The impact of investment treaties on domestic governance in developing countries

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law & Policy Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1111/lapo.12234
Jonathan Bonnitcha, Zoe Phillips Williams
{"title":"The impact of investment treaties on domestic governance in developing countries","authors":"Jonathan Bonnitcha,&nbsp;Zoe Phillips Williams","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper empirically examines the impact of investment treaties on domestic governance in developing countries, through cross-country quantitative analysis and a detailed qualitative case-study on Myanmar. We clarify a variety of mechanisms that plausibly link investment treaties to impacts on domestic governance. Considering incentive, acculturative and political economy mechanisms, we find little evidence that the treaties lead to changes in domestic law, institutional structure or policy-making. The treaties also have surprisingly limited relevance in investor-state bargaining outside formal adjudicatory processes. Overall, our findings point to a profound decoupling between investment treaties and domestic governance; they also clarify the conditions under which such decoupling can persist, notwithstanding material incentives for states to ensure tighter alignment. Rather than interpreting decoupling as a failure of domestic implementation, our case study suggests that the problem is with the treaties themselves, in that they place obligations on developing countries that cannot realistically be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"46 2","pages":"140-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lapo.12234","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper empirically examines the impact of investment treaties on domestic governance in developing countries, through cross-country quantitative analysis and a detailed qualitative case-study on Myanmar. We clarify a variety of mechanisms that plausibly link investment treaties to impacts on domestic governance. Considering incentive, acculturative and political economy mechanisms, we find little evidence that the treaties lead to changes in domestic law, institutional structure or policy-making. The treaties also have surprisingly limited relevance in investor-state bargaining outside formal adjudicatory processes. Overall, our findings point to a profound decoupling between investment treaties and domestic governance; they also clarify the conditions under which such decoupling can persist, notwithstanding material incentives for states to ensure tighter alignment. Rather than interpreting decoupling as a failure of domestic implementation, our case study suggests that the problem is with the treaties themselves, in that they place obligations on developing countries that cannot realistically be implemented.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资条约对发展中国家国内治理的影响
本文通过跨国定量分析和对缅甸的详细定性案例研究,对投资条约对发展中国家国内治理的影响进行了实证研究。我们阐明了将投资条约与对国内治理的影响合理联系起来的各种机制。考虑到激励机制、文化适应机制和政治经济学机制,我们发现几乎没有证据表明条约会导致国内法律、制度结构或政策制定发生变化。在正式裁决程序之外,条约与投资者-国家谈判的相关性也出奇地有限。总之,我们的研究结果表明,投资条约与国内治理之间存在着严重的脱钩现象;这些研究结果还阐明了在何种条件下这种脱钩现象会持续存在,尽管国家有确保更紧密协调的物质激励。我们的案例研究并没有将脱钩解释为国内执行的失败,而是表明问题出在条约本身,因为条约为发展中国家规定了无法切实履行的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
期刊最新文献
Win, Lose, or Draw: Using LGBTQ+ Legal History to Reassess Social Movement Outcomes Issue Information Courts and Social Participation in Latin America: The Use of Public Hearings and Amici Curiae Human Dignity on Trial: Welfare Judges, Immigration Politics and Social Change The Client Is the Cause: Motivation, Activism, and Cause Lawyering Among Immigration Attorneys in the Trump Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1