Amebicides against Acanthamoeba castellanii: The Impact of Organism Models Used in Amebicide Assays

Leonardo Fernandes Geres, Elena Sartori, João Marcos dos Santos Neves, Danilo Ciccone Miguel, Selma Giorgio
{"title":"Amebicides against Acanthamoeba castellanii: The Impact of Organism Models Used in Amebicide Assays","authors":"Leonardo Fernandes Geres, Elena Sartori, João Marcos dos Santos Neves, Danilo Ciccone Miguel, Selma Giorgio","doi":"10.3390/parasitologia4010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acanthamoeba castellanii is a free-living amoeba capable of causing keratitis in humans, with most cases related to contact lens wearers and surgical procedures. In addition, A. castellanii may cause pneumonia, granulomatous encephalitis, and skin lesions in immunocompromised individuals. Considering the lack of adequate treatment for acanthamoebiasis, the aim of this review is to assess relevant original articles that covered the current arsenal of drugs and models of organisms used in the field of experimental A. castellanii infection that have been published within the last 5 years (2018–2023) in journals indexed by the following databases: Electronic Library Online (SciELO), PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (Lilacs), Google Academic, and Capes Periodical Portal. Thirty articles were selected, and the main findings showed that the available therapeutics for acanthamoebiasis are still limited and nonspecific, and no innovations have occurred in the last few years. In terms of novel chemotherapeutic advances, the last findings have focused on the activity of natural products (plant-based extracts), nanoemulsions, coated particles, and photodynamic association against A. castellanii, without advancing from the bench to bedside perspective. The choice of a non-representative model system for acanthamoebiasis, as well as the limitations of studies in vivo, impairs the advancement of toxicity analyses. Efforts should be made to expand the model systems used, standardize tests for evaluating anti-A. castellanii drug candidates, and increase and support research groups focusing on the biology of A. castellanii and the pharmacology of acanthamoebiasis.","PeriodicalId":513388,"journal":{"name":"Parasitologia","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia4010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acanthamoeba castellanii is a free-living amoeba capable of causing keratitis in humans, with most cases related to contact lens wearers and surgical procedures. In addition, A. castellanii may cause pneumonia, granulomatous encephalitis, and skin lesions in immunocompromised individuals. Considering the lack of adequate treatment for acanthamoebiasis, the aim of this review is to assess relevant original articles that covered the current arsenal of drugs and models of organisms used in the field of experimental A. castellanii infection that have been published within the last 5 years (2018–2023) in journals indexed by the following databases: Electronic Library Online (SciELO), PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (Lilacs), Google Academic, and Capes Periodical Portal. Thirty articles were selected, and the main findings showed that the available therapeutics for acanthamoebiasis are still limited and nonspecific, and no innovations have occurred in the last few years. In terms of novel chemotherapeutic advances, the last findings have focused on the activity of natural products (plant-based extracts), nanoemulsions, coated particles, and photodynamic association against A. castellanii, without advancing from the bench to bedside perspective. The choice of a non-representative model system for acanthamoebiasis, as well as the limitations of studies in vivo, impairs the advancement of toxicity analyses. Efforts should be made to expand the model systems used, standardize tests for evaluating anti-A. castellanii drug candidates, and increase and support research groups focusing on the biology of A. castellanii and the pharmacology of acanthamoebiasis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对卡氏棘阿米巴的杀阿米巴剂:杀阿米巴剂试验中使用的生物模型的影响
卡斯特阿米巴是一种自由生活的阿米巴,能引起人类角膜炎,大多数病例与隐形眼镜佩戴者和手术过程有关。此外,卡氏棘阿米巴还可能引起肺炎、肉芽肿性脑炎以及免疫力低下者的皮肤损伤。考虑到棘阿米巴病缺乏适当的治疗方法,本综述旨在评估过去5年内(2018-2023年)发表在以下数据库收录的期刊中的相关原创文章,这些文章涵盖了目前用于实验性卡斯特拉氏菌感染领域的药物库和生物模型:电子图书馆在线(SciELO)、PubMed、医学文献分析和检索系统在线(Medline)、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献(Lilacs)、Google Academic 和 Capes Periodical Portal。研究选取了 30 篇文章,主要结果显示,目前治疗棘阿米巴病的药物仍然有限,而且没有特异性,在过去几年中也没有创新。在新的化疗进展方面,最近的研究成果主要集中在天然产品(植物提取物)、纳米乳剂、涂层颗粒和光动力联合疗法对卡氏原虫的活性上,没有从工作台到床边的角度取得进展。由于选择了不具代表性的棘阿米巴病模型系统,以及体内研究的局限性,影响了毒性分析的进展。应努力扩大所使用的模型系统,规范评估抗卡氏原虫候选药物的测试,并增加和支持重点研究卡氏原虫生物学和棘阿米巴病药理学的研究小组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Monthly Occurrence of Endoparasites of Chaetognaths in a Coastal System of the Mexican Central Pacific Isolated and Associated Use of the Nematophagous Fungi Pochonia chlamydosporia and Duddingtonia flagrans to Control Taenia saginata Eggs Feeding Mechanisms of Pathogenic Protozoa with a Focus on Endocytosis and the Digestive Vacuole Neosporosis in Naturally Infected Sheep Herds, a Prospective Cohort Study over Three Years Evaluation and Standardization of RNA Extractions with Quality for RNA-Seq for Balamuthia mandrillaris
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1