords used for the search included “robotic radical nephrectomy,” “vena cava tumor thrombus,” “surgical technique,” and “outcomes.” Studies that reported on patient outcomes and surgical techniques of RRN-VCTE were included. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the pooled outcomes. The meta-analysis included 16 studies comprising 298 patients who underwent RRN-VCTE. The majority of patients were males (62.4%) with a median age of 58.9 years. The median tumor size was 7.2 cm, and 93.9% of patients had level 3 or 4 vena cava thrombus. The mean operating time was 328 min, with a range of 248–423 min. Blood loss ranged from 100 to 1500 mL. The overall complication rate was 26.5%, with no reported deaths. The average hospital stay was 9.5 days. The 2-year and and 5-year survival rates were 77.5 and 53.1%, respectively. RRN-VCTE is a promising and minimally invasive surgical technique for RCC with vena cava tumor thrombus, whch is associated with low complication rates and acceptable oncological outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm the long-term survival rates and compare RRN-VCTE outcomes with conventional surgical techniques. Nonetheless, RRN-VCTE appears to be a valuable option for patients with RCC and vena cava tumor thrombus.","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"45 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i1.288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with vena cava tumor thrombus is a challenging condition, which requires complex surgical management. Robotic radical nephrectomy with vena cava thrombus extraction (RRN-VCTE) has emerged as a promising and minimally invasive technique. This meta-analysis aims to review the surgical technique and outcomes of RRN-VCTE in patients with RCC and vena cava tumor thrombus. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Studies published in English till October 2021 were included. Keywords used for the search included “robotic radical nephrectomy,” “vena cava tumor thrombus,” “surgical technique,” and “outcomes.” Studies that reported on patient outcomes and surgical techniques of RRN-VCTE were included. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the pooled outcomes. The meta-analysis included 16 studies comprising 298 patients who underwent RRN-VCTE. The majority of patients were males (62.4%) with a median age of 58.9 years. The median tumor size was 7.2 cm, and 93.9% of patients had level 3 or 4 vena cava thrombus. The mean operating time was 328 min, with a range of 248–423 min. Blood loss ranged from 100 to 1500 mL. The overall complication rate was 26.5%, with no reported deaths. The average hospital stay was 9.5 days. The 2-year and and 5-year survival rates were 77.5 and 53.1%, respectively. RRN-VCTE is a promising and minimally invasive surgical technique for RCC with vena cava tumor thrombus, whch is associated with low complication rates and acceptable oncological outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm the long-term survival rates and compare RRN-VCTE outcomes with conventional surgical techniques. Nonetheless, RRN-VCTE appears to be a valuable option for patients with RCC and vena cava tumor thrombus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人根治性肾切除术与腔静脉血栓抽取术(RRN-VCTE)治疗肾细胞癌
伴有腔静脉瘤栓的肾细胞癌(RCC)是一种具有挑战性的疾病,需要复杂的手术治疗。机器人根治性肾切除术(RRN-VCTE)是一种很有前景的微创技术。本荟萃分析旨在回顾 RCC 和腔静脉肿瘤血栓患者的 RRN-VCTE 手术技术和疗效。我们使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 等数据库进行了全面的文献检索。纳入了截至 2021 年 10 月以英文发表的研究。搜索关键词包括 "机器人根治性肾切除术"、"腔静脉肿瘤血栓"、"手术技术 "和 "结果"。纳入了报告 RRN-VCTE 患者预后和手术技术的研究。对汇总结果进行了统计分析。荟萃分析包括 16 项研究,共有 298 名患者接受了 RRN-VCTE 治疗。大多数患者为男性(62.4%),中位年龄为58.9岁。肿瘤中位大小为 7.2 厘米,93.9% 的患者有 3 级或 4 级腔静脉血栓。平均手术时间为328分钟,范围在248-423分钟之间。失血量从100毫升到1500毫升不等。总体并发症发生率为26.5%,无死亡报告。平均住院时间为 9.5 天。2年和5年存活率分别为77.5%和53.1%。RRN-VCTE是一种治疗伴有腔静脉肿瘤血栓的RCC的前景看好的微创手术技术,并发症发生率低,肿瘤治疗效果可接受。还需要进一步的研究来确认长期存活率,并将 RRN-VCTE 的疗效与传统手术技术进行比较。尽管如此,RRN-VCTE 似乎是 RCC 和腔静脉肿瘤血栓患者的一个有价值的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Surveillance in Children and Adolescents with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)-Related Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: A Survey of MET and Freiburg-VHL Registries in Germany. Avoidable Benign Kidney Tumor Resections-Data from a Tertiary Care Cancer Institute. Primary Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor of Kidney: An Uncommon Renal Neoplasm. Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Differentiation (osteosarcomatous and chondrosarcomatous differentiation)-A Case Report and Comprehensive Review. An Uncommon Case of Sinonasal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Metastatic to the Kidney Treated with Metastasectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1