The Determinants of Dietary Diversity among Women of Reproductive Age in the Kolda Region in 2020

A. Tall, Agnès Kamoye Yade, N. M. Sougou, Anta Agne, A. Ndiaye, Ousseynou Ka
{"title":"The Determinants of Dietary Diversity among Women of Reproductive Age in the Kolda Region in 2020","authors":"A. Tall, Agnès Kamoye Yade, N. M. Sougou, Anta Agne, A. Ndiaye, Ousseynou Ka","doi":"10.5539/gjhs.v16n2p16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The lack of dietary diversity among women of reproductive age (WRA) is a public health problem in Senegal, particularly in the southern regions. The good nutritional status of women is one of the factors in the fight against maternal mortality and thus promotes a healthy pregnancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of dietary diversity among WRA in the Kolda region. \n \nMETHODS: The quantitative, descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study took place in January-February 2020 in the Kolda region. It covered 1231 women of reproductive age (15- 49 years) in the Kolda region. Data were collected at household level using a questionnaire administered after informed consent. Ordinal logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with dietary diversity among WRA in the Kolda region. \n \nRESULTS: A total of 1,231 WRA were surveyed, of whom 59.5% were neither pregnant nor breastfeeding, 30.7% breastfeeding and 9.8% pregnant. The mean age of the women was 27.62 years, with a standard deviation of 7.2 years. The median age was 27. Most women surveyed lived in rural areas (72.1%) and 58.5% were uneducated. Taking classification into account, 44% of WRAs in the Kolda region had average dietary diversity, compared with 24.7% who had low diversity and 31.3% who had high diversity. \n \nRisk factors associated with dietary diversity in WRA after adjustment were living in an urban environment (OR=1.52 [1.29 ; 1.78]), breastfeeding (OR=1.43 [1.13 ; 1.82]), head of household with higher level of education (OR=2.59 [1.55 ; 4.41]), household income greater than or equal to minimum wage (OR=1.23 [1.04 ; 1.45]), existence of fruit trees in the household (OR=1.28 [1.06 ; 1.55]), the existence of funding or support for processing local produce (OR=1.56 [1.10 ; 2.22]), knowledge of micronutrient-rich foods (OR=1.39 [1.13 ; 1.71]), good level of knowledge of good nutritional practices (OR=1.61 [1.35 ; 1.92]), women's average level of information on good hygiene and care practices (OR=1.27 [1.08 ; 1.48 ]). \n \nCONCLUSION: the accessibility and availability of nutrient-rich foods, the level of education of the head of household, the household's standard of living, awareness-raising, access to financing and the empowerment of women all help to improve the dietary diversity of WRA. Consequently, in the fight against food insecurity and malnutrition, the synergy of actions across sectors such as health, agriculture, the economy and social development, in particular gender and women's empowerment, is paramount for good women's nutritional status.","PeriodicalId":101408,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of health science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of health science","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v16n2p16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The lack of dietary diversity among women of reproductive age (WRA) is a public health problem in Senegal, particularly in the southern regions. The good nutritional status of women is one of the factors in the fight against maternal mortality and thus promotes a healthy pregnancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of dietary diversity among WRA in the Kolda region. METHODS: The quantitative, descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study took place in January-February 2020 in the Kolda region. It covered 1231 women of reproductive age (15- 49 years) in the Kolda region. Data were collected at household level using a questionnaire administered after informed consent. Ordinal logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with dietary diversity among WRA in the Kolda region. RESULTS: A total of 1,231 WRA were surveyed, of whom 59.5% were neither pregnant nor breastfeeding, 30.7% breastfeeding and 9.8% pregnant. The mean age of the women was 27.62 years, with a standard deviation of 7.2 years. The median age was 27. Most women surveyed lived in rural areas (72.1%) and 58.5% were uneducated. Taking classification into account, 44% of WRAs in the Kolda region had average dietary diversity, compared with 24.7% who had low diversity and 31.3% who had high diversity. Risk factors associated with dietary diversity in WRA after adjustment were living in an urban environment (OR=1.52 [1.29 ; 1.78]), breastfeeding (OR=1.43 [1.13 ; 1.82]), head of household with higher level of education (OR=2.59 [1.55 ; 4.41]), household income greater than or equal to minimum wage (OR=1.23 [1.04 ; 1.45]), existence of fruit trees in the household (OR=1.28 [1.06 ; 1.55]), the existence of funding or support for processing local produce (OR=1.56 [1.10 ; 2.22]), knowledge of micronutrient-rich foods (OR=1.39 [1.13 ; 1.71]), good level of knowledge of good nutritional practices (OR=1.61 [1.35 ; 1.92]), women's average level of information on good hygiene and care practices (OR=1.27 [1.08 ; 1.48 ]). CONCLUSION: the accessibility and availability of nutrient-rich foods, the level of education of the head of household, the household's standard of living, awareness-raising, access to financing and the empowerment of women all help to improve the dietary diversity of WRA. Consequently, in the fight against food insecurity and malnutrition, the synergy of actions across sectors such as health, agriculture, the economy and social development, in particular gender and women's empowerment, is paramount for good women's nutritional status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020 年科尔达地区育龄妇女膳食多样性的决定因素
导言:育龄妇女(WRA)缺乏饮食多样性是塞内加尔,尤其是南部地区的一个公共卫生问题。妇女良好的营养状况是降低孕产妇死亡率的因素之一,从而促进健康怀孕。本研究旨在调查科尔达地区 WRA 饮食多样性的决定因素。 方法:这项定量、描述性和分析性横断面研究于 2020 年 1 月至 2 月在科尔达地区进行。研究覆盖了科尔达地区的 1231 名育龄妇女(15-49 岁)。在获得知情同意后,通过问卷调查收集家庭层面的数据。采用正序逻辑回归法确定与科尔达地区 WRA 饮食多样性相关的因素。 结果:共调查了 1,231 名 WRA,其中 59.5% 既未怀孕也未哺乳,30.7% 正在哺乳,9.8% 已怀孕。妇女的平均年龄为 27.62 岁,标准差为 7.2 岁。年龄中位数为 27 岁。大多数受访妇女生活在农村地区(72.1%),58.5%未受过教育。考虑到分类因素,科尔达地区 44% 的 WRAs 膳食多样性一般,而 24.7% 的 WRAs 膳食多样性较低,31.3% 的 WRAs 膳食多样性较高。 经调整后,与 WRA 饮食多样性相关的风险因素有:居住在城市环境中(OR=1.52 [1.29 ; 1.78])、母乳喂养(OR=1.43 [1.13 ; 1.82])、户主受教育程度较高(OR=2.59 [1.55 ; 4.41])、家庭收入高于或等于最低工资(OR=1.23 [1.04 ; 1.45])、家中有果树(OR=1.28 [1.06 ; 1.55])、当地农产品加工是否得到资助或支持(OR=1.56 [1.10 ; 2.22])、对富含微量营养素食品的了解程度(OR=1.39 [1.13 ; 1.71])、对良好营养做法的良好了解程度(OR=1.61 [1.35 ; 1.92])、妇女对良好卫生和护理做法的平均了解程度(OR=1.27 [1.08 ; 1.48 ])。 结论:营养丰富的食物的可获得性和可利用性、户主的教育水平、家庭生活水平、提高认识、获得资金和妇女赋权都有助于改善妇女儿童营养不良症患者的膳食多样性。因此,在消除粮食不安全和营养不良的斗争中,卫生、农业、经济和社会发展等各部门的协同行动,特别是性别平等和妇女赋权,对于改善妇女的营养状况至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgements for Global Journal of Health Science, Vol. 16, No. 4 Prevalence of Diabetes and the Relationship Between Wealth and Social Demographic Characteristics Across 6 Low-and-Middle Income Countries Singing Habit Potentially Prevents the Oral Frailty of Japanese Healthy Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Children among Adults attending Selected Health Facilities in Kinondoni Municipality; Dar es salaam, Tanzania: A Cross Sectional Study Profiles of Community Care Sites and provider Community Health Workers: A Case study at Gombe Matadi, Kenge and Kisantu Rural Health Zones in the Democratic Republic of Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1