首页 > 最新文献

Seminars in Arthroplasty最新文献

英文 中文
Thank you to our reviewers for 2024
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2025.01.001
{"title":"Thank you to our reviewers for 2024","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2025.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"35 1","pages":"Pages 116-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143284736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is increasing! An analysis of publication frequency and Google Trends
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.10.002
Catherine M. Call BA , Joseph B. Kahan MD

Background

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedure volume is increasing, as is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) procedure volume, which continues to make up a larger proportion of all TSA procedures performed. Whether growing procedure volume is associated with growing patient interest has not yet been assessed with the field of shoulder arthroplasty. The present study aimed to evaluate trends in public and scientific interest in RTSA compared to TSA by assessing Google Trends and publication frequency data, respectively.

Methods

Google Trends data and publication frequency data on PubMed were collected for RTSA and TSA between January 2010 and December 2023. Trend analyses were performed.

Results

Over the 13-year period between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2023, Google Trends search data demonstrated that RTSA searches are growing as a share of TSA searches, indicating an upward trajectory for RTSA over the entirety of the study period. PubMed literature revealed RTSA represents a rising proportion of all TSA publications, increasing significantly from 31% to 58% of the total publications (P < .001). Publications for both RTSA and TSA have increased 668% and 233%, respectively, over the study period.

Conclusion

RTSA encompasses an increasing portion of patient interest in TSA and, similarly, a growing share of publications on TSA. The significant upward trajectory of these trend lines over the entirety of the study period suggests both public and research interest in RTSA will continue to grow. Trends demonstrating rising public awareness and interest can inform surgeons planning for a future of increased demand for RTSA.
{"title":"Interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is increasing! An analysis of publication frequency and Google Trends","authors":"Catherine M. Call BA ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Kahan MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedure volume is increasing, as is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) procedure volume, which continues to make up a larger proportion of all TSA procedures performed. Whether growing procedure volume is associated with growing patient interest has not yet been assessed with the field of shoulder arthroplasty. The present study aimed to evaluate trends in public and scientific interest in RTSA compared to TSA by assessing Google Trends and publication frequency data, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Google Trends data and publication frequency data on PubMed were collected for RTSA and TSA between January 2010 and December 2023. Trend analyses were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over the 13-year period between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2023, Google Trends search data demonstrated that RTSA searches are growing as a share of TSA searches, indicating an upward trajectory for RTSA over the entirety of the study period. PubMed literature revealed RTSA represents a rising proportion of all TSA publications, increasing significantly from 31% to 58% of the total publications (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Publications for both RTSA and TSA have increased 668% and 233%, respectively, over the study period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>RTSA encompasses an increasing portion of patient interest in TSA and, similarly, a growing share of publications on TSA. The significant upward trajectory of these trend lines over the entirety of the study period suggests both public and research interest in RTSA will continue to grow. Trends demonstrating rising public awareness and interest can inform surgeons planning for a future of increased demand for RTSA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"35 1","pages":"Pages 100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143284737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modeling highly crosslinked polyethylene vs. non–highly crosslinked polyethylene glenoid revision rates for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in osteoarthritis including differing polyethylene glenoid fixation designs 建立骨关节炎解剖肩关节置换术(包括不同的聚乙烯盂固定设计)的 XLPE 与非 XLPE 盂翻修率模型。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.003
David R.J. Gill MB ChB, FRACS, FAOrthA , Sophia Corfield PhD (Hons) , Dylan Harries BSc (Hons), PhD , Richard S. Page BMedSci, MBBS, FRACS, FAOrthA

Background

We compared anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) for osteoarthritis to both highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) and non–highly crosslinked polyethylene (non-XLPE) to determine the rate of revision for multiple patient and implant characteristics, modeling the effect of variation in glenoid fixation design (glenoid component type).

Methods

Data from a large national arthroplasty registry were analyzed for the period April 16, 2004, to December 31, 2022. The study population included all primary aTSA (stemmed and stemless shoulder arthroplasty) procedures with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis and performed using prostheses in current use. These procedures were grouped into 2 cohorts: all polyethylene-bearing glenoid components with either XLPE or non-XLPE. The cumulative percent revision was determined using Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, humeral head size, humeral fixation, type of primary (total stemmed or stemless anatomic), glenoid component type (modular and nonmodular metal-backed glenoid, cemented polyethylene glenoid, and polyethylene glenoid with modified central peg), and surgeon volume (after 2008). Possible interactions were examined. A subanalysis from January 1, 2017, captured the additional patient demographics of American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and glenoid morphology.

Results

Of 11,003 aTSA procedures, the cumulative percent revision at 14 years for all XLPE glenoids (n = 3865) was 5.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9, 8.7), and 18.7% (95% CI 16.6, 21.0) for non-XLPE (n = 7138). XLPE had a lower rate of revision from 2 years (non-XLPE vs. XLPE 2 years + hazard ratio = 1.66, (95% CI 1.09, 2.53), P = .018) adjusting for age, sex, humeral head size, type of primary, humeral stem fixation, and glenoid component type. Overall, glenoid component type and polyethylene type were strongly associated (P < .001 and P = .021, respectively) with all-cause aTSA revision rates. The difference between non-XLPE and XLPE is observed across all polyethylene glenoid types. When considering procedures performed between 2017 and 2022, XLPE vs. non-XLPE rates of revision were not significantly different with extended adjustment at subanalysis, but loosening did not predominate for non-XLPE until year 6 of follow-up.

Conclusion

Both the glenoid design and the type of polyethylene predict the revision rate for aTSA. However, the relative rates of revision between glenoid designs did not differ with polyethylene type. While the polyethylene type was not associated with aTSA revision rates in a more contemporary analysis, the incidence of loosening in non-XLPE prostheses combinations was higher from 6 years may explain this.
背景:我们比较了高度交联聚乙烯(XLPE)和非高度交联聚乙烯(非XLPE)治疗骨关节炎的解剖性全肩关节置换术(aTSA),以确定多例患者的翻修率和假体特征,模拟了关节盂固定设计(关节盂组件类型)变化的影响。方法分析2004年4月16日至2022年12月31日期间来自大型国家关节置换术登记处的数据。研究人群包括所有原发性aTSA(有柄和无柄肩关节置换术)手术,主要诊断为骨关节炎,并使用目前使用的假体。这些手术分为2组:所有聚乙烯关节盂组件,包括XLPE或非XLPE。累积百分比修正采用Kaplan-Meier估计生存率和Cox比例风险模型的风险比来确定,这些模型校正了年龄、性别、肱骨头大小、肱骨固定、原发类型(全柄或无柄解剖)、肩关节组件类型(模块化和非模块化金属支撑肩关节、胶结聚乙烯肩关节和带改良中心钉的聚乙烯肩关节)和外科医生数量(2008年后)。研究了可能的相互作用。从2017年1月1日开始的亚分析,捕获了美国麻醉医师协会评分、体重指数和肩关节形态的额外患者人口统计数据。结果在11003例aTSA手术中,所有XLPE肩关节盂(n = 3865) 14年的累计修正率为5.8%(95%可信区间[CI] 3.9, 8.7),非XLPE肩关节盂(n = 7138)的累计修正率为18.7% (95% CI 16.6, 21.0)。经年龄、性别、肱骨头大小、原发性骨折类型、肱骨干固定和肩关节假体类型调整后,XLPE术后2年的翻修率较低(非XLPE vs. XLPE 2年+风险比= 1.66,(95% CI 1.09, 2.53), P = 0.018)。总体而言,关节盂成分类型和聚乙烯类型密切相关(P <;.001和P = .021),全因aTSA修订率。非XLPE和XLPE之间的差异在所有聚乙烯关节盂类型中都可以观察到。当考虑2017年至2022年间进行的手术时,在亚分析中,XLPE与非XLPE的矫正率在延长调整时没有显着差异,但直到第6年随访时,非XLPE的松动率才占主导地位。结论关节盂的设计和聚乙烯的类型可以预测aTSA的翻修率。然而,聚乙烯型关节盂的相对翻修率并无差异。虽然在更现代的分析中,聚乙烯类型与aTSA翻修率无关,但非xlpe假体组合的松动发生率高于6年,这可能解释了这一点。
{"title":"Modeling highly crosslinked polyethylene vs. non–highly crosslinked polyethylene glenoid revision rates for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in osteoarthritis including differing polyethylene glenoid fixation designs","authors":"David R.J. Gill MB ChB, FRACS, FAOrthA ,&nbsp;Sophia Corfield PhD (Hons) ,&nbsp;Dylan Harries BSc (Hons), PhD ,&nbsp;Richard S. Page BMedSci, MBBS, FRACS, FAOrthA","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We compared anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) for osteoarthritis to both highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) and non–highly crosslinked polyethylene (non-XLPE) to determine the rate of revision for multiple patient and implant characteristics, modeling the effect of variation in glenoid fixation design (glenoid component type).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from a large national arthroplasty registry were analyzed for the period April 16, 2004, to December 31, 2022. The study population included all primary aTSA (stemmed and stemless shoulder arthroplasty) procedures with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis and performed using prostheses in current use. These procedures were grouped into 2 cohorts: all polyethylene-bearing glenoid components with either XLPE or non-XLPE. The cumulative percent revision was determined using Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, humeral head size, humeral fixation, type of primary (total stemmed or stemless anatomic), glenoid component type (modular and nonmodular metal-backed glenoid, cemented polyethylene glenoid, and polyethylene glenoid with modified central peg), and surgeon volume (after 2008). Possible interactions were examined. A subanalysis from January 1, 2017, captured the additional patient demographics of American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and glenoid morphology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 11,003 aTSA procedures, the cumulative percent revision at 14 years for all XLPE glenoids (n = 3865) was 5.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9, 8.7), and 18.7% (95% CI 16.6, 21.0) for non-XLPE (n = 7138). XLPE had a lower rate of revision from 2 years (non-XLPE vs. XLPE 2 years + hazard ratio = 1.66, (95% CI 1.09, 2.53), <em>P</em> = .018) adjusting for age, sex, humeral head size, type of primary, humeral stem fixation, and glenoid component type. Overall, glenoid component type and polyethylene type were strongly associated (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 and <em>P</em> = .021, respectively) with all-cause aTSA revision rates. The difference between non-XLPE and XLPE is observed across all polyethylene glenoid types. When considering procedures performed between 2017 and 2022, XLPE vs. non-XLPE rates of revision were not significantly different with extended adjustment at subanalysis, but loosening did not predominate for non-XLPE until year 6 of follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both the glenoid design and the type of polyethylene predict the revision rate for aTSA. However, the relative rates of revision between glenoid designs did not differ with polyethylene type. While the polyethylene type was not associated with aTSA revision rates in a more contemporary analysis, the incidence of loosening in non-XLPE prostheses combinations was higher from 6 years may explain this.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 843-853"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141700738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of primary language on access to specialized orthopedic care 主要语言对获得骨科专业护理的影响
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.001
Jessica V. Baran BS , Jared Kushner BS , Anna Redden BS , Katelyn Kane BS , Carlos Fernandez MD , Shay V. Daji MD , Garrett R. Jackson MD , Vani J. Sabesan MD

Background

Language barriers can negatively impact the quality of care for non-English speaking patients. Lack of access to health-care providers who speak multiple languages or interpreters in medical offices can result in delayed appointment times, delayed treatment, and increased complications. Access to shoulder surgeons with subspecialty training is limited and this has been established which may further exacerbate the problem with access for these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of primary language spoken on access to specialty shoulder care in South Florida.

Methods

Three populous, diverse counties in South Florida were selected for data collection. Sixty-nine orthopedic offices were identified by Google search and selected via random number generator. Investigators used the Secret Shopper methodology to contact each office to schedule an appointment for a shoulder arthroplasty for a family member who spoke exclusively English or Spanish using a blocked phone number. The ability to schedule a new patient appointment with a fellowship-trained shoulder specialist, the waiting period for the scheduled appointment, and interpretation services for Spanish-speaking patients were collected.

Results

Of the 69 offices called, 35 met inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in wait times for shoulder arthroplasty based on primary language spoken. There was no difference in wait time to see a shoulder specialist between Spanish (13.7 days) and English-speaking patients (12.9 days) (P = .835)). Wait times with a nonfellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon between Spanish and English-speaking patients was also not different (9.5 days and 11.96 days, respectively (P = .522). Similarly, no difference existed in phone call duration (P = .56), median income and wait times for a general orthopedic surgeon, with r = −0.26 (P = .105), or a shoulder specialist, with r = −0.19 (P = .22). Of the clinics accepting patients, 74.3% (n = 26/35) offered Spanish interpretation with 42.3% (n = 11/26) providing a multilingual physician, 26.9% (n = 7/26) a translating service, 23.1% (n = 6/26) had a staff member capable of translation, and 7.7% (n = 2/26) had an available professional interpreter.

Conclusion

While access to orthopedic specialty care may be similar for Spanish-speaking and English-speaking patients in South Florida, over 25% of clinics lack multilingual physicians or qualified interpreter access. This can negatively impact surgical decision-making, postoperative care and outcomes after shoulder surgery. It is essential the orthopedic community advocates for the proper resources to optimally assist surgeons and provide quality care for Spanish-speaking orthopedic patients.
语言障碍会对非英语患者的护理质量产生负面影响。在医疗办公室得不到讲多种语言的保健提供者或口译员,可能导致预约时间推迟、治疗延误和并发症增加。接受过亚专科培训的肩关节外科医生的治疗是有限的,这可能会进一步加剧这些患者的治疗问题。本研究的目的是确定主要语言对南佛罗里达州专业肩部护理的影响。方法选择南佛罗里达州三个人口稠密、多样化的县进行数据收集。通过谷歌搜索识别出69家骨科,并通过随机数发生器进行选择。调查人员使用“秘密购物者”的方法,通过屏蔽的电话号码与每家诊所联系,为只会说英语或西班牙语的家庭成员预约肩关节置换术。收集了与研究员培训的肩部专家安排新患者预约的能力,预约预约的等待时间以及为讲西班牙语的患者提供的口译服务。结果69个办公室中,35个符合纳入标准。基于主要语言的肩关节置换术的等待时间没有显著差异。西班牙语患者(13.7天)和英语患者(12.9天)等待看肩部专科医生的时间没有差异(P = .835)。西班牙语和英语患者接受非奖学金培训的骨科医生的等待时间也没有差异(分别为9.5天和11.96天(P = .522)。同样,普通骨科医生的通话时长(P = 0.56)、收入中位数和等待时间(r = - 0.26 (P = 0.105)、肩部专科医生的通话时长(r = - 0.19 (P = 0.22))也没有差异。在接受患者的诊所中,74.3% (n = 26/35)提供西班牙语口译,42.3% (n = 11/26)提供多语种医生,26.9% (n = 7/26)提供翻译服务,23.1% (n = 6/26)有一名会翻译的工作人员,7.7% (n = 2/26)有一名可用的专业口译员。结论:在南佛罗里达州,虽然说西班牙语和说英语的患者获得骨科专科护理的机会可能相似,但超过25%的诊所缺乏多语种医生或合格的翻译。这可能会对手术决策、术后护理和肩部手术后的结果产生负面影响。骨科社区倡导适当的资源以最佳地协助外科医生并为讲西班牙语的骨科患者提供高质量的护理是至关重要的。
{"title":"The effect of primary language on access to specialized orthopedic care","authors":"Jessica V. Baran BS ,&nbsp;Jared Kushner BS ,&nbsp;Anna Redden BS ,&nbsp;Katelyn Kane BS ,&nbsp;Carlos Fernandez MD ,&nbsp;Shay V. Daji MD ,&nbsp;Garrett R. Jackson MD ,&nbsp;Vani J. Sabesan MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Language barriers can negatively impact the quality of care for non-English speaking patients. Lack of access to health-care providers who speak multiple languages or interpreters in medical offices can result in delayed appointment times, delayed treatment, and increased complications. Access to shoulder surgeons with subspecialty training is limited and this has been established which may further exacerbate the problem with access for these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of primary language spoken on access to specialty shoulder care in South Florida.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three populous, diverse counties in South Florida were selected for data collection. Sixty-nine orthopedic offices were identified by Google search and selected via random number generator. Investigators used the Secret Shopper methodology to contact each office to schedule an appointment for a shoulder arthroplasty for a family member who spoke exclusively English or Spanish using a blocked phone number. The ability to schedule a new patient appointment with a fellowship-trained shoulder specialist, the waiting period for the scheduled appointment, and interpretation services for Spanish-speaking patients were collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 69 offices called, 35 met inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in wait times for shoulder arthroplasty based on primary language spoken. There was no difference in wait time to see a shoulder specialist between Spanish (13.7 days) and English-speaking patients (12.9 days) (<em>P</em> = .835)). Wait times with a nonfellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon between Spanish and English-speaking patients was also not different (9.5 days and 11.96 days, respectively (<em>P</em> = .522). Similarly, no difference existed in phone call duration (<em>P</em> = .56), median income and wait times for a general orthopedic surgeon, with r = −0.26 (<em>P</em> = .105), or a shoulder specialist, with r = −0.19 (<em>P</em> = .22). Of the clinics accepting patients, 74.3% (n = 26/35) offered Spanish interpretation with 42.3% (n = 11/26) providing a multilingual physician, 26.9% (n = 7/26) a translating service, 23.1% (n = 6/26) had a staff member capable of translation, and 7.7% (n = 2/26) had an available professional interpreter.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While access to orthopedic specialty care may be similar for Spanish-speaking and English-speaking patients in South Florida, over 25% of clinics lack multilingual physicians or qualified interpreter access. This can negatively impact surgical decision-making, postoperative care and outcomes after shoulder surgery. It is essential the orthopedic community advocates for the proper resources to optimally assist surgeons and provide quality care for Spanish-speaking orthopedic patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 832-837"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141716445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examination of the factors associated with humeral head size as calculated by 3-dimensional computed tomography in patients with rotator cuff tears 肩袖撕裂患者的三维计算机断层扫描计算肱骨头大小相关因素的检查
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.004
Kohei Uekama MD, Takasuke Miyazaki PT, PhD, Shingo Maesako MD, Shogo Tsutsumi PT, PhD, Noboru Taniguchi MD, PhD

Background

Despite the effectiveness of 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) for identifying bone and joint conditions, there are few clinical data on humeral head enlargement in patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs), including cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). This study aimed to investigate the factors correlated with humeral head size measured through 3D-CT in patients with RCTs.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 43 preoperative patients who were diagnosed via RCTs. The severity of RCTs was classified into 3 types: small-medium tears, large-massive tears, and CTA. The 3D-radius was calculated from the raw radius data using 3D-CT and adjusted by height as a corrected-radius. The reliability of the 3D-radius measurements was calculated as the intraclass correlation coefficient. Various statistical analyses, including correlation coefficients, group comparisons, and multiple regression analyses, were used to explore factors associated with humeral head size.

Results

The interobserver reliability of the 3D-radius was 0.903. The corrected-radius on the affected side exhibited correlations with age (r = 0.598, P < .001) and the acromion-humeral interval (r = −0.609, P < .001). Group comparison between tear sizes, the CTA group had larger corrected-radius than the other groups (P = .001), with no significant difference between the small-medium tear and large-massive tear groups (P = .932). Multiple regression analysis adjusted for covariates revealed that the corrected-radius was correlated with age and the acromion-humeral interval (P < .05, R2 = 0.474).

Conclusion

These findings provide valuable clinical insights into the factors associated with humeral head enlargement, particularly in patients with RCTs. The measurement method we used holds promise for informing the selection of artificial head sizes during the preoperative planning of total shoulder arthroplasty.
尽管三维计算机断层扫描(3D-CT)在识别骨骼和关节状况方面很有效,但关于肩袖撕裂(rct)患者肱骨头肿大的临床数据很少,包括肩袖撕裂关节病(CTA)。本研究旨在探讨在随机对照试验患者中通过3D-CT测量肱骨头大小的相关因素。方法本横断面研究纳入43例术前通过随机对照试验诊断的患者。rct的严重程度分为3种类型:中小型撕裂、大型撕裂和CTA。3d半径是利用3D-CT从原始半径数据中计算出来的,并根据高度进行调整作为校正半径。三维半径测量的可靠性计算为类内相关系数。各种统计分析,包括相关系数、组比较和多元回归分析,用于探讨肱骨头大小的相关因素。结果三维半径的观察者间信度为0.903。患侧矫正半径与年龄相关(r = 0.598, P <;.001)和肩峰-肱骨间隔(r = - 0.609, P <;措施)。组间撕裂大小比较,CTA组矫正半径大于其他组(P = 0.001),中小型撕裂组与大型撕裂组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.932)。经协变量校正后的多元回归分析显示,校正后的桡骨与年龄和肩峰-肱骨间隔相关(P <;0.05, r2 = 0.474)。结论:这些发现为肱骨头增大的相关因素提供了有价值的临床见解,特别是在随机对照试验患者中。我们使用的测量方法有望为全肩关节置换术术前计划中人工头尺寸的选择提供信息。
{"title":"Examination of the factors associated with humeral head size as calculated by 3-dimensional computed tomography in patients with rotator cuff tears","authors":"Kohei Uekama MD,&nbsp;Takasuke Miyazaki PT, PhD,&nbsp;Shingo Maesako MD,&nbsp;Shogo Tsutsumi PT, PhD,&nbsp;Noboru Taniguchi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the effectiveness of 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) for identifying bone and joint conditions, there are few clinical data on humeral head enlargement in patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs), including cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). This study aimed to investigate the factors correlated with humeral head size measured through 3D-CT in patients with RCTs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study included 43 preoperative patients who were diagnosed via RCTs. The severity of RCTs was classified into 3 types: small-medium tears, large-massive tears, and CTA. The 3D-radius was calculated from the raw radius data using 3D-CT and adjusted by height as a corrected-radius. The reliability of the 3D-radius measurements was calculated as the intraclass correlation coefficient. Various statistical analyses, including correlation coefficients, group comparisons, and multiple regression analyses, were used to explore factors associated with humeral head size.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The interobserver reliability of the 3D-radius was 0.903. The corrected-radius on the affected side exhibited correlations with age (r = 0.598, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and the acromion-humeral interval (r = −0.609, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Group comparison between tear sizes, the CTA group had larger corrected-radius than the other groups (<em>P</em> = .001), with no significant difference between the small-medium tear and large-massive tear groups (<em>P</em> = .932). Multiple regression analysis adjusted for covariates revealed that the corrected-radius was correlated with age and the acromion-humeral interval (<em>P</em> &lt; .05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.474).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings provide valuable clinical insights into the factors associated with humeral head enlargement, particularly in patients with RCTs. The measurement method we used holds promise for informing the selection of artificial head sizes during the preoperative planning of total shoulder arthroplasty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 900-906"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142747734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of mental health on major complications following total shoulder arthroplasty 心理健康对全肩关节置换术后主要并发症的影响
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.007
Kenny Ling MD , Emily N. Moya BA , Jack Tesoriero MD , Robert Martino BS , David E. Komatsu PhD , Edward D. Wang MD

Background

The volume of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedures has seen a remarkable surge over the past decade in the United States. Recent research has shown an association between depression and poorer postoperative outcomes following shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasties. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between patients with a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety and the risk of major postoperative complications after TSA.

Methods

The TriNetX Research Network database was queried on May 30, 2023. Patient cohorts and outcomes were defined using International Classification for Disease, 10th Edition diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes. After propensity score matching, the two cohorts were analyzed for differences in major outcomes within two years following the initial procedure.

Results

Of the 45,838 patients who underwent TSA identified in TriNetX, 15,074 patients were included in the depression/anxiety cohort and 30,764 were included in the no depression/anxiety cohort. Propensity score matching was performed to match 13,392 patients from each cohort. Compared to patients with no depression nor anxiety, patients with either depression and/or anxiety were identified to have a higher risk for dislocation (odds ratio [OR] 1.502, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.285-1.756; P < .001), periprosthetic joint infection (OR 1.309, 95% CI 1.123-1.525; P = .001), periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.661, 95% CI 1.341-2.056; P < .001), and revision TSA (OR 1.316, 95% CI 1.150-1.506; P < .001) within 2 years after the initial procedure.

Conclusion

Overall, this study showed that patients who have depression and/or anxiety have a higher risk for dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection, revision TSA, and periprosthetic fracture within two years after TSA.
背景:在美国,全肩关节置换术(TSA)手术的数量在过去十年中出现了显著的激增。最近的研究表明,肩、髋关节和膝关节置换术后抑郁与较差的术后预后之间存在关联。本研究的目的是检查诊断为抑郁和/或焦虑的患者与TSA术后主要并发症风险之间的关系。方法于2023年5月30日查询TriNetX Research Network数据库。使用国际疾病分类第10版诊断代码和现行程序术语代码定义患者队列和结果。在倾向评分匹配后,分析两个队列在初始手术后两年内主要结果的差异。结果在TriNetX中鉴定的45,838例接受TSA的患者中,15,074例患者被纳入抑郁/焦虑组,30,764例患者被纳入无抑郁/焦虑组。对来自每个队列的13392名患者进行倾向评分匹配。与没有抑郁和焦虑的患者相比,抑郁和/或焦虑的患者脱位的风险更高(优势比[or] 1.502, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.285-1.756;P & lt;.001),假体周围关节感染(OR 1.309, 95% CI 1.123-1.525;P = .001),假体周围骨折(OR 1.661, 95% CI 1.341-2.056;P & lt;.001),修订后的TSA (OR 1.316, 95% CI 1.150-1.506;P & lt;.001)初次手术后2年内。总的来说,本研究表明,患有抑郁和/或焦虑的患者在TSA后两年内发生脱位、假体周围关节感染、翻修TSA和假体周围骨折的风险更高。
{"title":"The impact of mental health on major complications following total shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Kenny Ling MD ,&nbsp;Emily N. Moya BA ,&nbsp;Jack Tesoriero MD ,&nbsp;Robert Martino BS ,&nbsp;David E. Komatsu PhD ,&nbsp;Edward D. Wang MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The volume of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedures has seen a remarkable surge over the past decade in the United States. Recent research has shown an association between depression and poorer postoperative outcomes following shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasties. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between patients with a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety and the risk of major postoperative complications after TSA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The TriNetX Research Network database was queried on May 30, 2023. Patient cohorts and outcomes were defined using International Classification for Disease, 10<sup>th</sup> Edition diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes. After propensity score matching, the two cohorts were analyzed for differences in major outcomes within two years following the initial procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 45,838 patients who underwent TSA identified in TriNetX, 15,074 patients were included in the depression/anxiety cohort and 30,764 were included in the no depression/anxiety cohort. Propensity score matching was performed to match 13,392 patients from each cohort. Compared to patients with no depression nor anxiety, patients with either depression and/or anxiety were identified to have a higher risk for dislocation (odds ratio [OR] 1.502, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.285-1.756; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), periprosthetic joint infection (OR 1.309, 95% CI 1.123-1.525; <em>P</em> = .001), periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.661, 95% CI 1.341-2.056; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and revision TSA (OR 1.316, 95% CI 1.150-1.506; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) within 2 years after the initial procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Overall, this study showed that patients who have depression and/or anxiety have a higher risk for dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection, revision TSA, and periprosthetic fracture within two years after TSA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 924-927"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142747737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Internal rotation-based activities of daily living show limitations following reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus anatomic shoulder arthroplasty 反向肩关节置换术与解剖肩关节置换术后,基于内旋的日常生活活动受到限制
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.001
Galo C. Bustamante BS, Erryk S. Katayama BS, Mustaqueem Pallumeera BS, Louis S. Barry BS, John S. Barnett BS, Akshar V. Patel BS, Gregory L. Cvetanovich MD, Julie Y. Bishop MD, Ryan C. Rauck MD

Background

One of the more common limitations after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is limited internal rotation (IR). Outcomes after rTSA are commonly reported as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) but are rarely assessed by specific activities of daily living (ADLs). Analyzing ADLs evaluates for specific motions from PROMs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the deficit in IR following rTSA through ADLs.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted using institutional medical records. Patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty between 2009 and 2020 were reviewed for demographic and clinical variables (type of arthroplasty, indication, range of motion and strength). PROMs were taken by phone at 2-year minimum follow-up. Statistics were calculated as two-tailed using Chi-square or simple t-tests as appropriate.

Results

Among 208 patients, 114 aTSA, and 94 rTSA were identified and included in this study. Both groups reported significant increases in range of motion and strength postoperatively. PROMs were mostly similar between aTSA and rTSA (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 83.4 ± 17.1 vs. 82.3 ± 18.4, P = .643; visual analog scale Pain 2.2 ± 2.8 vs. 1.8 ± 2.4, P = .247), while Simple Shoulder Test did show a difference (9.2 ± 2.8 vs. 7.8 ± 3.2, P = .001) with higher scores in the aTSA cohort. The ADLs which showed significant disparity between aTSA and rTSA were toileting (P = .001), donning a coat (P = .017), reaching one’s back (P = .017), as well as throwing overhand (0.013) with rTSA patients reporting more difficulty in all these ADLs.

Conclusion

Both aTSA and rTSA are safe and efficacious options for shoulder replacement, as evidenced by high Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and low visual analog scale pain scores and should be used according to their established indications. Surgeons may counsel rTSA patients about potential increased deficits in ADLs reliant on IR such as managing toileting and dressing compared to aTSA recipients.
背景:逆行全肩关节置换术(rTSA)后最常见的局限性之一是受限的内旋(IR)。rTSA后的结果通常报告为患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),但很少通过特定的日常生活活动(adl)来评估。分析adl评估来自prom的特定运动。本研究的目的是通过ADLs研究rTSA后IR的缺陷。方法采用回顾性病例对照研究。对2009年至2020年间接受全肩关节置换术的患者进行人口统计学和临床变量(关节置换术类型、适应症、活动范围和力量)的回顾。在最少2年的随访中,通过电话采集PROMs。统计量计算为双尾,适当时使用卡方检验或简单t检验。结果在208例患者中,有114例aTSA和94例rTSA被纳入本研究。两组患者术后活动范围和力量均有显著增加。aTSA与rTSA之间的PROMs基本相似(单次评估数值评估83.4±17.1 vs. 82.3±18.4,P = .643;视觉模拟量表疼痛2.2±2.8比1.8±2.4,P = .247),而简单肩部测试在aTSA队列中得分较高,差异为(9.2±2.8比7.8±3.2,P = .001)。aTSA和rTSA的adl有显著差异的是如厕(P = 0.001)、穿外套(P = 0.017)、伸直背部(P = 0.017)和过手投掷(0.013),rTSA患者报告在所有这些adl中都更困难。结论aTSA和rTSA均是肩关节置换术安全有效的选择,单评估数值评估评分较高,视觉模拟评分较低,应根据其既定适应症使用。外科医生可能会告知rTSA患者,与aTSA接受者相比,依赖IR的adl(如管理如厕和穿衣)可能增加的缺陷。
{"title":"Internal rotation-based activities of daily living show limitations following reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus anatomic shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Galo C. Bustamante BS,&nbsp;Erryk S. Katayama BS,&nbsp;Mustaqueem Pallumeera BS,&nbsp;Louis S. Barry BS,&nbsp;John S. Barnett BS,&nbsp;Akshar V. Patel BS,&nbsp;Gregory L. Cvetanovich MD,&nbsp;Julie Y. Bishop MD,&nbsp;Ryan C. Rauck MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>One of the more common limitations after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is limited internal rotation (IR). Outcomes after rTSA are commonly reported as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) but are rarely assessed by specific activities of daily living (ADLs). Analyzing ADLs evaluates for specific motions from PROMs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the deficit in IR following rTSA through ADLs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective case-control study was conducted using institutional medical records. Patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty between 2009 and 2020 were reviewed for demographic and clinical variables (type of arthroplasty, indication, range of motion and strength). PROMs were taken by phone at 2-year minimum follow-up. Statistics were calculated as two-tailed using Chi-square or simple t-tests as appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 208 patients, 114 aTSA, and 94 rTSA were identified and included in this study. Both groups reported significant increases in range of motion and strength postoperatively. PROMs were mostly similar between aTSA and rTSA (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 83.4 ± 17.1 vs. 82.3 ± 18.4, <em>P</em> = .643; visual analog scale Pain 2.2 ± 2.8 vs. 1.8 ± 2.4, <em>P</em> = .247), while Simple Shoulder Test did show a difference (9.2 ± 2.8 vs. 7.8 ± 3.2, <em>P</em> = .001) with higher scores in the aTSA cohort. The ADLs which showed significant disparity between aTSA and rTSA were toileting (<em>P</em> = .001), donning a coat (<em>P</em> = .017), reaching one’s back (<em>P</em> = .017), as well as throwing overhand (0.013) with rTSA patients reporting more difficulty in all these ADLs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both aTSA and rTSA are safe and efficacious options for shoulder replacement, as evidenced by high Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and low visual analog scale pain scores and should be used according to their established indications. Surgeons may counsel rTSA patients about potential increased deficits in ADLs reliant on IR such as managing toileting and dressing compared to aTSA recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 877-883"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141840007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tuberosity healing in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures with a diaphyseal press-fit humeral stem 肱骨近端骨折反向肩关节置换术中的肱骨远端骨折块愈合与肱骨干的骨骺压入配合
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.004
Benjamin W. Szerlip DO , Matthew T. Glazier DO , Walter R. Smith MD , Mitzi S. Laughlin PhD , T. Bradley Edwards MD

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a viable option for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in the elderly, and cemented humeral fixation is the standard of care. This study evaluates the influence of a diaphyseal press-fit stem with a 142° humeral inclination on tuberosity healing (TH) and functional outcome in RSA for PHF.

Methods

Twenty-three patients received an RSA for PHF by a single surgeon at one center over a 2-year period. The humeral stem design was intended for diaphyseal press fit with a 142° humeral inclination. The tuberosities were repaired for each patient with bone graft and a standard suture technique. Patients’ clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected with a minimum 12-month follow-up.

Results

Nineteen of 23 patients (83%), with a mean age of 75 + years, were available for follow-up at an average of 14 months. Radiographic analysis showed 68% of patients had evidence of TH. Grade 1 scapular notching was found in 32% of patients. There was no implant loosening or subsidence noted. Average range of motion was 163° ± 15° degrees of forward flexion, 113° ± 24° of abduction, internal rotation to the waist, and an average external rotation of 7 ± 1.5 as measured by the Constant-Murley score. The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81.8, and the average Constant-Murley score was 67.9. While not significant, those with TH trended toward better clinical outcomes. There was a 0% revision rate.

Conclusion

A press-fit stem designed for diaphyseal fixation provides consistent reliable results in RSA for PHF. A high percentage of TH was appreciated with a 142° humeral inclination, neutral glenosphere construct, and a standardized bone grafting, suture technique. TH is associated with improved patient outcomes.
背景:反向肩关节置换术(RSA)是治疗老年人肱骨近端骨折(phf)的可行选择,骨水泥肱骨固定是标准的治疗方法。本研究评估了肱骨倾角为142°的骨干压合柄对肱骨骨骺结节愈合(TH)和RSA治疗PHF的功能结果的影响。方法在2年内,23例患者在同一中心接受同一位外科医生对PHF的RSA治疗。肱骨柄设计用于骨干压迫配合,肱骨倾角为142°。采用植骨和标准缝合技术对每个患者的结节进行修复。通过至少12个月的随访收集患者的临床和影像学结果。结果23例患者中有19例(83%)获得平均14个月的随访,平均年龄75岁以上。放射学分析显示68%的患者有TH的证据。32%的患者出现1级肩胛骨切迹。未见种植体松动或下沉。根据Constant-Murley评分,患者的平均活动范围为前屈163°±15°,外展113°±24°,内旋至腰部,平均外旋7±1.5度。美国肩肘外科医生的平均评分为81.8分,康斯坦特-莫雷评分为67.9分。虽然不显著,但那些有甲状腺激素的患者趋向于更好的临床结果。修正率为0%。结论设计用于骨干骺端固定的压合柄可提供一致可靠的RSA治疗PHF的结果。采用142°肱骨倾斜、中性盂内球构造和标准化植骨、缝合技术,观察高比例的TH。TH与患者预后改善有关。
{"title":"Tuberosity healing in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures with a diaphyseal press-fit humeral stem","authors":"Benjamin W. Szerlip DO ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Glazier DO ,&nbsp;Walter R. Smith MD ,&nbsp;Mitzi S. Laughlin PhD ,&nbsp;T. Bradley Edwards MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.06.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a viable option for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in the elderly, and cemented humeral fixation is the standard of care. This study evaluates the influence of a diaphyseal press-fit stem with a 142° humeral inclination on tuberosity healing (TH) and functional outcome in RSA for PHF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-three patients received an RSA for PHF by a single surgeon at one center over a 2-year period. The humeral stem design was intended for diaphyseal press fit with a 142° humeral inclination. The tuberosities were repaired for each patient with bone graft and a standard suture technique. Patients’ clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected with a minimum 12-month follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen of 23 patients (83%), with a mean age of 75 + years, were available for follow-up at an average of 14 months. Radiographic analysis showed 68% of patients had evidence of TH. Grade 1 scapular notching was found in 32% of patients. There was no implant loosening or subsidence noted. Average range of motion was 163° ± 15° degrees of forward flexion, 113° ± 24° of abduction, internal rotation to the waist, and an average external rotation of 7 ± 1.5 as measured by the Constant-Murley score. The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81.8, and the average Constant-Murley score was 67.9. While not significant, those with TH trended toward better clinical outcomes. There was a 0% revision rate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A press-fit stem designed for diaphyseal fixation provides consistent reliable results in RSA for PHF. A high percentage of TH was appreciated with a 142° humeral inclination, neutral glenosphere construct, and a standardized bone grafting, suture technique. TH is associated with improved patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 854-861"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141704491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with modular long stem for revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty 模块化长柄复位全肩关节置换术的短期临床和影像学结果
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.006
Eddie Y. Lo MD , Austin Witt MD , Alvin Ouseph MS , Monia Nazemi MS , Nancy Weingast BSN , Sumant G. Krishnan MD

Background

When performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with compromised proximal bone fixation, surgeons must consider using specialized stems with a distal press-fit design. In this study, the authors report on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent surgical management with modular diaphyseal press-fit stems.

Methods

In 2017-2021, patients who underwent revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty reconstruction with diaphyseal press-fit stems (Aequalis Adjustable Stem [AS] or Aequalis Flex Revive Stem [RS]; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) with minimum 1-year follow-up were identified. Patients with complex proximal humerus and scapula fractures, neurological injuries, and custom humeral replacements were excluded. Demographics and clinical follow-up data including range of motion, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed for aseptic humeral loosening, periprosthetic instability, stress shielding, periprosthetic fractures, and humeral stem failure.

Results

Sixty-five patients (29 AS and 36 RS) had mean follow-up of 25 months (standard deviation ± 16). Mean anterior elevation improved from 57° ± 39 preoperative to 121° ± 31 postoperatively. Mean external rotation improved from 3° ± 17 to 34° ± 16. Mean internal rotation improved from 4° ± 13 to 35° ± 26. Mean VAS improved from 6.7 ± 2.2 to 2.9 ± 1.5. Mean SST improved from 13% ± 13% to 65% ± 22%. Mean ASES score improved from 19 ± 13 to 60 ± 18. Mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation improved from 25% ± 18% to 71% ± 17%. There were statistically significant differences in mean postoperative VAS (P = .0017), SST (P = .025), and ASES score (P = .0228) in favor of the RS group. There were no other notable differences between groups. The most common complications were aseptic humeral stem loosening (24% vs. 3%, P = .018) and periprosthetic instability (10% vs. 6%, P = .649) for the AS and RS cohorts, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between surgical revision rates between the AS and RS cohorts (24% vs. 8%, respectively. P = .096).

Discussion

Diaphyseal press-fit modular humeral stem can provide a viable surgical alternative in compromised proximal humeral bone. At short-term follow-up, the clinical and radiographic outcomes are comparable to other stem designs. Further studies are necessary to identify risks and causes of failure associated with modular diaphyseal press-fit stems.
背景:当进行近端骨固定受损的反向全肩关节置换术时,外科医生必须考虑使用带有远端加压配合设计的专用柄。在这项研究中,作者报告了采用模块化骨干压合柄进行手术治疗的患者的临床和影像学结果。方法2017-2021年,采用骨干压合柄(Aequalis Adjustable Stem [AS]或Aequalis Flex Revive Stem [RS])进行翻修逆行全肩关节置换术重建的患者;Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA)进行了至少1年的随访。排除肱骨近端和肩胛骨复杂骨折、神经损伤和定制肱骨置换术的患者。回顾性回顾了人口统计学和临床随访数据,包括运动范围、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、简单肩部测试(SST)、美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分和单一评估数值评估。术后x线片回顾无菌性肱骨松动、假体周围不稳定、应力屏蔽、假体周围骨折和肱骨干失效。结果65例患者(AS 29例,RS 36例)平均随访25个月(标准差±16)。平均前路抬高由术前的57°±39°提高到术后的121°±31°。平均外旋从3°±17°改善到34°±16°。平均内旋从4°±13°改善到35°±26°。平均VAS由6.7±2.2改善至2.9±1.5。平均海温由13%±13%提高到65%±22%。平均as评分由19±13分提高至60±18分。平均单次评估数字评估从25%±18%提高到71%±17%。RS组术后平均VAS (P = 0.0017)、SST (P = 0.025)、as评分(P = 0.0228)差异均有统计学意义。两组之间没有其他显著差异。AS组和RS组最常见的并发症分别是无菌性肱骨杆松动(24%对3%,P = 0.018)和假体周围不稳定(10%对6%,P = 0.649)。AS组和RS组的手术翻修率差异无统计学意义(分别为24%和8%)。p = .096)。骨干加压式模块化肱骨干可以为肱骨近端受损提供可行的手术选择。在短期随访中,临床和影像学结果与其他系统设计相当。进一步的研究是必要的,以确定风险和失败的原因与模块化的骨干压合干。
{"title":"Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with modular long stem for revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Eddie Y. Lo MD ,&nbsp;Austin Witt MD ,&nbsp;Alvin Ouseph MS ,&nbsp;Monia Nazemi MS ,&nbsp;Nancy Weingast BSN ,&nbsp;Sumant G. Krishnan MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>When performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with compromised proximal bone fixation, surgeons must consider using specialized stems with a distal press-fit design. In this study, the authors report on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent surgical management with modular diaphyseal press-fit stems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 2017-2021, patients who underwent revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty reconstruction with diaphyseal press-fit stems (Aequalis Adjustable Stem [AS] or Aequalis Flex Revive Stem [RS]; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) with minimum 1-year follow-up were identified. Patients with complex proximal humerus and scapula fractures, neurological injuries, and custom humeral replacements were excluded. Demographics and clinical follow-up data including range of motion, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed for aseptic humeral loosening, periprosthetic instability, stress shielding, periprosthetic fractures, and humeral stem failure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-five patients (29 AS and 36 RS) had mean follow-up of 25 months (standard deviation ± 16). Mean anterior elevation improved from 57° ± 39 preoperative to 121° ± 31 postoperatively. Mean external rotation improved from 3° ± 17 to 34° ± 16. Mean internal rotation improved from 4° ± 13 to 35° ± 26. Mean VAS improved from 6.7 ± 2.2 to 2.9 ± 1.5. Mean SST improved from 13% ± 13% to 65% ± 22%. Mean ASES score improved from 19 ± 13 to 60 ± 18. Mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation improved from 25% ± 18% to 71% ± 17%. There were statistically significant differences in mean postoperative VAS (<em>P</em> = .0017), SST (<em>P</em> = .025), and ASES score (<em>P</em> = .0228) in favor of the RS group. There were no other notable differences between groups. The most common complications were aseptic humeral stem loosening (24% vs. 3%, <em>P</em> = .018) and periprosthetic instability (10% vs. 6%, <em>P</em> = .649) for the AS and RS cohorts, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between surgical revision rates between the AS and RS cohorts (24% vs. 8%, respectively. <em>P</em> = .096).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Diaphyseal press-fit modular humeral stem can provide a viable surgical alternative in compromised proximal humeral bone. At short-term follow-up, the clinical and radiographic outcomes are comparable to other stem designs. Further studies are necessary to identify risks and causes of failure associated with modular diaphyseal press-fit stems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 915-923"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142747736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mid- to long-term outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review 逆向全肩关节置换术的中长期疗效:一项系统综述
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.011
Kira L. Smith BS , Luc M. Fortier MD , Margaret A. Sinkler MD , Monish S. Lavu MHM , Jacob G. Calcei MD , Robert J. Gillespie MD , Raymond E. Chen MD

Background

The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasingly gaining popularity in treating various traumatic and degenerative glenohumeral diseases as well as rotator cuff-deficient shoulders. An investigation of midterm outcomes of rTSA is warranted as this is a relatively new procedure when compared to other forms of arthroplasty. This systematic literature review evaluates midterm outcomes of rTSA at a minimum of five-year follow-up.

Methods

A literature search was performed for studies reporting long-term outcomes of rTSA in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Papers were included if they described long-term outcomes of rTSA at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Data were collected on patient demographics, including age, gender, and body mass index. Follow-up duration, indication for surgery, patient-reported outcome measures, and range of motion (ROM) were also recorded. Complication rates and device survivorship were also collected.

Results

There were a total of 4127 patients from 34 included studies. The overall study population was 74% female, and the average age was 72.6 years (23-95). The most common diagnosis was cuff tear arthropathy [35.2%], followed by proximal humerus fracture [19.5%], and rotator cuff tears [14.9%]. Patient-reported outcome measures improved significantly when comparing preoperative and postoperative values. ROM, including forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation, also improved significantly postoperatively. The overall complication rate was 14.7% (n = 981). The most common complications were implant loosening (3.3%, n = 219) and instability or dislocation (3.3%, n = 218). The overall revision rate was 5.5% (n = 310). The device survivorship rate at a minimum of 5 years was 94%.

Conclusion

This systematic review demonstrated that outcomes of rTSA performed for a variety of shoulder pathologies demonstrate significant improvement in nearly all patient-reported outcome scores as well as significant improvement in ROM at long-term follow-up. The overall complication rate of 14.7% is relatively low, and the device survivorship is good at 94% at a minimum of 5 years.
背景:逆行全肩关节置换术(rTSA)在治疗各种外伤性和退行性肩关节疾病以及肩袖缺陷肩部方面越来越受欢迎。与其他形式的关节置换术相比,rTSA是一种相对较新的手术,因此有必要对其中期结果进行调查。本系统的文献综述评估了rTSA至少5年随访的中期结果。方法根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,对报告rTSA长期结果的研究进行文献检索。在至少5年的随访中描述rTSA的长期结果的论文被纳入。收集患者人口统计数据,包括年龄、性别和体重指数。随访时间、手术指征、患者报告的结果测量和活动范围(ROM)也被记录下来。同时收集并发症发生率和器械存活率。结果34项纳入研究共纳入4127例患者。总体研究人群中女性占74%,平均年龄为72.6岁(23-95岁)。最常见的诊断是袖带撕裂性关节病(35.2%),其次是肱骨近端骨折(19.5%)和肩袖撕裂(14.9%)。当比较术前和术后的价值时,患者报告的结果测量显着改善。ROM,包括前仰、外展和外旋,术后也有显著改善。总并发症发生率为14.7% (n = 981)。最常见的并发症是种植体松动(3.3%,n = 219)和不稳定或脱位(3.3%,n = 218)。总体修正率为5.5% (n = 310)。至少5年的器械存活率为94%。本系统综述表明,在长期随访中,rTSA治疗各种肩关节病变的结果显示,几乎所有患者报告的结果评分都有显著改善,ROM也有显著改善。总体并发症发生率为14.7%,相对较低,至少5年的设备存活率为94%。
{"title":"Mid- to long-term outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review","authors":"Kira L. Smith BS ,&nbsp;Luc M. Fortier MD ,&nbsp;Margaret A. Sinkler MD ,&nbsp;Monish S. Lavu MHM ,&nbsp;Jacob G. Calcei MD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Gillespie MD ,&nbsp;Raymond E. Chen MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.011","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasingly gaining popularity in treating various traumatic and degenerative glenohumeral diseases as well as rotator cuff-deficient shoulders. An investigation of midterm outcomes of rTSA is warranted as this is a relatively new procedure when compared to other forms of arthroplasty. This systematic literature review evaluates midterm outcomes of rTSA at a minimum of five-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was performed for studies reporting long-term outcomes of rTSA in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Papers were included if they described long-term outcomes of rTSA at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Data were collected on patient demographics, including age, gender, and body mass index. Follow-up duration, indication for surgery, patient-reported outcome measures, and range of motion (ROM) were also recorded. Complication rates and device survivorship were also collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were a total of 4127 patients from 34 included studies. The overall study population was 74% female, and the average age was 72.6 years (23-95). The most common diagnosis was cuff tear arthropathy [35.2%], followed by proximal humerus fracture [19.5%], and rotator cuff tears [14.9%]. Patient-reported outcome measures improved significantly when comparing preoperative and postoperative values. ROM, including forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation, also improved significantly postoperatively. The overall complication rate was 14.7% (n = 981). The most common complications were implant loosening (3.3%, n = 219) and instability or dislocation (3.3%, n = 218). The overall revision rate was 5.5% (n = 310). The device survivorship rate at a minimum of 5 years was 94%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This systematic review demonstrated that outcomes of rTSA performed for a variety of shoulder pathologies demonstrate significant improvement in nearly all patient-reported outcome scores as well as significant improvement in ROM at long-term follow-up. The overall complication rate of 14.7% is relatively low, and the device survivorship is good at 94% at a minimum of 5 years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 953-963"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142748287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1