首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL最新文献

英文 中文
Avoidable Benign Kidney Tumor Resections-Data from a Tertiary Care Cancer Institute. 可避免的良性肾肿瘤切除术--来自一家三级癌症研究所的数据。
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i4.286
Arun Ramdas Menon, Vivek Patel, Nivedita Suresh, Anand Raja

Enhancing renal masses are conventionally treated as malignant unless proven otherwise due to the difficulty distinguishing between malignant and benign tumors based on imaging. Data from the Western registries suggests overtreatment of renal tumors with a Benign Kidney Tumor Resection Rate (BKTRR) ranging from 10 to 33%, with an increasing trend. Since robust, population-based data from India was unavailable, we sought to determine BKTRR in an apex cancer institute, which would provide insight into the rates in the community. The institutional kidney tumor database was queried for all patients aged ≥18 years with renal neoplasms between January 2000 and December 2022. Patients who underwent surgery, either radical or partial nephrectomy, with intent to cure were analyzed and the BKTRR during the study period was evaluated. A total of 330 patients underwent surgery for renal tumors presumed to be malignant. A final pathologic diagnosis of the benign tumor was made in 16 (4.8%) patients, comprising 7.2, 7.2, and 3.7% of resections with LTD ≤4, 4-7, and >7 cm, respectively. Asymptomatic benign tumors ≤7 cm comprised 3.0% of all resections, and these were potentially unnecessary surgeries. A multivariable analysis suggested that no patient or imaging characteristic could predict a final benign extirpative pathology. Our study suggests a lower rate of BKTRR compared to the published international literature but is likely to be the lower limit of that in the community. Population-based studies are required to determine the true BKTRR and the quantum of potentially unnecessary surgeries for benign kidney tumors.

由于根据影像学很难区分恶性肿瘤和良性肿瘤,除非另有证明,否则增大的肾脏肿块通常被视为恶性肿瘤。来自西方登记处的数据显示,良性肾脏肿瘤切除率(BKTRR)在 10% 到 33% 之间,且呈上升趋势,表明肾脏肿瘤治疗过度。由于无法获得印度基于人口的可靠数据,我们试图确定一家顶级癌症研究所的良性肾肿瘤切除率,从而了解社区的良性肾肿瘤切除率。我们在该机构的肾肿瘤数据库中查询了 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月间所有年龄≥18 岁的肾肿瘤患者。对接受根治性或部分肾切除手术的患者进行了分析,并评估了研究期间的BKTRR。共有330名患者因肾脏肿瘤假定为恶性而接受了手术。最终病理诊断为良性肿瘤的患者有16例(4.8%),分别占LTD≤4、4-7和>7厘米切除术的7.2%、7.2%和3.7%。≤7厘米的无症状良性肿瘤占所有切除手术的3.0%,这些手术可能是不必要的。多变量分析表明,没有任何患者或影像学特征可以预测最终的良性切除病理结果。我们的研究表明,与已发表的国际文献相比,BKTRR 的发生率较低,但很可能是社区中发生率的下限。要确定真正的 BKTRR 和良性肾肿瘤潜在不必要手术的数量,还需要进行基于人群的研究。
{"title":"Avoidable Benign Kidney Tumor Resections-Data from a Tertiary Care Cancer Institute.","authors":"Arun Ramdas Menon, Vivek Patel, Nivedita Suresh, Anand Raja","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i4.286","DOIUrl":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i4.286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhancing renal masses are conventionally treated as malignant unless proven otherwise due to the difficulty distinguishing between malignant and benign tumors based on imaging. Data from the Western registries suggests overtreatment of renal tumors with a Benign Kidney Tumor Resection Rate (BKTRR) ranging from 10 to 33%, with an increasing trend. Since robust, population-based data from India was unavailable, we sought to determine BKTRR in an apex cancer institute, which would provide insight into the rates in the community. The institutional kidney tumor database was queried for all patients aged ≥18 years with renal neoplasms between January 2000 and December 2022. Patients who underwent surgery, either radical or partial nephrectomy, with intent to cure were analyzed and the BKTRR during the study period was evaluated. A total of 330 patients underwent surgery for renal tumors presumed to be malignant. A final pathologic diagnosis of the benign tumor was made in 16 (4.8%) patients, comprising 7.2, 7.2, and 3.7% of resections with LTD ≤4, 4-7, and >7 cm, respectively. Asymptomatic benign tumors ≤7 cm comprised 3.0% of all resections, and these were potentially unnecessary surgeries. A multivariable analysis suggested that no patient or imaging characteristic could predict a final benign extirpative pathology. Our study suggests a lower rate of BKTRR compared to the published international literature but is likely to be the lower limit of that in the community. Population-based studies are required to determine the true BKTRR and the quantum of potentially unnecessary surgeries for benign kidney tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 4","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415627/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142362196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Primary Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor of Kidney: An Uncommon Renal Neoplasm. 肾脏原发性非肉芽肿性生殖细胞瘤:一种不常见的肾肿瘤
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i4.335
Sonu Plash, Deepti Soni, Sramana Mukhopadhyay, Moorat Singh Yadav, Devashish Kaushal, Ketan Mehra

Germ cell tumor (GCT) is a neoplasm typically found in childhood, commonly originating from the testis or ovary. While there have been reported cases of GCT occurring in various extragonadal sites, primary intrarenal GCT is exceptionally rare. We present a case of 37-year-old male who presented with right upper abdomen pain. Imaging revealed a sizable mass within the right kidney. The patient underwent surgical resection of the renal mass during which there was perirenal infiltration into the duodenum and dense desmoplastic reaction all around. Subsequent histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of primary intrarenal nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). The patient underwent four cycles of adjuvant bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy; at 6 months of follow-up, he is fine. The objective of this case report is to underscore the importance of considering NSGCT as a potential rare differential diagnosis in cases of renal neoplasms and further plan for the management.

生殖细胞瘤(GCT)是一种典型的儿童肿瘤,通常起源于睾丸或卵巢。虽然有报道称生殖细胞瘤发生在睾丸外的不同部位,但原发性肾内生殖细胞瘤却异常罕见。我们接诊了一例因右上腹疼痛就诊的 37 岁男性患者。影像学检查发现右肾内有一个相当大的肿块。患者接受了肾肿块手术切除,术中发现肾周浸润至十二指肠,周围出现致密的去瘤反应。随后的组织病理学确诊为原发性肾内非肉芽肿性生殖细胞瘤(NSGCT)。患者接受了四个周期的博莱霉素、依托泊苷和顺铂(BEP)辅助化疗。本病例报告旨在强调将 NSGCT 作为肾肿瘤病例中潜在的罕见鉴别诊断的重要性,并进一步规划治疗方案。
{"title":"Primary Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor of Kidney: An Uncommon Renal Neoplasm.","authors":"Sonu Plash, Deepti Soni, Sramana Mukhopadhyay, Moorat Singh Yadav, Devashish Kaushal, Ketan Mehra","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i4.335","DOIUrl":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i4.335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Germ cell tumor (GCT) is a neoplasm typically found in childhood, commonly originating from the testis or ovary. While there have been reported cases of GCT occurring in various extragonadal sites, primary intrarenal GCT is exceptionally rare. We present a case of 37-year-old male who presented with right upper abdomen pain. Imaging revealed a sizable mass within the right kidney. The patient underwent surgical resection of the renal mass during which there was perirenal infiltration into the duodenum and dense desmoplastic reaction all around. Subsequent histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of primary intrarenal nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). The patient underwent four cycles of adjuvant bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy; at 6 months of follow-up, he is fine. The objective of this case report is to underscore the importance of considering NSGCT as a potential rare differential diagnosis in cases of renal neoplasms and further plan for the management.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 4","pages":"10-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447487/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Differentiation (osteosarcomatous and chondrosarcomatous differentiation)-A Case Report and Comprehensive Review. 伴肉瘤样分化(骨肉瘤样和软骨肉瘤样分化)的Chromophobe肾细胞癌--病例报告和全面综述。
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.343
Meenakshi Rao, Anju G, Shiv Charan Navriya, Binit Sureka, Jeena Raju Kudunthail

Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (ChRCCs) have a good prognosis and comprise approximately 5-7% of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). The sarcomatoid differentiation in RCC is found in around 5-10% of cases; however, in ChRCC, it is much less than in other RCCs and poorly responds to chemotherapeutic agents. A study by de Peralta-Venturina et al. found 9% sarcomatoid differentiation in chromophobe RCC. We present the case of a 58-year-old female with a left abdominal mass diagnosed as ChRCC with the existence of sarcomatous differentiation including osteosarcomatous and chondrosarcomatous, which are of adverse prognosis. Osteosarcoma-like divergent differentiation in RCC is extremely rare, with limited documented cases. It should be carefully considered in evaluating and managing renal masses due to its potential impact on clinical outcomes.

嗜铬细胞肾细胞癌(Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas,ChRCC)预后良好,约占肾细胞癌(RCC)的 5-7%。RCC中肉瘤样分化的病例约占5%-10%;然而,ChRCC的肉瘤样分化程度远低于其他RCC,而且对化疗药物的反应较差。de Peralta-Venturina 等人的研究发现,嗜色性 RCC 中肉瘤样分化率为 9%。我们介绍了一例 58 岁女性的病例,她的左腹部肿块被诊断为 ChRCC,存在肉瘤样分化,包括骨肉瘤样和软骨肉瘤样,预后不良。骨肉瘤样分化在 RCC 中极为罕见,记录在案的病例有限。由于其对临床结果的潜在影响,在评估和管理肾肿块时应谨慎考虑。
{"title":"Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Differentiation (osteosarcomatous and chondrosarcomatous differentiation)-A Case Report and Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Meenakshi Rao, Anju G, Shiv Charan Navriya, Binit Sureka, Jeena Raju Kudunthail","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.343","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (ChRCCs) have a good prognosis and comprise approximately 5-7% of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). The sarcomatoid differentiation in RCC is found in around 5-10% of cases; however, in ChRCC, it is much less than in other RCCs and poorly responds to chemotherapeutic agents. A study by de Peralta-Venturina et al. found 9% sarcomatoid differentiation in chromophobe RCC. We present the case of a 58-year-old female with a left abdominal mass diagnosed as ChRCC with the existence of sarcomatous differentiation including osteosarcomatous and chondrosarcomatous, which are of adverse prognosis. Osteosarcoma-like divergent differentiation in RCC is extremely rare, with limited documented cases. It should be carefully considered in evaluating and managing renal masses due to its potential impact on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 3","pages":"59-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11397982/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Uncommon Case of Sinonasal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Metastatic to the Kidney Treated with Metastasectomy. 通过转移灶切除术治疗转移至肾脏的鼻窦腺样囊性癌的罕见病例。
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.306
Alyssa M Lombardo, Tyler Sheetz, Ricardo L Carrau, Debra L Zynger, Eric A Singer

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare tumor, accounting for 1% of all head and neck cancers, with an aggressive nature characterized by local recurrence, delayed metastasis, and survival of less than 50% at 10 years. This is a case of biopsy-proven ACC to the kidney, 1 of 29 known occurrences, managed by metastasectomy by robotic-assisted nephrectomy, with plans for resection of lung metastasis. Thirteen years after diagnosis of sinonasal ACC treated with resection, the patient presented with shortness of breath. This prompted a CT scan of the chest, which led to the incidental finding of left renal mass and pulmonary lesion. Literature suggests improved disease-specific survival in locoregional recurrence treated with surgery versus radiation; in patients with metastasis to the lung, metastasectomy offers greater survival benefit than supportive therapy. But, this is not significantly better than chemotherapy or radiation alone. While the optimal therapeutic approach remains to be identified in distant metastatic ACC, metastasectomy remains a viable option for patients who have potentially completely resectable metastatic tumors, appropriate performance status, and adequate affected-organ function. Preoperative counseling should include discussion on partial nephrectomy with prioritization of nephron-sparing but potential for increased perioperative risk versus radical nephrectomy to ensure negative margins and expedite timeline to systemic therapy.

腺样囊性癌(ACC)是一种罕见肿瘤,占所有头颈部癌症的1%,具有侵袭性,特点是局部复发、延迟转移,10年生存率低于50%。这是一例经活检证实的肾脏 ACC 病例,是 29 例已知病例中的 1 例,通过机器人辅助肾切除术进行转移切除,并计划切除肺转移灶。在确诊鼻窦 ACC 并进行切除治疗 13 年后,患者出现呼吸急促。这促使他进行了胸部 CT 扫描,结果意外发现了左肾肿块和肺部病变。文献表明,手术治疗与放射治疗相比,可提高局部区域复发患者的疾病特异性生存率;对于转移至肺部的患者,转移灶切除术比支持疗法更能提高生存率。但这并不明显优于单纯化疗或放疗。虽然远处转移性 ACC 的最佳治疗方法仍有待确定,但对于可能完全切除转移性肿瘤、表现状况良好且受累器官功能正常的患者来说,转移瘤切除术仍是一种可行的选择。术前咨询应包括讨论肾部分切除术与根治性肾切除术,前者优先考虑保留肾脏,但可能增加围手术期风险,后者则确保阴性边缘并加快系统治疗的时间。
{"title":"An Uncommon Case of Sinonasal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Metastatic to the Kidney Treated with Metastasectomy.","authors":"Alyssa M Lombardo, Tyler Sheetz, Ricardo L Carrau, Debra L Zynger, Eric A Singer","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.306","DOIUrl":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare tumor, accounting for 1% of all head and neck cancers, with an aggressive nature characterized by local recurrence, delayed metastasis, and survival of less than 50% at 10 years. This is a case of biopsy-proven ACC to the kidney, 1 of 29 known occurrences, managed by metastasectomy by robotic-assisted nephrectomy, with plans for resection of lung metastasis. Thirteen years after diagnosis of sinonasal ACC treated with resection, the patient presented with shortness of breath. This prompted a CT scan of the chest, which led to the incidental finding of left renal mass and pulmonary lesion. Literature suggests improved disease-specific survival in locoregional recurrence treated with surgery versus radiation; in patients with metastasis to the lung, metastasectomy offers greater survival benefit than supportive therapy. But, this is not significantly better than chemotherapy or radiation alone. While the optimal therapeutic approach remains to be identified in distant metastatic ACC, metastasectomy remains a viable option for patients who have potentially completely resectable metastatic tumors, appropriate performance status, and adequate affected-organ function. Preoperative counseling should include discussion on partial nephrectomy with prioritization of nephron-sparing but potential for increased perioperative risk versus radical nephrectomy to ensure negative margins and expedite timeline to systemic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 3","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142126904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients Ineligible for Front-line Clinical Trials. 不符合一线临床试验条件的转移性肾细胞癌 (mRCC) 患者的临床结果。
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.352
Nathan Reynolds, Wei Wei, Kimberly Maroli, Amanda Bonham, Amanda Nizam, Timothy D Gilligan, Christopher Wee, Shilpa Gupta, Moshe C Ornstein

Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.

以免疫疗法为基础的转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)临床试验有广泛的纳入和排除标准。我们调查了一组现实世界中不符合mRCC一线试验纳入标准的患者的临床疗效。我们确定了接受ipilimumab/nivolumab和axitinib/pembrolizumab治疗的一线mRCC患者,并根据其各自的3期注册试验的主要纳入或排除标准将其分为符合临床试验条件(CTE)和不符合临床试验条件(CTI)队列。比较了 CTE 和 CTI 组群的临床结果。共确定了62名接受阿西替尼/pembrolizumab治疗的患者和103名接受伊匹单抗/nivolumab治疗的患者。阿西替尼/pembrolizumab和伊匹单抗/nivolumab队列中的CTE和CTI患者采用的国际转移性RCC数据库联盟(IMDC)标准相似。在阿西替尼/pembrolizumab队列(n = 62)中,有24名(39%)患者为CTI。不符合条件的主要原因是实验室异常(11 例)、组织学异常(9 例)和脑转移(3 例)。反应率无明显差异(P = 0.08)。从数字上看,CTE 患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)更长(28 个月对 12 个月;P = 0.09)。CTE患者的总生存期(OS)更长(P = 0.02)。在ipilimumab/nivolumab队列(n = 103)中,59人(57%)为CTI。不符合条件的最常见原因是脑转移(n = 18)、实验室异常(n = 16)和组织学(n = 16)。反应率无明显差异(P = 0.22)。然而,CTE 患者的 PFS(P = 0.003)和 OS(P < 0.0001)更高。总之,现实世界中有许多患者不符合 RCC 临床试验的条件,与符合试验条件的患者相比,他们的预后更差。需要为这些患者提供更多的治疗方案,并制定策略将他们纳入前瞻性试验。
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients Ineligible for Front-line Clinical Trials.","authors":"Nathan Reynolds, Wei Wei, Kimberly Maroli, Amanda Bonham, Amanda Nizam, Timothy D Gilligan, Christopher Wee, Shilpa Gupta, Moshe C Ornstein","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.352","DOIUrl":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.352","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 3","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370811/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142126905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Approach to Diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Limited Resource Setting: A Case Report. 在资源有限的环境中诊断 TFE3 重排肾细胞癌的方法:病例报告。
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.338
Allison Kaye Lombridas Pagarigan, Pamela Delos Reyes-Murillo, Dennis Jose Sienes Carbonell

This report recounts the diagnostic workup of a pediatric female who presented with hematuria secondary to a large renal mass visualized on abdominal imaging. Histologic assessment and subsequent immunohistochemistry studies were performed. Intense, unequivocal immunohistochemical expression of TFE3 and alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase with corresponding negativity for carbonic anhydrase IX, along with highly distinctive clinical, radiologic, gross, and microscopic findings confirmed the diagnosis of a renal cell carcinoma with TFE3 gene rearrangement - the first ever reported case in the Philippines. This case highlights the vital role and significant diagnostic impact of reliable, affordable and accessible immunohistochemistry studies in low-resource settings where molecular modalities for evaluating rare diseases are largely unavailable. Recognition of distinctive morphologic, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic features in childhood and adolescent renal malignancies allows for the timely institution of therapeutic interventions for this aggressive entity.

本报告叙述了一名女性儿童的诊断过程,她因腹部造影发现巨大肾肿块而出现血尿。对其进行了组织学评估和随后的免疫组化研究。TFE3和α-甲基酰-CoA-racemase的免疫组化表达强烈而明确,碳酸酐酶IX相应呈阴性,加上非常独特的临床、放射学、大体和显微镜检查结果,确诊为TFE3基因重排的肾细胞癌,这在菲律宾尚属首例。在资源匮乏的环境中,评估罕见疾病的分子模式基本不存在,本病例凸显了可靠、可负担和可获得的免疫组化研究的重要作用和重大诊断影响。认识到儿童和青少年肾脏恶性肿瘤的独特形态学、免疫组化和细胞遗传学特征,就能及时对这种侵袭性实体进行治疗干预。
{"title":"Approach to Diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Limited Resource Setting: A Case Report.","authors":"Allison Kaye Lombridas Pagarigan, Pamela Delos Reyes-Murillo, Dennis Jose Sienes Carbonell","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.338","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report recounts the diagnostic workup of a pediatric female who presented with hematuria secondary to a large renal mass visualized on abdominal imaging. Histologic assessment and subsequent immunohistochemistry studies were performed. Intense, unequivocal immunohistochemical expression of TFE3 and alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase with corresponding negativity for carbonic anhydrase IX, along with highly distinctive clinical, radiologic, gross, and microscopic findings confirmed the diagnosis of a renal cell carcinoma with TFE3 gene rearrangement - the first ever reported case in the Philippines. This case highlights the vital role and significant diagnostic impact of reliable, affordable and accessible immunohistochemistry studies in low-resource settings where molecular modalities for evaluating rare diseases are largely unavailable. Recognition of distinctive morphologic, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic features in childhood and adolescent renal malignancies allows for the timely institution of therapeutic interventions for this aggressive entity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 3","pages":"40-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11350386/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epithelial Predominant Wilms Tumor in an Adult Patient: Case Report and Literature Review. 一名成年患者的上皮主导型 Wilms 肿瘤:病例报告与文献综述
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.329
Sofia Chapman, Benjamin Lichtbroun, Hiren Patel, Sai Krishnaraya Doppalapudi, Hatim Thaker, Colton Smith, Cristo Guardado Salazar, Scott Moerdler, Saum Ghodoussipour

Although rare in adults, Wilms tumor is the most common pediatric renal tumor. Treatment typically involves radical nephrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation, although outcomes differ between children and adults which may be due to challenges in accurately diagnosing these patients. In this article, we present a case report of an adult patient with Jeune syndrome and multiple urologic abnormalities who underwent radical nephrectomy for a large renal mass and was subsequently diagnosed with an epithelial predominant Wilms tumor. Epithelial predominant Wilms tumor may have distinct origins from other Wilms tumor histological subtypes and may incur better outcomes. Herein, we discuss the literature surrounding this rare entity as well as the anticipated treatment course.

Wilms 肿瘤虽然在成人中罕见,但却是最常见的儿科肾肿瘤。治疗通常包括根治性肾切除术,然后进行辅助化疗或放疗,但儿童和成人的治疗效果不同,这可能是由于准确诊断这些患者所面临的挑战。本文报告了一例患有 Jeune 综合征和多种泌尿系统异常的成年患者的病例,该患者因巨大肾肿块接受了根治性肾切除术,随后被诊断为上皮占位性 Wilms 肿瘤。上皮占优势的 Wilms 肿瘤可能与其他 Wilms 肿瘤组织学亚型有不同的起源,并可能带来更好的治疗效果。在此,我们将讨论有关这一罕见实体的文献以及预期的治疗过程。
{"title":"Epithelial Predominant Wilms Tumor in an Adult Patient: Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Sofia Chapman, Benjamin Lichtbroun, Hiren Patel, Sai Krishnaraya Doppalapudi, Hatim Thaker, Colton Smith, Cristo Guardado Salazar, Scott Moerdler, Saum Ghodoussipour","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.329","DOIUrl":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although rare in adults, Wilms tumor is the most common pediatric renal tumor. Treatment typically involves radical nephrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation, although outcomes differ between children and adults which may be due to challenges in accurately diagnosing these patients. In this article, we present a case report of an adult patient with Jeune syndrome and multiple urologic abnormalities who underwent radical nephrectomy for a large renal mass and was subsequently diagnosed with an epithelial predominant Wilms tumor. Epithelial predominant Wilms tumor may have distinct origins from other Wilms tumor histological subtypes and may incur better outcomes. Herein, we discuss the literature surrounding this rare entity as well as the anticipated treatment course.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 3","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325451/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Trifecta and Pentafecta Outcomes across 3 Surgical Modalities of Partial Nephrectomy (PN) - Open, Lap, and Robotic. 开腹、腹腔镜和机器人三种肾部分切除术 (PN) 手术方式的三联疗法和五联疗法效果比较。
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.308
Hiranya Deka, N Mallikarjunarao Medam, Ginil Kumar P, Vishnu P, Manav Gideon, Achuth Ajith Kumar, Yensani Prashanth Reddy, Shivraj Barath Kumar

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common solid tumor in the kidney (90%), accounting for about 3% of all cancers in adults. Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the surgical procedure primarily used for the treatment of localized kidney tumors. Two commonly used terms to describe the complexity and success of a partial nephrectomy procedure are "trifecta" and "pentafecta." Trifecta is defined as Warm ischemia time (WIT) ≤ 25min or Cold ischemia time (CIT) ≤ 60min, Negative surgical margin (NSM), and no perioperative Clavien-Dindo complications (CDC) of Gr 3 or more [8], whereas pentafecta is defined as trifecta plus >90% preservation of e-Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and no increase in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage at 12-months post-operative period. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent partial nephrectomy at a single high-volume tertiary centre, from 2012 to 2020. We included patients who underwent partial nephrectomy by any of the three routes including open (OPN), laparoscopic (LPN), or robotic-assisted (RPN), and in which the follow-up data was available. We compared the trifecta and pentafecta outcomes across the three surgical modalities. We had a total of 183 patients in our study. Twenty-nine percent (53 patients) underwent open surgery, 12.6% (23 patients) underwent laparoscopic surgery and 58.5% (107) underwent robotic assisted surgery. The number of patients who fell under the low risk category in the RENAL scoring system were 70(38.3%), intermediate risk 79 (43.2%) and high risk 34 (18.6%). In the high risk RENAL score group, trifecta was achieved in 5 (50%) patients in OPN, 1(50%) in LPN and 7(31.8%) in RPN with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.581) whereas pentafecta was achieved in 3 (30%) patients in OPN, 1 (50%) in LPN and 7 (31.8%) in RPN with no statistically significant difference (0.855). In the overall cohort, mean WIT, mean hospital stay and mean EBL were higher in OPN as compared to LPN and RPN which was statistically significant (p < 0.001), whereas there was no statistical difference in mean operative time between the three modalities (p = 0.580). Renal tumors can be safely treated by RPN or LPN with lesser morbidity as compared to OPN. Trifecta and Pentafecta outcomes had no significant difference among OPN, LPN, and RPN. RPN and LPN may be considered feasible and safe surgical approaches ensuring good functional outcomes.

肾细胞癌(RCC)是肾脏中最常见的实体瘤(占 90%),约占成人癌症总数的 3%。肾部分切除术(PN)是主要用于治疗局部肾肿瘤的手术方法。描述肾部分切除术的复杂性和成功率的两个常用术语是 "三连胜 "和 "五连胜"。三连冠的定义是热缺血时间(WIT)≤25分钟或冷缺血时间(CIT)≤60分钟、手术切缘阴性(NSM)、围手术期无3级或以上的克拉维恩-丁多并发症(CDC)[8],而五连冠的定义是三连冠加上e-肾小球滤过率(GFR)保持率大于90%以及术后12个月慢性肾脏病(CKD)分期无增加。我们回顾性分析了 2012 年至 2020 年在一家高容量三级中心接受肾部分切除术的所有患者。我们纳入了通过开腹(OPN)、腹腔镜(LPN)或机器人辅助(RPN)等三种途径中的任何一种接受肾部分切除术且有随访数据的患者。我们比较了三种手术方式的三联和五联结果。我们的研究中共有 183 名患者。29%(53 名患者)接受了开腹手术,12.6%(23 名患者)接受了腹腔镜手术,58.5%(107 名患者)接受了机器人辅助手术。在 RENAL 评分系统中,属于低风险类别的患者有 70 人(38.3%),中风险 79 人(43.2%),高风险 34 人(18.6%)。在高风险 RENAL 评分组中,OPN 有 5 名(50%)患者达到三连冠,LPN 有 1 名(50%)患者达到三连冠,RPN 有 7 名(31.8%)患者达到三连冠,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.581),而 OPN 有 3 名(30%)患者达到五连冠,LPN 有 1 名(50%)患者达到五连冠,RPN 有 7 名(31.8%)患者达到五连冠,差异无统计学意义(0.855)。在总体队列中,OPN 的平均 WIT、平均住院时间和平均 EBL 均高于 LPN 和 RPN,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),而三种方式的平均手术时间没有统计学差异(P = 0.580)。与 OPN 相比,RPN 或 LPN 可以安全地治疗肾肿瘤,且发病率较低。OPN、LPN和RPN的Trifecta和Pentafecta结果没有显著差异。RPN和LPN被认为是可行且安全的手术方法,可确保良好的功能效果。
{"title":"Comparison of Trifecta and Pentafecta Outcomes across 3 Surgical Modalities of Partial Nephrectomy (PN) - Open, Lap, and Robotic.","authors":"Hiranya Deka, N Mallikarjunarao Medam, Ginil Kumar P, Vishnu P, Manav Gideon, Achuth Ajith Kumar, Yensani Prashanth Reddy, Shivraj Barath Kumar","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.308","DOIUrl":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.308","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common solid tumor in the kidney (90%), accounting for about 3% of all cancers in adults. Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the surgical procedure primarily used for the treatment of localized kidney tumors. Two commonly used terms to describe the complexity and success of a partial nephrectomy procedure are \"trifecta\" and \"pentafecta.\" Trifecta is defined as Warm ischemia time (WIT) ≤ 25min or Cold ischemia time (CIT) ≤ 60min, Negative surgical margin (NSM), and no perioperative Clavien-Dindo complications (CDC) of Gr 3 or more [8], whereas pentafecta is defined as trifecta plus >90% preservation of e-Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and no increase in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage at 12-months post-operative period. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent partial nephrectomy at a single high-volume tertiary centre, from 2012 to 2020. We included patients who underwent partial nephrectomy by any of the three routes including open (OPN), laparoscopic (LPN), or robotic-assisted (RPN), and in which the follow-up data was available. We compared the trifecta and pentafecta outcomes across the three surgical modalities. We had a total of 183 patients in our study. Twenty-nine percent (53 patients) underwent open surgery, 12.6% (23 patients) underwent laparoscopic surgery and 58.5% (107) underwent robotic assisted surgery. The number of patients who fell under the low risk category in the RENAL scoring system were 70(38.3%), intermediate risk 79 (43.2%) and high risk 34 (18.6%). In the high risk RENAL score group, trifecta was achieved in 5 (50%) patients in OPN, 1(50%) in LPN and 7(31.8%) in RPN with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.581) whereas pentafecta was achieved in 3 (30%) patients in OPN, 1 (50%) in LPN and 7 (31.8%) in RPN with no statistically significant difference (0.855). In the overall cohort, mean WIT, mean hospital stay and mean EBL were higher in OPN as compared to LPN and RPN which was statistically significant (p < 0.001), whereas there was no statistical difference in mean operative time between the three modalities (p = 0.580). Renal tumors can be safely treated by RPN or LPN with lesser morbidity as compared to OPN. Trifecta and Pentafecta outcomes had no significant difference among OPN, LPN, and RPN. RPN and LPN may be considered feasible and safe surgical approaches ensuring good functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 3","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316447/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma with Solitary Diaphragmatic Metastasis in a Patient with von Hippel-Lindau Disease. 一名冯-希佩尔-林道氏病患者的临床 T1a 肾细胞癌伴有孤立的膈肌转移。
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.342
Tadataka Hirai, Mayu Uka, Toshihiro Iguchi, Kazuya Yasui, Takahiro Kawabata, Noriyuki Umakoshi, Koji Tomita, Yusuke Matsui, Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Motoo Araki, Takao Hiraki

We report the case of a 38-year-old man with two von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) (<2 cm in diameter) which developed into a 2.5-cm solitary diaphragmatic metastatic tumor. After diagnosis using percutaneous biopsy, the diaphragmatic metastasis and two RCCs were treated by laparoscopic resection and percutaneous cryoablation, respectively. One year after treatment, the patient survived without local recurrence or distant metastasis. This report describes a rare case of RCC metastasis in VHL disease and its treatment.

我们报告了一名 38 岁男性的病例,他患有两个与冯-希佩尔-林道病相关的 T1a 肾细胞癌(RCC)(见图 1)。
{"title":"Clinical T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma with Solitary Diaphragmatic Metastasis in a Patient with von Hippel-Lindau Disease.","authors":"Tadataka Hirai, Mayu Uka, Toshihiro Iguchi, Kazuya Yasui, Takahiro Kawabata, Noriyuki Umakoshi, Koji Tomita, Yusuke Matsui, Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Motoo Araki, Takao Hiraki","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.342","DOIUrl":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.342","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report the case of a 38-year-old man with two von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) (<2 cm in diameter) which developed into a 2.5-cm solitary diaphragmatic metastatic tumor. After diagnosis using percutaneous biopsy, the diaphragmatic metastasis and two RCCs were treated by laparoscopic resection and percutaneous cryoablation, respectively. One year after treatment, the patient survived without local recurrence or distant metastasis. This report describes a rare case of RCC metastasis in VHL disease and its treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 3","pages":"23-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299040/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical, Genomic, and Transcriptomic Characteristics of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Developed Thromboembolic Events. 发生血栓栓塞的转移性肾细胞癌患者的临床、基因组和转录组特征
IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.319
Gliceida Galarza Fortuna, Beverly Chigarira, Vinay Mathew Thomas, Kamal Kant Sahu, Shruti Adidam Kumar, Nishita Tripathi, Nicolas Sayegh, Neeraj Agarwal, Umang Swami, Benjamin L Maughan, Haoran Li

Thromboembolic events (TE) are a common complication in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes. However, the incidence of TE and clinical and genomic characteristics of patients with mRCC who develop this complication are poorly understood. Herein, we describe the incidence and clinical features of patients with mRCC with or without TE at our institution, and examine their association with the underlying genomic and transcriptomic characteristics of the tumor. This retrospective study included all consecutive cases of mRCC seen at our institution. A CLIA-certified lab performed tumor genomics and transcriptomics. Patients were classified based on the presence of a TE within the first year of diagnosis. Three hundred and seventy patients with mRCC were included in the study. TE was seen in 11% (42) of the patients. Patients with favorable International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk were less likely to develop a TE. In contrast, patients receiving combination treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor were more likely to develop a TE. No difference in overall survival among patients with or without TE was observed (52 vs. 55 months; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.5574-1.293, p = 0.24). The most upregulated pathways in mRCC with TEs versus those without were the xenobiotic metabolism and mTORC1 signaling pathways. Our findings suggest potential biomarkers that, after external validation, could be used to better select patients who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation.

血栓栓塞事件(TE)是转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者常见的并发症,与较差的临床预后有关。然而,人们对血栓栓塞事件的发生率以及出现这种并发症的 mRCC 患者的临床和基因组特征知之甚少。在此,我们描述了本院伴有或不伴有TE的mRCC患者的发病率和临床特征,并研究了它们与肿瘤的潜在基因组和转录组特征之间的关联。这项回顾性研究包括本院接诊的所有连续的 mRCC 病例。由 CLIA 认证实验室进行肿瘤基因组学和转录组学研究。根据确诊后第一年内出现 TE 的情况对患者进行分类。研究共纳入 370 名 mRCC 患者。11%的患者(42人)出现了TE。国际 mRCC 数据库联盟 (IMDC) 风险较高的患者不太可能出现 TE。相比之下,接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)和免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗的患者更容易出现TE。观察发现,有无TE的患者总生存期没有差异(52个月与55个月;HR 0.85,95% CI 0.5574-1.293,p = 0.24)。有TE的mRCC与无TE的mRCC相比,上调最多的通路是异生物代谢和mTORC1信号通路。我们的研究结果提出了一些潜在的生物标志物,经过外部验证后,可用于更好地选择从预防性抗凝治疗中获益的患者。
{"title":"Clinical, Genomic, and Transcriptomic Characteristics of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Developed Thromboembolic Events.","authors":"Gliceida Galarza Fortuna, Beverly Chigarira, Vinay Mathew Thomas, Kamal Kant Sahu, Shruti Adidam Kumar, Nishita Tripathi, Nicolas Sayegh, Neeraj Agarwal, Umang Swami, Benjamin L Maughan, Haoran Li","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.319","DOIUrl":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.319","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thromboembolic events (TE) are a common complication in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes. However, the incidence of TE and clinical and genomic characteristics of patients with mRCC who develop this complication are poorly understood. Herein, we describe the incidence and clinical features of patients with mRCC with or without TE at our institution, and examine their association with the underlying genomic and transcriptomic characteristics of the tumor. This retrospective study included all consecutive cases of mRCC seen at our institution. A CLIA-certified lab performed tumor genomics and transcriptomics. Patients were classified based on the presence of a TE within the first year of diagnosis. Three hundred and seventy patients with mRCC were included in the study. TE was seen in 11% (42) of the patients. Patients with favorable International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk were less likely to develop a TE. In contrast, patients receiving combination treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor were more likely to develop a TE. No difference in overall survival among patients with or without TE was observed (52 vs. 55 months; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.5574-1.293, p = 0.24). The most upregulated pathways in mRCC with TEs versus those without were the xenobiotic metabolism and mTORC1 signaling pathways. Our findings suggest potential biomarkers that, after external validation, could be used to better select patients who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":"11 3","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296887/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1