The Politics of State-level COVID-19 Responses in India: Evidence from the First Wave in 2020

Ritika Jain, Tirtha Chatterjee
{"title":"The Politics of State-level COVID-19 Responses in India: Evidence from the First Wave in 2020","authors":"Ritika Jain, Tirtha Chatterjee","doi":"10.1177/00194662231212753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine if policy interventions to curb the spread of COVID-19 were driven by political factors. We focus on the period between 1 June and 31 August 2020 when lockdowns and testing were the only responses available with governments and policymakers across the world. These instruments are costly. Stringent lockdowns post challenges to livelihoods while only testing without any lockdown accentuates health risks. This choice between life and livelihood becomes all the more pertinent in a developing country like India. We find that state governments in India that had upcoming elections, faced close margin victory in the last election, were non-incumbents and were aligned with the party at the centre adhered to aggressive testing as a strategy and did not impose strict lockdowns to avert losses in economic activity. Such policy responses indicate an attempt to avert possible losses in future elections. These findings confirm the strong role of political factors in policy decisions. JEL Codes: P52, P16, P36","PeriodicalId":509033,"journal":{"name":"The Indian Economic Journal","volume":"28 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662231212753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine if policy interventions to curb the spread of COVID-19 were driven by political factors. We focus on the period between 1 June and 31 August 2020 when lockdowns and testing were the only responses available with governments and policymakers across the world. These instruments are costly. Stringent lockdowns post challenges to livelihoods while only testing without any lockdown accentuates health risks. This choice between life and livelihood becomes all the more pertinent in a developing country like India. We find that state governments in India that had upcoming elections, faced close margin victory in the last election, were non-incumbents and were aligned with the party at the centre adhered to aggressive testing as a strategy and did not impose strict lockdowns to avert losses in economic activity. Such policy responses indicate an attempt to avert possible losses in future elections. These findings confirm the strong role of political factors in policy decisions. JEL Codes: P52, P16, P36
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度邦级 COVID-19 反应的政治性:来自 2020 年第一波的证据
我们研究了遏制 COVID-19 传播的政策干预是否受到政治因素的驱动。我们将重点放在 2020 年 6 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日期间,当时封锁和检测是世界各国政府和决策者唯一可用的应对措施。这些手段代价高昂。严格的封锁给生计带来挑战,而只检测而不封锁则会加剧健康风险。在印度这样的发展中国家,生命与生计之间的选择变得更加重要。我们发现,即将举行选举、在上次选举中险胜、非现任政府、与中央政党保持一致的印度各邦政府,都将积极检测作为一种策略,而没有实行严格的封锁,以避免经济活动的损失。这种政策反应表明,他们试图避免未来选举中可能出现的损失。这些发现证实了政治因素在政策决策中的重要作用。JEL Codes:P52, P16, P36
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICT Diffusion, Trade Openness and Growth: Empirical Evidence from Asian Countries Making Global Pharma Supply Chain Resilient: Will the PLI Scheme of India make it a Reliable Alternative to China for the Supply of APIs? Technology Intensification and 
Farmers’ Welfare: A Case 
Study from Karnataka, 
a Semi-arid State of India International Remittances and Household Expenditure Patterns in Bangladesh Political Economy of Fertiliser Use in Agriculture: A Study of Two Districts of West Bengal*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1