Learning From International Comparators of National Medical Imaging Initiatives for AI Development: Multiphase Qualitative Study

JMIR AI Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.2196/51168
K. Karpathakis, E. Pencheon, D. Cushnan
{"title":"Learning From International Comparators of National Medical Imaging Initiatives for AI Development: Multiphase Qualitative Study","authors":"K. Karpathakis, E. Pencheon, D. Cushnan","doi":"10.2196/51168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The COVID-19 pandemic drove investment and research into medical imaging platforms to provide data to create artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for the management of patients with COVID-19. Building on the success of England’s National COVID-19 Chest Imaging Database, the national digital policy body (NHSX) sought to create a generalized national medical imaging platform for the development, validation, and deployment of algorithms.\n \n \n \n This study aims to understand international use cases of medical imaging platforms for the development and implementation of algorithms to inform the creation of England’s national imaging platform.\n \n \n \n The National Health Service (NHS) AI Lab Policy and Strategy Team adopted a multiphased approach: (1) identification and prioritization of national AI imaging platforms; (2) Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental (PESTLE) factor analysis deep dive into national AI imaging platforms; (3) semistructured interviews with key stakeholders; (4) workshop on emerging themes and insights with the internal NHSX team; and (5) formulation of policy recommendations.\n \n \n \n International use cases of national AI imaging platforms (n=7) were prioritized for PESTLE factor analysis. Stakeholders (n=13) from the international use cases were interviewed. Themes (n=8) from the semistructured interviews, including interview quotes, were analyzed with workshop participants (n=5). The outputs of the deep dives, interviews, and workshop were synthesized thematically into 8 categories with 17 subcategories. On the basis of the insights from the international use cases, policy recommendations (n=12) were developed to support the NHS AI Lab in the design and development of the English national medical imaging platform.\n \n \n \n The creation of AI algorithms supporting technology and infrastructure such as platforms often occurs in isolation within countries, let alone between countries. This novel policy research project sought to bridge the gap by learning from the challenges, successes, and experience of England’s international counterparts. Policy recommendations based on international learnings focused on the demonstrable benefits of the platform to secure sustainable funding, validation of algorithms and infrastructure to support in situ deployment, and creating wraparound tools for nontechnical participants such as clinicians to engage with algorithm creation. As health care organizations increasingly adopt technological solutions, policy makers have a responsibility to ensure that initiatives are informed by learnings from both national and international initiatives as well as disseminating the outcomes of their work.\n","PeriodicalId":73551,"journal":{"name":"JMIR AI","volume":"70 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/51168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic drove investment and research into medical imaging platforms to provide data to create artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for the management of patients with COVID-19. Building on the success of England’s National COVID-19 Chest Imaging Database, the national digital policy body (NHSX) sought to create a generalized national medical imaging platform for the development, validation, and deployment of algorithms. This study aims to understand international use cases of medical imaging platforms for the development and implementation of algorithms to inform the creation of England’s national imaging platform. The National Health Service (NHS) AI Lab Policy and Strategy Team adopted a multiphased approach: (1) identification and prioritization of national AI imaging platforms; (2) Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental (PESTLE) factor analysis deep dive into national AI imaging platforms; (3) semistructured interviews with key stakeholders; (4) workshop on emerging themes and insights with the internal NHSX team; and (5) formulation of policy recommendations. International use cases of national AI imaging platforms (n=7) were prioritized for PESTLE factor analysis. Stakeholders (n=13) from the international use cases were interviewed. Themes (n=8) from the semistructured interviews, including interview quotes, were analyzed with workshop participants (n=5). The outputs of the deep dives, interviews, and workshop were synthesized thematically into 8 categories with 17 subcategories. On the basis of the insights from the international use cases, policy recommendations (n=12) were developed to support the NHS AI Lab in the design and development of the English national medical imaging platform. The creation of AI algorithms supporting technology and infrastructure such as platforms often occurs in isolation within countries, let alone between countries. This novel policy research project sought to bridge the gap by learning from the challenges, successes, and experience of England’s international counterparts. Policy recommendations based on international learnings focused on the demonstrable benefits of the platform to secure sustainable funding, validation of algorithms and infrastructure to support in situ deployment, and creating wraparound tools for nontechnical participants such as clinicians to engage with algorithm creation. As health care organizations increasingly adopt technological solutions, policy makers have a responsibility to ensure that initiatives are informed by learnings from both national and international initiatives as well as disseminating the outcomes of their work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向国家医学影像计划的国际比较者学习,促进人工智能发展:多阶段定性研究
COVID-19 大流行推动了对医学影像平台的投资和研究,以提供数据创建人工智能 (AI) 算法,管理 COVID-19 患者。在英格兰国家 COVID-19 胸部成像数据库取得成功的基础上,国家数字政策机构(NHSX)试图创建一个通用的国家医学成像平台,用于开发、验证和部署算法。 本研究旨在了解医疗成像平台在开发和实施算法方面的国际用例,为创建英格兰国家成像平台提供参考。 国家卫生服务(NHS)人工智能实验室政策和战略团队采用了一种多阶段方法:(1)确定国家人工智能成像平台并排定优先顺序;(2)对国家人工智能成像平台进行政治、经济、社会、技术、法律和环境(PESTLE)因素分析深度挖掘;(3)对主要利益相关者进行半结构化访谈;(4)与 NHSX 内部团队就新出现的主题和见解进行研讨;以及(5)制定政策建议。 国家人工智能成像平台的国际用例(n=7)被优先用于 PESTLE 因子分析。对国际使用案例中的利益相关者(n=13)进行了访谈。与研讨会与会者(5 人)一起分析了半结构式访谈中的主题(8 个),包括访谈引语。深入研究、访谈和研讨会的成果按主题归纳为 8 个类别和 17 个子类别。根据从国际使用案例中获得的启示,制定了政策建议(n=12),以支持英国国家医疗服务系统人工智能实验室设计和开发英国国家医学影像平台。 支持平台等技术和基础设施的人工智能算法的创建往往是在国家内部孤立进行的,更不用说国家之间了。这项新颖的政策研究项目试图通过学习英格兰所面临的挑战、取得的成功以及国际同行的经验来弥补这一差距。根据国际经验提出的政策建议侧重于平台的可证明效益,以确保可持续的资金、算法和基础设施的验证以支持现场部署,以及为临床医生等非技术参与者创建参与算法创建的配套工具。随着医疗机构越来越多地采用技术解决方案,政策制定者有责任确保从国家和国际倡议中吸取经验教训,并传播其工作成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancing Privacy-Preserving Health Care Analytics and Implementation of the Personal Health Train: Federated Deep Learning Study. Urgency Prediction for Medical Laboratory Tests Through Optimal Sparse Decision Tree: Case Study With Echocardiograms. Identification of Use Cases, Target Groups, and Motivations Around Adopting Smart Speakers for Health Care and Social Care Settings: Scoping Review. Evaluating ChatGPT's Efficacy in Pediatric Pneumonia Detection From Chest X-Rays: Comparative Analysis of Specialized AI Models. Enhancing Interpretable, Transparent, and Unobtrusive Detection of Acute Marijuana Intoxication in Natural Environments: Harnessing Smart Devices and Explainable AI to Empower Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions: Longitudinal Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1