Anthony J. Marois MD, Tyler J. Brolin MD, David L. Bernholt MD, Frederick M. Azar MD, Thomas W. Throckmorton MD
{"title":"Teres minor deficiency does not predict clinically inferior external rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a 2-year matched cohort study","authors":"Anthony J. Marois MD, Tyler J. Brolin MD, David L. Bernholt MD, Frederick M. Azar MD, Thomas W. Throckmorton MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2023.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Current teaching maintains that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is unlikely to restore external rotation (ER) without a functional posterior </span>rotator cuff, specifically the teres minor (TM). This study compared restoration of ER in TM-deficient (TMD) with TM-intact (TMI) shoulders after RTSA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>All patients who underwent lateralized RTSA using an onlay prosthesis with no adjunct tendon transfers between January 2014 and July 2020 and with 2-year follow-up were identified. Preoperative imaging review identified patients with TMD, and </span>propensity score matching was used to create a control group of equal size. TMD was divided into three subgroups: 1) atrophy; 2) fracture/malunion/nonunion (proximal humerus); and 3) endoprosthesis. Primary outcome measures were active ER range of motion (ROM) measured at the side, ΔER ROM from baseline, ER strength, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subscore question, “can you reach back of head.”</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-nine patients with TMD shoulders (atrophy: n = 15; fracture n = 14; endoprosthesis: n = 10) were matched with 39 patients with TMI shoulders. Although TMD was associated with reduced baseline ER ROM (13.6 vs. 28.8; <em>P</em> = .004), the TMD group achieved greater ΔER ROM 2 years after RTSA (24.6 vs. 10.3; <em>P</em> = .014) and demonstrated comparable 2-year ER ROM (38.6 vs. 40.7; <em>P</em> = .484). The TMD group had a higher rate of ER weakness (12% vs. 0%; <em>P</em> = .044) but no difference in ability to reach back of head (unable: 24% vs. 20%; <em>P</em> = .686) or patient-reported functional scores (2-year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons: 76.2 vs. 74.8; <em>P</em> = .793).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study suggests that patients with an insufficient or absent teres minor can achieve satisfactory ER ROM and function after lateralized RTSA similar to their TMI peers. Future study will seek to identify muscle activation patterns of the shoulder girdle that allow TMD patients to overcome this insufficiency to perform activities requiring ER.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 297-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452723001748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Current teaching maintains that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is unlikely to restore external rotation (ER) without a functional posterior rotator cuff, specifically the teres minor (TM). This study compared restoration of ER in TM-deficient (TMD) with TM-intact (TMI) shoulders after RTSA.
Methods
All patients who underwent lateralized RTSA using an onlay prosthesis with no adjunct tendon transfers between January 2014 and July 2020 and with 2-year follow-up were identified. Preoperative imaging review identified patients with TMD, and propensity score matching was used to create a control group of equal size. TMD was divided into three subgroups: 1) atrophy; 2) fracture/malunion/nonunion (proximal humerus); and 3) endoprosthesis. Primary outcome measures were active ER range of motion (ROM) measured at the side, ΔER ROM from baseline, ER strength, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subscore question, “can you reach back of head.”
Results
Thirty-nine patients with TMD shoulders (atrophy: n = 15; fracture n = 14; endoprosthesis: n = 10) were matched with 39 patients with TMI shoulders. Although TMD was associated with reduced baseline ER ROM (13.6 vs. 28.8; P = .004), the TMD group achieved greater ΔER ROM 2 years after RTSA (24.6 vs. 10.3; P = .014) and demonstrated comparable 2-year ER ROM (38.6 vs. 40.7; P = .484). The TMD group had a higher rate of ER weakness (12% vs. 0%; P = .044) but no difference in ability to reach back of head (unable: 24% vs. 20%; P = .686) or patient-reported functional scores (2-year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons: 76.2 vs. 74.8; P = .793).
Conclusion
This study suggests that patients with an insufficient or absent teres minor can achieve satisfactory ER ROM and function after lateralized RTSA similar to their TMI peers. Future study will seek to identify muscle activation patterns of the shoulder girdle that allow TMD patients to overcome this insufficiency to perform activities requiring ER.
背景目前的观点认为,如果没有功能性后肩袖,特别是小圆肌(TM),反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)不太可能恢复外旋(ER)。本研究比较了TM缺损(TMD)和TM完好(TMI)肩关节在RTSA术后的外旋恢复情况。方法确定了所有在2014年1月至2020年7月期间接受了侧位RTSA术的患者,这些患者使用了无辅助肌腱转移的嵌体假体,并随访了2年。术前影像学检查确定了 TMD 患者,并采用倾向评分匹配法创建了同等规模的对照组。TMD分为三个亚组:1)萎缩;2)骨折/粉碎性骨折/未愈合(肱骨近端);3)假体内固定。主要结果测量指标包括侧位测量的主动ER活动范围(ROM)、基线ΔER ROM、ER力量和美国肩肘外科医生子评分问题 "您能否触及后脑勺"。结果39名TMD肩关节患者(萎缩:n = 15;骨折:n = 14;假体内固定:n = 10)与39名TMI肩关节患者进行了配对。虽然 TMD 与基线 ER ROM 减少有关(13.6 vs. 28.8;P = .004),但 TMD 组在 RTSA 2 年后获得了更大的ΔER ROM(24.6 vs. 10.3;P = .014),且 2 年 ER ROM 显示相当(38.6 vs. 40.7;P = .484)。TMD组的ER乏力率较高(12% vs. 0%;P = .044),但在触及后脑勺的能力(无法:24% vs. 20%;P = .686)或患者报告的功能评分(2年美国肩肘外科医生:76.2 vs. 74.8;P = .793)方面没有差异。未来的研究将寻求确定肩腰部肌肉激活模式,使 TMD 患者能够克服这种不足,从事需要 ER 的活动。
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.