Ibn ‘Arabī on Divine Atemporality and Temporal Presentism

Ismail Lala
{"title":"Ibn ‘Arabī on Divine Atemporality and Temporal Presentism","authors":"Ismail Lala","doi":"10.14428/thl.v8i1.69673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muḥyī al-Dīn ibn ‘Arabī (d. 638/1240) is arguably the most influential philosophical mystic in Islam. He is also a presentist. This paper responds to the arguments of contemporary philosophers, Norman Kretzmann, William Lane Craig, Garrett DeWeese, and Alan Padgett, who argue that divine atemporality and temporal presentism are incompatible, through the temporal ontology of Ibn ‘Arabī. Ibn ‘Arabī asserts that all entities in the universe are loci of manifestation of God’s most beautiful Names. These divine Names constitute sensible reality. The principal response of Ibn ‘Arabī to the arguments of contemporary scholars is that the divine Names as they are manifested in the cosmos cannot be conflated with the divine Names as they are in themselves, which, in turn, cannot be conflated with God in His numinous essence. This allows him to simultaneously maintain the atemporality of God and temporal presentism.","PeriodicalId":507361,"journal":{"name":"TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v8i1.69673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Muḥyī al-Dīn ibn ‘Arabī (d. 638/1240) is arguably the most influential philosophical mystic in Islam. He is also a presentist. This paper responds to the arguments of contemporary philosophers, Norman Kretzmann, William Lane Craig, Garrett DeWeese, and Alan Padgett, who argue that divine atemporality and temporal presentism are incompatible, through the temporal ontology of Ibn ‘Arabī. Ibn ‘Arabī asserts that all entities in the universe are loci of manifestation of God’s most beautiful Names. These divine Names constitute sensible reality. The principal response of Ibn ‘Arabī to the arguments of contemporary scholars is that the divine Names as they are manifested in the cosmos cannot be conflated with the divine Names as they are in themselves, which, in turn, cannot be conflated with God in His numinous essence. This allows him to simultaneously maintain the atemporality of God and temporal presentism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊本-阿拉比论神的时空性与时空现时论
穆赫伊-丁-伊本-阿拉比(Muḥyī al-Dīn ibn 'Arabī,卒于 638/1240 年)可以说是伊斯兰教最有影响力的神秘主义哲学家。他也是一位现世主义者。当代哲学家诺曼-克雷兹曼(Norman Kretzmann)、威廉-莱恩-克雷格(William Lane Craig)、加勒特-德韦斯(Garrett DeWeese)和艾伦-帕吉特(Alan Padgett)认为神的无时间性与时间现时论是不相容的,本文通过伊本-阿拉比的时间本体论对这些论点做出了回应。伊本-阿拉比断言,宇宙中的所有实体都是上帝最美之名的显现之地。这些神名构成了可感的现实。伊本-阿拉比对当代学者论点的主要回应是,在宇宙中显现的神名不能与神名本身混为一谈,而神名本身又不能与神的本体混为一谈。这使他能够同时坚持上帝的无时间性和时间的当下主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism The Love Argument for the Trinity Timelessness à la Leftow Defeating the Problem of Evil with Evil Defeating the Problem of Evil with Evil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1