Compassionate communication: a scoping review

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION Frontiers in Communication Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.3389/fcomm.2023.1294586
Grace Jacob Julia, J. Romate, J. Allen, E. Rajkumar
{"title":"Compassionate communication: a scoping review","authors":"Grace Jacob Julia, J. Romate, J. Allen, E. Rajkumar","doi":"10.3389/fcomm.2023.1294586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical evidence from compassion literature reports the inherent difficulty in teaching compassion-related qualities and indicates the recent shift towards promoting interventions focusing on enhancing communication skills associated with compassionate care. Given the absence of a strong empirical and theoretical understanding of compassionate communication, the present scoping review identifies and integrates the definitions and theoretical approaches to compassionate communication based on the existing literature. A total of 5,813 records identified through an initial search in four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and APA PsycNet) combined with the 49 obtained through manual search, underwent screening based on PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A total of 57 articles that met the eligibility criteria were finalised for narrative synthesis (which included a thematic and content analysis). The review serves as a constructive critique of the contradictions and issues with empirical evidence on verbal and non-verbal compassion and portrays the concept to exist beyond its impact on the alleviation of suffering by describing compassionate communication in light of (1) cognitive aspects, (2) affective aspects, (3) behavioural/state aspects (4) relational aspects, (5) self-compassion, (6) mutuality, (7) individual-specific virtuous traits or values. The necessity for an integrative definition of compassionate communication and a theoretical framework that links the components of compassionate communication with its antecedents and outcomes is highlighted. The review is a valid and reliable source of guidance for future research on theory, education, and interventions on compassionate communication. The findings of the review can be interpreted in light of both contemporary and traditional communication theory, having practical implications for different domains of society (i.e., family, workplace relationships, business, and healthcare).","PeriodicalId":31739,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Communication","volume":"34 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1294586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empirical evidence from compassion literature reports the inherent difficulty in teaching compassion-related qualities and indicates the recent shift towards promoting interventions focusing on enhancing communication skills associated with compassionate care. Given the absence of a strong empirical and theoretical understanding of compassionate communication, the present scoping review identifies and integrates the definitions and theoretical approaches to compassionate communication based on the existing literature. A total of 5,813 records identified through an initial search in four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and APA PsycNet) combined with the 49 obtained through manual search, underwent screening based on PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A total of 57 articles that met the eligibility criteria were finalised for narrative synthesis (which included a thematic and content analysis). The review serves as a constructive critique of the contradictions and issues with empirical evidence on verbal and non-verbal compassion and portrays the concept to exist beyond its impact on the alleviation of suffering by describing compassionate communication in light of (1) cognitive aspects, (2) affective aspects, (3) behavioural/state aspects (4) relational aspects, (5) self-compassion, (6) mutuality, (7) individual-specific virtuous traits or values. The necessity for an integrative definition of compassionate communication and a theoretical framework that links the components of compassionate communication with its antecedents and outcomes is highlighted. The review is a valid and reliable source of guidance for future research on theory, education, and interventions on compassionate communication. The findings of the review can be interpreted in light of both contemporary and traditional communication theory, having practical implications for different domains of society (i.e., family, workplace relationships, business, and healthcare).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富有同情心的交流:范围界定审查
来自同情心文献的经验证据表明,教授与同情心相关的品质存在固有的困难,并表明最近的趋势是提倡干预措施,重点是提高与同情心关怀相关的沟通技能。鉴于对同情性沟通缺乏有力的实证和理论理解,本范围综述根据现有文献确定并整合了同情性沟通的定义和理论方法。通过对四个数据库(Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed 和 APA PsycNet)的初步搜索,共发现 5813 条记录,加上人工搜索获得的 49 条记录,根据 PRISMA-ScR 指南进行了筛选。最后确定了 57 篇符合资格标准的文章进行叙事综合(包括主题和内容分析)。本综述对语言和非语言同情的实证证据中存在的矛盾和问题进行了建设性的批判,并从以下几个方面描述了同情性交流:(1)认知方面;(2)情感方面;(3)行为/状态方面;(4)关系方面;(5)自我同情;(6)相互性;(7)个人特有的美德特征或价值观,从而描述了这一概念的存在超越了其对减轻痛苦的影响。综述强调,有必要对富有同情心的交流进行综合定义,并建立一个理论框架,将富有同情心的交流的各个组成部分与其前因后果联系起来。这篇综述为今后有关富有同情心的沟通的理论、教育和干预措施的研究提供了有效而可靠的指导。该综述的结论可根据当代和传统的沟通理论进行解释,对社会的不同领域(如家庭、工作场所关系、商业和医疗保健)具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
284
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Causal inference of diachronic semantic maps from cross-linguistic synchronic polysemy data I'd rather be a cyborg than a celebrity: Black feminism in the digital music industry Feminist HCI and narratives of design semantics in DIY music hardware Designing understandable, action-oriented, and well-perceived earthquake risk maps—The Swiss case study Topic modeling three decades of climate change news in Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1