Scaling factors for 1-D ground response amplification in a soft soil basin

Dedi Apriadi, Anggariano Mandhany, A. Sahadewa, Y. I. Basarah, W. Sengara, Abi Maulana Hakim
{"title":"Scaling factors for 1-D ground response amplification in a soft soil basin","authors":"Dedi Apriadi, Anggariano Mandhany, A. Sahadewa, Y. I. Basarah, W. Sengara, Abi Maulana Hakim","doi":"10.3389/fbuil.2023.1275425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Basin presence is believed to affect the ground surface response due to earthquakes, particularly in areas around the basin edge. Previous studies showed that 1-D and 2-D wave propagation analyses resulted in significant differences in amplification at the basin edge. However, the link between 1-D and 2-D responses has not been studied for engineering practices. In practical application, seismic studies were commonly performed using 1-D analysis, for example, to develop a city micro-zonation map. Based on practical considerations, it is necessary to estimate the scaling factor for the 1-D analysis by considering the basin presence, particularly for one containing soft soil. There are three stages carried out in this study. The first stage: collecting data on some basin geometries for the 2-D modeling references and then defining selected site class and input motions. The second stage: modeling 1-D and 2-D wave propagation using D-MOD and Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (FLAC), respectively. The third stage: comparing spectral acceleration resulting from the 1-D and 2-D analyses to obtain the scaling factors. This research studied and reported the relationship between PGA values varied as 0.2 g, 0.3 g, 0.4 g, and 0.5 g, basin geometry (e.g., the angle was set to 5°, 10°, 15°, 30°, and 45°, with depth and width variations of 0.0125, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4, while the basin width was adjusted to 500 m, 1 km, 2 km, and 4 km), and the spectral acceleration in several observation points on the ground surface. Based on this evaluation, a series of scaling factors are proposed. These factors can be used for spectral acceleration from available hazard maps, commonly developed based on 1-D analysis. The application example of this scaling factor is presented in this study, using the Bandung Basin case.","PeriodicalId":505606,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Built Environment","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1275425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Basin presence is believed to affect the ground surface response due to earthquakes, particularly in areas around the basin edge. Previous studies showed that 1-D and 2-D wave propagation analyses resulted in significant differences in amplification at the basin edge. However, the link between 1-D and 2-D responses has not been studied for engineering practices. In practical application, seismic studies were commonly performed using 1-D analysis, for example, to develop a city micro-zonation map. Based on practical considerations, it is necessary to estimate the scaling factor for the 1-D analysis by considering the basin presence, particularly for one containing soft soil. There are three stages carried out in this study. The first stage: collecting data on some basin geometries for the 2-D modeling references and then defining selected site class and input motions. The second stage: modeling 1-D and 2-D wave propagation using D-MOD and Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (FLAC), respectively. The third stage: comparing spectral acceleration resulting from the 1-D and 2-D analyses to obtain the scaling factors. This research studied and reported the relationship between PGA values varied as 0.2 g, 0.3 g, 0.4 g, and 0.5 g, basin geometry (e.g., the angle was set to 5°, 10°, 15°, 30°, and 45°, with depth and width variations of 0.0125, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4, while the basin width was adjusted to 500 m, 1 km, 2 km, and 4 km), and the spectral acceleration in several observation points on the ground surface. Based on this evaluation, a series of scaling factors are proposed. These factors can be used for spectral acceleration from available hazard maps, commonly developed based on 1-D analysis. The application example of this scaling factor is presented in this study, using the Bandung Basin case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软土盆地中 1-D 地面响应放大的比例因子
盆地的存在被认为会影响地震引起的地表反应,尤其是在盆地边缘地区。先前的研究表明,1-D 和 2-D 波传播分析导致盆地边缘的放大效应存在显著差异。然而,在工程实践中还没有研究过 1-D 和 2-D 反应之间的联系。在实际应用中,地震研究通常采用一维分析,例如绘制城市微区图。基于实际考虑,有必要通过考虑盆地的存在来估算一维分析的比例因子,特别是对于含有软土的盆地。本研究分为三个阶段。第一阶段:收集一些盆地的几何数据,作为二维建模的参考,然后确定选定的场地类别和输入运动。第二阶段:分别使用 D-MOD 和快速拉格朗日连续体分析法(FLAC)建立一维和二维波传播模型。第三阶段:比较一维和二维分析得出的频谱加速度,以获得缩放因子。这项研究研究并报告了 PGA 值变化为 0.2 g、0.3 g、0.4 g 和 0.5 g 与盆地几何形状(例如,角度设置为 5°、0.4 g 和 0.5 g)之间的关系、角设置为 5°、10°、15°、30° 和 45°,深度和宽度变化为 0.0125、0.025、0.05、0.075、0.1、0.2 和 0.4,盆地宽度调整为 500 米、1 公里、2 公里和 4 公里)与地表多个观测点的频谱加速度之间的关系。在此评估基础上,提出了一系列缩放因子。这些因子可用于现有危险地图中的频谱加速度,这些地图通常是基于一维分析绘制的。本研究以万隆盆地为例,介绍了该缩放因子的应用实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Asset maintenance in Australian commercial buildings Social norms and perceptions of Saudis on active transportation Recent advances in stability analysis and design of 3D slopes Geospatial modeling of optimal zones for sustainable urbanization in southwestern NEOM, Saudi Arabia using geomatics techniques Efficient bridge steel bearing health monitoring using laser displacement sensors and wireless accelerometers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1